Are the Criteria for Health and Safety Available in Adjustable Saudi School Furniture?

Khalid Al Saleh, Mohamed Ramadan

.

DOI: 10.4236/ib.2011.32027                

Abstract

This research investigated the effect of adjustable Saudi chair-table combinations available in the local market on the students' health and safety. Thirty seven young students participated in this research. Ten chair-table combinations, within three different activities (reading, writing, and looking at the blackboard), were the independent variables. Normalized discomfort ratings, and neck dorsal and upper trapezius muscular activities were the dependent variables. Variances among students' body dimensions and classroom furniture were also studied. There were higher levels of neck dorsal and upper trapezius muscular contractions associated with less dimensions of chair-table combinations compared to high dimensions of chair-table combinations. Normalized discomfort ratings at the neck, shoulder, thigh, and feet were significantly higher at high chair-table dimensions. Matched school furniture to the student dimensions was associated with low dimensions of chair-table combinations. The suitability of the local adjustable chair-table combination was not fit to the students’ health. Saudi furniture industry should review and provide the local schools with the most appropriate furniture to Saudi students’ anthropometric dimensions.

Keywords

School Furniture, Discomfort Scale, Human Factors, EMG, Furniture Design, Anthropometry

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	P. Grimes and S. J. Legg, “Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSD) in School Students as a Risk Factor for Adult MSD: A Review of the Multiple Factors Affecting Posture, Comfort and Health in Classroom Environments,” Journal of the Human-Environmental System, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2004, pp. 1-9. doi:10.1618/jhes.7.1
[2]	E. N. Corlett, “Are You Sitting Comfortably?” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 24, No. 1, 1999, pp. 7-12.
[3]	I. M. Al-Harkan, M. Z. Ramadan, M. A. Sharaf and H. A. Helmy, “Design, Development, and Implementation of School Furniture for Saudi School Students,” Tech. Rep. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, KACST project NO. AT-20-49, No. 2, 2002.
[4]	I. M. Al-Harkan, M. Z. Ramadan, M. A. Sharaf and H. A. Helmy, “Design, Development, and Implementation of School Furniture for Saudi School Students,” Final Tech. Rep.# 5, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, KACST project NO. AT-20-49, 2005.
[5]	J. K. Wingrat and C. E. Exner, “The Impact of School Furniture on Fourth Grade Children’s on-Task and Sitting Behavior in the Classroom: A Pilot Study,” Work, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2005, pp. 263-272.
[6]	J. Pynt, J. Higgs and M. Mackey, “Seeking the Optimal Posture of the Seated Lumbar Spine,” Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2001, pp. 5-21. doi:10.1080/09593980151143228
[7]	L. Saarni, C. Nygard, A. Rimpela, T. Nummi and A. Kaukiainen, “The Working Postures Among Schoolchildren- A Controlled Intervention Study on the Effects of Newly Designed Workstations,” Journal of school Health, Vol. 77, No. 5, 2007, pp. 240-247. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00199.x
[8]	L. A. Saarni, A. H. Rimpela, T. H. Nummic, A. Kaukiainen, J. J. Salminen and C. Nygard, “Do Ergonomically Designed School Workstations Decrease Musculoskeletal Symptoms in Children? A 26-Month Prospective Follow-Up Study,” Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2009, pp. 491–499. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2008.09.011
[9]	C. Joanne and T. Wong, “Anthropometric Evaluation for Primary School Furniture Design,” Ergonomics, Vol. 50, No. 3, 2007, pp. 323-334. doi:10.1080/00140130600842328
[10]	M. Marschall, A. Harrington and J. Steele, “Effect of Work Station Design on Sitting Posture in Young Children,” Ergonomics, Vol. 38, No. 9, 1995, pp. 1932-1940. doi:10.1080/00140139508925241
