Incisional Hernias: Risk Factors and Treatment in a Context of Limited Resources ()
1. Introduction
Incisional hernias constitute one of the most common complications of open abdominal surgery. Their impact varies from 3% to 20% depending on studies [1] [2] . They are responsible for significant morbidity [3] . Several risk factors have been identified. The most frequent are wound infections observed after the first surgery, intra-abdominal hyperpression and failing parietal closing techniques [4] . The treatment of incisional hernias is surgical. Two main surgical techniques are used. The open suture repair is the less costly technique, but it seems to be the origin of a high rate of recidivism [4] [5] . The best technique uses synthetic prostheses [6] [7] . These prostheses are relatively high cost and less accessible in rural Africa. In this environment, there is therefore a major interest for prevention. This study is aimed at identifying the risk factors and describing the therapeutic modalities of incisional hernias in a secondary hospital in Burkina Faso, in order to improve strategies of treatment and prevention.
2. Patients and Methods
This study is aimed at identifying the risk factors and describing the therapeutic modalities of incisional hernias in a secondary hospital in Burkina Faso.
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all the patients who underwent surgery for incisional hernia in the general surgery ward of the regional hospital of Tenkodogo (Burkina Faso) between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2012. We listed the records of all patients operated for incisional hernia during the study period. However, recurrent incisional hernias, post traumatic hernias and records containing incomplete data were excluded from the study. Patients were monitored for 3 years after incisional hernia surgery. For each patient, we collected the epidemiological, clinical, therapeutic and evolutionary data. We also collected data to classify the incisional hernias in conformity with the “European Hernia Society”. This classification distinguishes 3 classes depending on the width of the incisional hernia: small size hernia (less than 5 cm), medium size hernia (5 - 10 cm) and large size hernia (more than 10 cm).
3. Results
A total of 54 patients were included in the study. Their average age was 22.3 years (standard deviation: 11.4 years). We counted 19 female patients (35.2%) and 35 male patients (64.8). Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the participants are summarized in Table 1.
The average time from the first surgery to the diagnosis of incisional hernias was 8 months (SD 2.6 months). The incisional hernias were classified according to the criteria of the “European Hernia Society”. This classification is reported in Figure 1.
According to the first surgery, acute generalized peritonitis was involved in 24 cases (44.4%). The distribution of patients according to the indication of the first surgery is reported in Table 2.
Regarding the type of incision of the first surgery, vertical midline incisions were the most providers of incisional hernias with 37 cases (68.5%). The distribution of patients according to the type of initial incision in the first surgery is reported in Table 3.
Table 1. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients.
Table 2. Distribution of patients according to the indication of the first surgery.
Table 3. Distribution of patients according to the type of incision made during the first surgery.
Figure 1. Distribution of the patients according to the size of incisional hernia.
All patients were operated on. The interventions took place under general anaesthetic. Antibiotic prophylaxis based on ceftriaxone was conducted in anesthetic induction. It has been continued for 3 days after surgery. Two surgical techniques have been used: open suture repair and open mesh repair. Open suture repair was proposed to patients who could not pay for a prosthesis. Forty-two patients (77.8%) were treated by open suture repair. It came with a suture overlap uniting the aponeuroses of wide abdominis or rectus abdominis between them. This suture was made with resorbable thread.
Twelve patients (22.2%) benefited from open mesh repair. Polypropylene implants have been used. The technique consisted in a dissection of the muscle and fascial plans. The graft was placed in pre-aponeurotic and retro muscular position. The mean length of hospital stay for all patients was 3.4 days (SD = 1.8). In the immediate postoperative, 2 cases of abdominal wall hematoma were noted. Nine patients (16.7%), all treated by open suture repair, presented recurrence after 12 months. Open mesh repair has been proposed to these patients. No recurrence was observed in patients who received a prosthetic treatment.
4. Discussion
Incisional hernias occurred in relatively young patients in our context, the average age of onset was 22.3 years. In Europe, the average age varies from 50 to 60 years [6] [8] . This difference could be explained by the fact that our study was conducted in a general surgery ward carrying out pediatric surgery at the same time. The average time of onset of incisional hernias was 8 months. Incisional hernias usually appear during the first year following the first surgery [9] . It is therefore a relatively early complication. We noticed a predominance of large size incisional hernias at the expense of incisional hernias of small size. In Western literature, there is a predominance of small-size incisional hernias [9] . This difference could be explained by geographic and financial inaccessibility to hospital structures in our context. This inaccessibility made that small-size incisional hernias, which do not generally cause significant discomfort, are not the subject of consultation.
We found a higher frequency of incisional hernias after surgery for acute generalized peritonitis. The occurrence of incisional hernia is influenced by several factors. Clinically, wound infections and obesity are the most commonly reported factors [9] . Wound infections occur especially at the course of contaminated surgery or dirty surgery. In a tropical environment, acute generalized peritonitis is often due to ileal or gastric perforation [10] . Their treatment constitutes a contaminated surgery, which accounts for the frequency of incisional hernias.
As for the etiology, incisional hernias were more frequent after vertical midline incision. The type of incision, the closing techniques and the equipment used are also etiological factors ofincisional hernias [11] [12] . Vertical midline incisions have a higher risk ofincisional hernia than Pfannenstiel incision [7] [13] .
Therapeutically, open suture repair has been the most used technique. This situation is due to the high cost of prostheses, which makes them less accessible in our context. The alternative might be the assessment of safer suture techniques like the one described by Lázaro Da Silva, which would give results comparable to those of the prosthetic treatment [7] .
5. Conclusion
In rural areas of Burkina Faso, incisional hernias occur in young patients. Peritonitis and occlusions are the main indications of first surgery. The vertical midline incisions are involved in more than half of the cases. Prostheses are less accessible financially. As such, the treatment mainly involves open suture repair with a high rate of recurrence. The technique of Lázaro Da Silva could be an alternative choice.