Hanayama, N., Christakis, G.T., Mallidi, H.R., Joyner, C.D., Fermes, S.E., Morgan, C.D., et al. (2002) Patient prosthesis mismatch is rare after aortic valve replacement: Valve size may be irrelevant. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 73, 1822-1829.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(02)03582-8

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Effect of aortic valve replacement on ventricular recovery and functional class in patients with reduced left ventricular function

  AUTHORS: Mahdi Ait Houssa, Younes Moutakiallah, Abdessamad Abdou, Abdedaïm Hatim, Mohamed Drissi, Brahim Amahzoune, Youssef El Bekkali, Atif Benyass, Abdelatif Boulahya

  KEYWORDS: Aortic Valve Disease; Aortic Valve Replacement; Left Ventricular Dysfunction

  JOURNAL NAME: World Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases, Vol.3 No.9, December 17, 2013

  ABSTRACT: Objective: The aim of the study was to assess the effects of aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) or regurgitation (AR) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Patients and methods: Retrospective analysis identified 75 consecutive patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessed by echocardiography 10.9% in the AS and AR groups after echocardiography control. The survival rates at 1, 5 and 10 years were respectively 94.4%, 87% and 80% in AS group and 95.2%, 93% and 89% in AR group. Conclusion: Despite higher perioperative mortality in patients with aortic valve disease (AS or AR) and LV dysfunction, long-term outcome is excellent. We, therefore, conclude that AVR can be performed and it should not be denied to patients on the basis of low EF alone.