[11]	A. C. Mandal, “The Correct Height of School Furniture,” Human Factors, Vol. 24, No. 3, 1982, pp. 257-269.
[12]	N. B. Diep, “Evaluation of Fitness Between School Furniture and Children Body Size in Two Primary Schools in Haiphonh, Vietnam,” Master’s Thesis, Department of Human Work Sciences, Lulea University of Technology, 2003.
[13]	British Standards Institution, “Educational Furniture: Specification for Functional Dimensions, Identification and Finish of Chairs and Tables for Educational Institutions,” British Standards Institition, London, 1980.
[14]	M. K. Gouvali and K. Boudolos, “Match Between School Furniture Dimensions and Children’s Anthropometry,” Applied Ergonomics, 37, No. 6, 2006, pp. 765-773. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2005.11.009
[15]	S. Milanese and K. Grimmer, “School Furniture and the User Population: An Anthropometric Perspective. Ergonomics,” Vol. 47, No. 4, 2004, pp. 416-426. doi:10.1080/0014013032000157841
[16]	M. Mokdad and M. Al-Ansari, “Anthropometrics for the Design of Bahraini School Furniture,” International Journal Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2009, pp. 1-8.
[17]	J. R. Cram, G. S. Kasman and J. Holtz, “Introduction to Surface Electromyography,” 1st Edition, Aspen Publishers, Frederick, 1998.
[18]	NIOSH, “Selected Topics in Surface Electromyography for Use in the Occupational Setting: Expert Perspectives. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,” US Department of Health and Human Services, 1992, pp. 24-41.
[19]	J. G. Proakis and D. G. Manolakis, “Digital Signal Processing Principles. Algorithms, and Applications,” 3rd Edition, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, New York, 1996.
[20]	W. S. Marras, “Industrial Electromyography (EMG) Guidelines,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1990, pp. 89-93. doi:10.1016/0169-8141(90)90054-6
[21]	W. Bauer and T. Wittig, “Influence of Screen and Copy Holder Positions on Head Posture, Muscle Activity and User Judgment,” Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 29, No. 3, 1998, pp. 185-192. doi:10.1016/S0003-6870(97)00060-4
[22]	M. K. Chung, I. Lee and D. Kee, “Assessment of Postural Load for Lower Limb Postures Based on Perceived Discomfort,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2003, pp. 17-32. doi:10.1016/S0169-8141(02)00115-4
[23]	C. Parcells, M. Stommel and R. P. Hubbard, “Mismatch of Classroom Furniture and Student Body Dimensions. Empirical Findings and Health Implications,” Journal of Adolescent Health, Vol. 24, No. 4, 1999, pp. 265-273. doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(98)00113-X
[24]	S. J. Legg, F. I. Trevelyan, M. P. Carpentier and B. Fuchs, “Spinal Musculoskeltal Discomfort in New Zealand Intermediate Schools,” The Proceedings of the 15th Cogress of the International Ergonomics Association, Ergonomics for Children in Educational Environments Symposium, Seoul, No. 6, 2003, pp. 336-338.
[25]	S. J. Legg, K. Pajo, M. Sullman and M. Marfell-Jones, “Mismatch between Classroom Furniture Dimensions and Student Anthropometric Characteristics in Three Zealand Secondry Schools,” The Proceedings of the 15th Cogress of the International Ergonomics Association, Ergonomics for Children in Educational Environments Symposium, No. 6, Seoul, 2003, pp.395-397.
[26]	S. Murphy, “The Occurrence of Back Pain and Associated Risk Factors in Schoolchildren. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,” University of Surrey, Guildford 2003.
[27]	D. Chaffin and G. Anderson, “Occupational Biomechanics,” Wiley, New York, 1991.
[28]	M. H. Noweir, A. O. Bafail and I. M. Jomoah, “Anthropometric Norms of Saudi Population,” A final report of the research project no. (603/417), King Abdul-Aziz University, 2001.
[29]	G. Knight and J. Noyes, “Children’s Behavior and the Design of School Furniture,” Ergonomics, Vol. 42, No. 5, 1999, pp. 747-760. doi:10.1080/001401399185423