Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Performance—Evidence from Taiwan

Yungchih George Wang

.

DOI: 10.4236/me.2011.25087                

Abstract

Traditionally, a firm aims to achieve the goal of maximizing firm value. The concept of business ethics arises to examine how a firm could meet the goal of maximizing firm value while in the meantime meditating the conflicts among all the stakeholders ethically. Recently, the concept of business ethics evolves into corporate social responsibility (CSR), which now has become a major issue in the business environment. The modern definition of CSR argues that a firm, as a corporate citizen, is expected not only to fulfill its economic responsibility, but also its social and environmental responsibilities. Built on this new definition, this study aims to empirically explore the impact of fulfilling CSR on stock performance. For this research purpose, we construct a local CSR index (CSRI) based on two ideas, socially responsible investment (SRI) and corporate contributions to stakeholders. Sampled the data from Taiwan Stock Exchange and Taiwan Economic Journal for the time period of 2001-2009, three CSR portfolios based on the CSRI (high, medium, and low) are constructed to examine short-run and long-run stock returns relative to those of benchmark portfolios (market index, value stocks, and growth stocks). The main finding reveals that fulfilling CSR has a significantly positive impact on stock performance. The implication suggests that a firm could serve as a good corporate citizen, while in the meantime pursuing the growth of stockholder’s wealth.

Keywords

Business Ethics, Stakeholders, Corporate Social Responsibility, Firm Performance, Socially Responsible Investment

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	K. Ohmae, “Crisis and Business Opportunity of Bour- geoisie Disappearance in M-Shape Society,” Business Weekly, 2007, Taiwan.
[2]	M. E. Porter and M. R. Kramer, “Strategy and Society: The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 84, No. 12, 2006, pp. 78-92.
[3]	G. Laczniak and P. Murphy, “Fostering Ethical Market- ing Decisions,” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1991, pp. 259-271. doi:10.1007/BF00382965
[4]	R. L. Sims and K. G. Kroeck, “The Influence of Ethics Fit on Employee Satisfaction, Commitment and Turn- over,” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1994, pp. 259-271.
[5]	L. E. Preston and D. P. O’Bannon, “The Corporate So- cial-Financial Performance Relationship: A Typology and Analysis,” Business and Society, No. 36, No. 4, 1997, pp. 419-429. doi:10.1177/000765039703600406
[6]	I. Maignan, O. C. Ferrell, and L. Ferrell, “A Stakeholder Model for Implementing Social Responsibility in Mar- keting,” European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 39, No. 9/ 10, 2005, pp. 956-977. doi:10.1108/03090560510610662
[7]	C. F. Chu and P. P. Yang, “Empirical Examination of Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance,” Financial Forum, Vol. 7, 2009, pp. 135-137.
[8]	S. Vyakarnam, A. Bailey, A. Myers and D. Burnett, “To- wards an Understanding of Ethical Behavior in Small Firms,” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 16, No. 15, 1997, pp. 1625-1636. doi:10.1023/A:1022452502299
[9]	L. J. Brooks, “Corporate Ethical Performance: Trends, Forecasts and Outlooks,” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 8, 1989, pp. 39-50.
[10]	S. Rosenthal and R. A. Buchholz, “Bridging Environ- mental and Business Ethics: A Pragmatic Framework,” Environmental Ethics, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1998, pp. 394-408.
[11]	R. N. Lussier, “Management Fundamentals,” Thomson Learning, Inc., New York, 2000.
[12]	O. C. Ferrell and H. Geoffrey, “Business: A Changing World,” McGraw-Hill, New York, 2000.
[13]	K. Davis and R. L. Blomstrom, “Environment and Re- sponsibility,” Business and Society, 3rd Edition, McGraw Hill, New York, 1975.
[14]	A. B. Carroll, “A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance,” Academy of Manage- ment Review, Vol. 4, 1979, pp. 497-505.
[15]	D. J. Wood, “Corporate Social Performance Revisited,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, 1991, pp. 691- 718.
[16]	R. L. Daft, “Organization Theory and Design,” South- Western College Publishing, Cincinnati, 2003.
[17]	D. Vogel, “Is There a Market for Virtue? A Critical Ap- praisal of Corporate Social Responsibility,” The Third Transatlantic Business Ethic Conference, Barcelona, 1-3 October 2004.
[18]	A. B. Carroll, “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Respon- sibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders,” Business Horizons, Vol. 34, No. 4, 1991, pp. 39-48. doi:10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G
[19]	C. C. Verschoor, “A Study of the Link between a Cor- poration’s Financial Performance and Its Commitment of Ethics,” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 17, No. 13, 1998, pp. 1509-1516. doi:10.1023/A:1006020402881
[20]	I. Maignan and O. C. Ferrell, “Corporate Social Respon- sibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework,” Jour- nal of Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2004, pp. 3-19. doi:10.1177/0092070303258971
[21]	J. J. Griffin and J. F. Mahon, “The Corporate Social Per- formance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research,” Business and Society, Vol. 36, No. 1, 1997, pp. 5-31. doi:10.1177/000765039703600102
[22]	S. Mahapatra, ”Investor Reaction to a Corporate Social Accounting,” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1984, pp. 29-40. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5957.1984.tb00054.x
[23]	A. McWilliams and D. Siegel, “Corporate Social Re- sponsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Mi- sspecification?” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 5, 2000, pp. 603-609.
[24]	R. Peters and M. R. Mullen, “Some Evidence of the Cu- mulative Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance,” Journal of Global Business Is- sues, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2009, pp. 1-14.