Share This Article:

Autonomy, Choice, and Pupils’ Motivation—Are They Really Related?

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:1120KB) PP. 84-93
DOI: 10.4236/ape.2015.52011    2,311 Downloads   2,975 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Examining the differences in motivation between learners in schools with a choice-based physical education (PE) curriculum and those with a non-choice-based curriculum, and identifying which sport activities these students prefer, using SDT as a conceptual framework. Method: Participants were 536 pupils from grades 10 - 12 from eight schools. Four schools offered a choice- based curriculum in PE and the other operated according to a teacher-based curriculum. A questionnaire examined their PA habits in leisure time, their motives for activity in PE lessons, and their preferred activities in these lessons. Results showed that pupils in classes with no choice-based curricula reported higher levels of motives then pupils in classes with choice-based curricula. Girls reported higher level of motives than boys. Preferred areas of activity illustrated the traditional-social difference between boys and girls. Conclusion: Schools that offer choice-based curricula should sharpen the answer to the question-what constitutes a worthwhile or true choice.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Zach, S. and Yanovich, E. (2015) Autonomy, Choice, and Pupils’ Motivation—Are They Really Related?. Advances in Physical Education, 5, 84-93. doi: 10.4236/ape.2015.52011.

References

[1] Barker, D., Quennerstedt, M., & Annerstedt, C. (2013). Inter-Student Interactions and Student Learning in Health and Physical Education: A Post-Vygotskian Analysis. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2013.868875
[2] Barnes, J. S., & Spray, C. M. (2013). Social Comparison in Physical Education: An Examination of the Relationship between Two Frames of Reference and Engagement, Disaffection, and Physical Self-Concept. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 1060-1072.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.21726
[3] Bryan, C. L., & Solmon, M. A. (2012). Student Motivation in Physical Education and Engagement in Physical Activity. Journal of Sport Behavior, 35, 267-285.
[4] Bryan, C. L., Sims, S. K., Hester, D. J., & Dunaway, D. L. (2013). Fifteen Years after the Surgeon General’s Report: Challenges, Changes, and Future Directions in Physical Education. Quest, 65, 139-150.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2013.773526
[5] Condon, R., & Collier, C. S. (2002). Student Choice Makes a Difference in Physical Education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 73, 26.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2002.10607750
[6] Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The Domain of Creativity. In M. A. Runco, & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of Creativity (pp. 190-212). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
[7] Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Wolfe, R. (2000). New Conceptions and Research Approaches to Creativity: Implications of a Systems Perspective for Creativity in Education. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent (2nd ed., pp. 81-93). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
[8] Davis, G. (2004). Creativity Is Forever (5th ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt.
[9] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Motivation, Personality, and Development within Embedded Social Contexts: An Overview of Self-Determination Theory. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation (pp. 85-107). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0006
[10] Decorby, K., Halas, J., Dixon, S., & Wintrup, L. (2005). Classroom Teachers and the Challenges of Delivering Quality Physical Education. The Journal of Educational Research, 98, 208-221.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.4.208-221
[11] Feldman, D. H. (1999). The Development of Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The Handbook of Creativity (pp. 243-270). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[12] Ferrer-Caja, E., & Weiss, M. R. (2000). Predictors of Intrinsic Motivation among Adolescent Students in Physical Education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 267-279.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2000.10608907
[13] Grimminger, E. (2013). Sport Motor Competencies and the Experience of Social Recognition among Peers in Physical Education—A Video-Based Study. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 18, 506-519.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2012.690387
[14] Jaakkola, T., & Liukkonen, J. (2006). Changes in Students’ Self-Determined Motivation and Goal Orientation as a Result of Motivational Climate Intervention within High School Physical Education Classes. International Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 4, 302-324.
[15] Johnson, D. A. (2005). The Effect of Choice on Motivation. The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 76, 13-26.
[16] Johnson, T. G., Prusak, K. A., Pennington, T., & Wilkinson, C. (2011). The Effects of the Type of Skill Test, Choice, and Gender on the Situational Motivation of Physical Education Students. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30, 281-295.
[17] Kaplan, H., & Glasner, A. (2014). Project Based Learning: To Learn with Sparkling Eyes from Autonomy Motivation and Self-Determination. Kolot, 9, 19-23. (In Hebrew)
