Possibility to Realize the Brain-Computer Interface from the Quantum Brain Model Based on Superluminal Particles

Takaaki Musha, Toshiki Sugiyama

.

DOI: 10.4236/jqis.2011.13015                

Abstract

R. Penrose and S. Hameroff have proposed an idea that the brain can attain high efficient quantum computation by functioning of microtubular structure of neurons in the cytoskelton of biological cells, including neurons of the brain. But Tegmark estimated the duration of coherence of a quantum state in a warm wet brain to be on the order of 10^>–13

Keywords

Brain-Computer Interface, Evanescent Photon, Tachyon, Quantum Computation, Decoherence

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	S. Hameroff and R. Penrose, “Conscious Events as Orchestrared Space-Time Selections,” Journal of Consci- ousness Studies, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1996, pp. 36-53.
[2]	S. Hameroff, “Quantum Computation in Brain Microtubules? The Penrose-Hameroff ‘Orch OR’ Model of Consciousness,” Philosophical Transactions Royal Society London (A), Vol. 356, No. 1743, 1998, pp. 1869- 1896.
[3]	S. Hameroff, “Information Processing in Microtubules,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, Vol. 98, No. 4, 1992, pp. 549-561. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(82)90137-0
[4]	M. Jibu and K. Yasue, “What Is Mind? Quantum Field Theory of Evanescent Photons in Brain as Quantum Theory of Consciousness,” Informatica, Vol. 21, No. 3, 1997, pp. 471-490.
[5]	M. Jibu, K. Yasue and S. Hagan, “Evanescent (Tunneling) Photon and Cellular Vision,” BioSystems, Vol. 42, No. 1, 1997, pp. 65-73. doi:10.1016/S0303-2647(97)01686-9
[6]	M. Tegmark, “Importance of Quantum Coherence in Brain Processes,” Physical Review E, Vol. 61, No. 4, 2000, pp. 4194-4206. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.61.4194
[7]	T. Musha, “Possibility of High Performance Quantum Computation by Superluminal Evanescent Photons in Living Systems,” BioSystems, Vol. 96, No. 3, 2009, pp. 242-245. doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2009.03.002
[8]	M. Jibu, K. H. Pribram and K. Yasue, “From Conscious Experience to Memory Storage and Ritrieval: The Role of Quantum Brain Dynamics and Boson Condensation of Evanescent Photons,” International Journal of Modern Physics B, Vol. 10, No. 13&14, 1996, pp. 1753-1754. doi:10.1142/S0217979296000805
[9]	E. Recami, “Superluminal Motions? A Bird-Eye View of the Experimental Situation,” Foundations of Physics, Vol. 31, No. 7, 2001, pp. 1119-1135. doi:10.1023/A:1017582525039
[10]	R. W. Ziolkowski, “Superluminal Transmission of Infor- mation through an Electromagnetic Metamaterial,” Phy- sical Review E, Vol. 63, No. 4, 2001, pp. 046604- 046617. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.63.046604
[11]	E. Lazlo, “Science and the Akashic Field: An Integral Theory of Everything,” Inner Traditions, Rochester, 2004.
[12]	G. Feinberg, “Possibility of Faster-Than-Light Particles,” Physical Review, Vol. 159, No. 5, 1967, pp.1089-1100.
[13]	B. Duplantier, J.-M. Raimond and V. Rivasseau, “Quantum Decoherence, Poincare Seminar 2005,” Birkh?user Verlag Basel, Berlin, 2006.
[14]	W. H. Zurek, “Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical—Revisited,” Los Alamos Science, No. 27, 2002, pp. 2-25.
[15]	E. E. Valarino, “On the Other Side of Life, Exploring the Phenomenon of the Near-Death Experience,” Perseus Publishing, Cambridge, 1997.