Share This Article:

A Study of Neutron and Gamma-Ray Interaction Properties with Cobalt-Free Highly Chromium Maraging Steel

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:385KB) PP. 1526-1532
DOI: 10.4236/jmp.2015.611156    3,443 Downloads   3,802 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Cobalt-free maraging steels of different compositions have been prepared by electro-slag remelting technique using titanium and chromium instead of cobalt. Neutron removal cross-sections have been calculated, also mass attenuation coefficients and effective electron densities have been determined for the prepared samples in the photon energy range up to 2.8 MeV. Other steel alloys and lead samples have also been investigated for the sake of comparison. The results prove the superiority of cobalt-free maraging steels compared with the other steel types to be used as a proper shielding material in the nuclear field. Among the investigated steels, the steel “0.045%C- 13.35%Ni-2.05%Cr-4.5%Mo-0.06%Ti” has the best attenuation properties.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Kassab, M. , El-Kameesy, S. , Eissa, M. and Abdel-Latif M, A. (2015) A Study of Neutron and Gamma-Ray Interaction Properties with Cobalt-Free Highly Chromium Maraging Steel. Journal of Modern Physics, 6, 1526-1532. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2015.611156.

References

[1] Kim, Y.G., et al. (1986) Materials Science and Engineering, 79, 133-140.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0025-5416(86)90396-4
[2] Leslie, W.C. and Hornbogen, E. (1996) Chapter 17—Physical Metallurgy of Steels. Physical Metallurgy. 4th Edition, R. W. Cahn and P. Haasen, Oxford, 1555-1620.
[3] Prokoshkina, V.G. and Kaputkina, L.M. (2006) Materials Science and Engineering, 438-440, 222-227.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.02.075
[4] He, Y., et al. (2006) Metallurgical & Materials Transactions, 37, 1107-1116.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11661-006-1089-4
[5] Sha, W., et al. (2012) Materials Science and Engineering, A536, 129-135.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.12.086
[6] Dautovich, D.P. (1976) Corrosion, 3, 64-76.
[7] Wood, J.I. (1982) Computational Methods in Reactor Shielding. Pergamon Press, New York.
[8] El-Khayatt, A.M. and Akkurt, I. (2013) Annals of Nuclear Energy, 60, 8-14.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.04.021
[9] Kurudirek, M., et al. (2011) Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 80, 855-862.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2011.03.015
[10] Gong, J., et al. (2001) Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 282, 325-328.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3093(01)00341-6
[11] Akkurt, I. and El-Khayatt, A.M. (2013) Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 295, 633-638.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-2111-5
[12] Erdem, M., et al. (2010) Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 79, 917-922.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2010.04.009
[13] Yilmaz, E., et al. (2011) Annals of Nuclear Energy, 38, 2204-2212.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2011.06.011

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.