Share This Article:

Under the Flag of Blue and White: Mary as an A-NationalSymbol in the Greek-Orthodox Community in Israel

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:104KB) PP. 230-237
DOI: 10.4236/sm.2011.14029    4,865 Downloads   8,057 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Marian devotion and rituals have been the apex of Christian believers’ journey for centuries. In spite of its importance in many disciplines, Marian devotion and rituals in Israel have been neglected. In this article I will outline several social and religious aspects of Marian devotion in the Greek-Orthodox community in Israel. Using several case-studies of Marian devotion around the world I will address the question is Mary a national symbol in Israel? Since one of the most important Marian devotion sites is located in Israel and centered in Mary’s place of ascension in Gethsemane, addressing this site directly is crucial. I will express a new concept more fitting to the Israeli case—Mary as an a-national symbol. This research is based upon a combination of two main methodologies: participant observations and in-depth interviews with believers (local Greek and Palestinian residents as well as pilgrims) and clergymen. The research focuses on a procession taking place in the Old City of Jerusalem in the end of August, celebrating Mary’s legacy and resurrection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Ventura, J. (2011). Under the Flag of Blue and White: Mary as an A-NationalSymbol in the Greek-Orthodox Community in Israel. Sociology Mind, 1, 230-237. doi: 10.4236/sm.2011.14029.