[18] Lima, B. S. C., & Wang, C. K. J. (2007). Perceived Autonomy Support, Behavioral Regulations in Physical Education and Physical Activity Intention. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 10, 52-60.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.06.003
[19] Lonsdale, C., Sabiston, C. M., Raedeke, T. D., Ha, A. S. C., & Sum, R. K. W. (2009). Self-Determined Motivation and Students’ Physical Activity during Structured Physical Education Lessons and Free Choice Periods. Preventive Medicine, 48, 69-73.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.09.013
[20] Marsh, H. W., Bar-Eli, M., Zach, S., & Richards, G. E. (2006). Construct Validation of Hebrew Versions of Three Physical Self-Concept Measures: An Extended Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 28, 310-343.
[21] Morgan, K., Kingston, K., & Sproule, J. (2005). Effects of Different Teaching Styles on the Teacher Behaviors That Influence Motivational Climate and Pupil Motivation in Physical Education. European Physical Education Review, 11, 257-285.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1356336X05056651
[22] Ntoumanis, N. (2001). A Self-Determination Approach to the Understanding of Motivation in Physical Education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 225-242.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709901158497
[23] Ommundsen, Y. (2006). Pupils’ Self-Regulation in Physical Education: The Role of Motivational Climates and Differential Achievement Goals. European Physical Education Review, 12, 289-315.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1356336X06069275
[24] Papaioannou, A., Bebetsos, E., Theodorakis, Y., Christodoulidis, T., & Kouli, O. (2006). Causal Relationships of Sport and Exercise Involvement with Goal Orientations, Perceived Competence and Intrinsic Motivation in Physical Education: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24, 367-382.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640410400022060
[25] Prusak, K. A., Treasure, D. C., Darst, P. W., & Pangrazi, R. P. (2004). The Effects of Choice on the Motivation of Adolescent Girls in Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 23, 19-29.
[26] Reeve, J., & Hyungshim, J. (2006). What Teachers Say and Do to Support Students’ Autonomy during a Learning Activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 209-218.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.209
[27] Rosenkranz, R. R., Lubans, D., Peralta, L. R., Bennie, A., Sanders, T., & Lonsdale, C. (2012). A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial of Strategies to Increase Adolescents’ Physical Activity and Motivation during Physical Education Lessons: The Motivating Active Learning in Physical Education (MALP) Trial. BMC Public Health, 12, 834-842.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-834
[28] Rubin, Y., & Raviv, S. (1999). Motives for Physical Activity of High-School Students. Be’Tnua, 5, 205-224. (In Hebrew)
[29] Sansock, J. (2007). A Topical Approach to Life Span Development (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
[30] Shuhong, W., Xiaomeng, Z., & Martocchio, J. (2011). Thinking Outside of the Box When the Box Is Missing: Role Ambiguity and Its Linkage to Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 211-221.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.595661
[31] Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2006). Students’ Motivational Processes and Their Relationship to Teacher Ratings in School Physical Education: A Self-Determination Theory Approach. American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 77, 100-110.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2006.10599336
[32] Vilhjalmsson, R., & Kristjansdottir, G. (2003). Gender Differences in Physical Activity in Older Children and Adolescents: The Central Role of Organized Sport. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 363-374.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00042-4
[33] Wallhead, T. L., Garn, A. C., & Vidoni, C. (2013). Sport Education and Social Goals in Physical Education: Relationships with Enjoyment, Relatedness, and Leisure-Time Physical Activity. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 18, 427-441.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2012.690377
[34] Ward, J., Wilkinson, C., Graser, S., & Prusak, K. A. (2008). Effects of Choice on Student Motivation and Physical Activity Behavior in Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27, 385-398.
[35] Watkin, B. (1978). Measurement of Motivation for Participation in Physical Activity. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Psychological Assessment in Sport (pp. 188-194). Netanya: Wingate Institute for Physical Education and Sport.
[36] Xiang, P., McBride, R. E., & Bruene, A. (2006). Fourth-Grade Students’ Motivational Changes in an Elementary Physical Education Running Program. American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 77, 195-207.
[37] Yew Meng, H., Whipp, P., Dimmock, J., & Jackson, B. (2013). The Effects of Choice on Autonomous Motivation, Perceived Autonomy Support, and Physical Activity Levels in High School Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 32, 131-148.
[38] Zach, S., & Lidor, R. (2002). Cross-Boundary Measurement Tools: The Case of the Coping Resources Questionnaire. Bitnuah, 6, 122-148. (In Hebrew)
[39] Zach, S., Zeev, A., Dunsky, A., Goldbourt, U., Shimony, T., Goldsmith, R., & Netz, Y. (2012). Adolescents’ Physical Activity Habits—Results from a National Health Survey. Child: Care, Health, & Development, 39, 103-108.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.