References

[1] Bilu, Y. (2005). Shushbiney hakdoshim. Haifa: Haifa University Press.
[2] Bosca, R. (2005). Evita: A case of political canonization. In J. Hopgood (Ed.), The making of saints: Contesting sacred ground (pp. 59-74). Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.
[3] Bowman, G. (1991). Christian ideology and the image of a holy land: The place of Jerusalem pilgrimage in the various Christianities. In J. Eade, & M. Sallnow (Eds.), Contesting the Sacred (pp. 98-121). London: Routledge.
[4] Bowman, G. (1993). Nationalizing the sacred: Shrines and shifting identities in the Israeli-occupied territories. Man, 28, 431-460. doi:10.2307/2804234
[5] Bowman, G. (2001). The violence in identity. In B. Schmidt, & I. Schr?der (Eds.), Anthropology of violence and conflict (pp. 25-46). New York: Routledge.
[6] Bowman, G. (2003). Constitutive violence and the nationalist imaginary: Antagonism and defensive solidarity in ‘Palestine’ and ‘Former Yugoslavia’. Social Anthropology, 11, 319-340.
[7] Connell, J. (1992). The visions of the children: The apparition of the blessed mother at Medjugorje. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
[8] Dahlberg, A. (1991). The body as a principle of holism: Three pilgrimages to lourdes. In J. Eade, & M. Sallnow (Eds.), Contesting the sacred (pp. 30-50). London: Routledge.
[9] Davis, P., & Boles, J. (2003). Pilgrim apparition work: Symbolization and crowd interaction when the Virgin Mary appeared in Georgia. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 32, 371-402. doi:10.1177/0891241603253492
[10] Dubisch, J. (1995). In a different place: Pilgrimage, gender and politics at a Greek Island Shrine. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[11] Durkheim, é. (1965). The elementary forms of the religious life. New York: Free Press.
[12] Eade, J., & Sallnow, M. (1991). Introduction. In J. Eade, & M. Sallnow (Eds.), Contesting the sacred (pp. 1-29). London: Routledge.
[13] Eliade, M. (1991). Images and symbols: Studies in religious symbolism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[14] Eliade, M. (2005). The myth of the eternal return. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
[15] Fawrot Peterson, J. (1991). The virgin of Guadalupe: Symbol of conquest or liberation? Art Journal, 51, 39-47. doi:10.2307/777283
[16] Galbraith, M. (2000). On the road to Czestochowa: Rhetoric and experience on a polish pilgrimage. Anthropological Quarterly, 73, 61-73.
[17] Gluckman, M. (1962). Les rites de passage. In M. Gluckman (Ed.), Essays on the ritual of social relations (pp. 1-52). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
[18] Geertz, C. (1976). From the native’s point of view: On the nature of anthropological understanding. In K. Basso, & H. Selby (Eds.), Meaning in anthropology (pp. 221-237). Albuqeurque: University of New Mexico Press.
[19] Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places. New York: The Free Press.
[20] Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. New York: Anchor Books.
[21] Handelman, D. (1990). Models and mirrors: Towards an anthropology of public events. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[22] Harris, R. (1999). Lourdes: Body and spirit in the secular age. London and New York: Allen Lane the Penguin Press.
[23] Hill, J. (1987). Medhugorje. Concord: Center for Peace.
[24] Horsfall, S. (2000). The experience of Marian apparitions and the Mary cult. The Social Science Journal, 37, 375-384. doi:10.1016/S0362-3319(00)00075-6
[25] Jurkovich, J., & Gesler, W. (1997). Medjugorje: Finding peace at the heart of conflict. Geographical Review, 87, 447-467. doi:10.2307/215225
[26] Juschka, D. (2003). Whose turn is it to cook? Communitas and pilgrimage questioned. Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature, 36, 189-204.
[27] Kselman, T. A. (1978). Miracles and prophesies: Popular religion and the church in nineteen-century France, unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan.
[28] Ortner, S. (1979). On key symbols. In W. Armand, & E. Zartman Vogt (Eds.), Reader in comparative religion (pp. 92-98).. New York: Allyn & Bacon.
[29] Perry, N., & Echeverría, L. (1988). Under the heel of Mary. Routledge: London and New York.
[30] Pervan, T. (1987). Our lady is guiding the community. In J. Hill (Ed.), Medjugorje (pp. 19-23). Concord: Center for Peace.
[31] Sa’ar, A. (1998). Carefully on the margins: Christian Palestinians in Haifa between Nation and State. American Ethnologist, 25, 215-239. doi:10.1525/ae.1998.25.2.215
[32] Seraidari, K. (2001). La vierge de tinos: Le couer sacre de l’état grec. Archives de Science Sociales des Religions, 46, 45-59.
[33] Sered, S. (1991). Rachel, Mary and Fatima. Cultural Anthropology, 6, 131-146. doi:10.1525/can.1991.6.2.02a00010
[34] Sklar, D. (2005). The footfall of words: A reverie on walking with Nuestra senora de Guadalupe. Journal of American Folklore, 118, 9- 20. doi:10.1353/jaf.2005.0012
[35] Skrbis, Z. (2005). The apparitions of the virgin Mary of Medjugorje: The convergence of Croatian nationalism and her apparitions. Nations and Nationalism, 11, 443-461. doi:10.1111/j.1354-5078.2005.00213.x
[36] Sudetic, C. (1993). A shrine in Bosnia is now illuminated by rockets. New York Times. September 26th.
[37] Turner, V. (1992). Blazing the trail: Way marks in the exploration of symbols. Tucson & London: The University of Arizona Press.
[38] Turner, V. (1995). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. New Jersey: Aldine transaction.
[39] Turner, V., & Turner, E. (1978). Image of pilgrimage in Christian culture. New York: Columbia University Press.
[40] Van Gennep, A. (1960). The rites of passage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[41] Ventura, J. (2011). Conflict and strife on the way to Gethsemane. Israel affairs. in Press.
[42] Vokunic, B. (1992). Medjugorje’s religion and tourism connection. Annals of Tourism Research, 19, 79-91. doi:10.1016/0160-7383(92)90108-2
[43] Weingrod, A. (1990). The saint of beersheba. Albany: SUNY Press.
[44] Wolf, E. (1958). The virgin of Guadalupe: A Mexican national symbol. The Journal of American Folklore, 71, 34-39. doi:10.2307/537957
[45] Zimders-Swartz, S. (1991). Encountering Mary: From la Salette to Medjugorje. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.