Share This Article:

Prediction and Derivation of the Higgs Boson from the Neutron and Properties of Hydrogen Demonstrating Relationships with Planck’s Time, the Down Quark, and the Fine Structure Constant

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:2919KB) PP. 1670-1683
DOI: 10.4236/jmp.2014.516167    3,064 Downloads   3,611 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

A high accuracy Higgs boson, H0, is an important physical constant. The Higgs boson is associated with the property of mass related to broken symmetry in the Standard Model. The H0 mass cannot be derived by the Standard Model. The goal of this work is to derive and predict the mass of H0 from the subatomic data of the frequency equivalents of the neutron, electron, Bohr radius, and the ionization energy of hydrogen. H0’s close relationships to the fine structure constant, α, the down quark, and Planck time, tP are demonstrated. The methods of the harmonic neutron hypothesis introduced in 2009 were utilized. It assumes that the fundamental constants as frequency equivalents represent a classic unified harmonic system where each physical constant is associated with a classic harmonic integer fraction. It has been demonstrated that the sum exponent of a harmonic integer fraction, and a small derived linear δ value of the annhilation frequency of the neutron, vn, 2.2718591 × 1023 Hz, (vns) as a dimensionless coupling constant represent many physical constants as frequency equivalents. This is a natural unit system. The harmonic integer fraction series is 1/±n, and 1 ± 1/n for n equals 1 to ∞. The H0 is empirically and logically is associated with harmonic fractions, 1/11 and 1 + 1/11. α-1 is associated with 11. α-1 is a free space scaling constant for the electromagnetic force so it is logical that 11 should also have a pair, but for a free space mass constant. Also there should be a harmonic faction pair for the down quark, 1 - 1/11, just as there is pairing of the up quark, 1 - 1/10, and top quark, 1 + 1/10. The harmonic neutron hypothesis has published a method deriving a high accuracy Planck time, tP from the same limited subatomic data. The δ line for H0 should be closely associated with tP since they both are related to mass. The preferred derived value related to tP2 is 125.596808 GeV/c2. A less attractive derived value is 125.120961 GeV/c2 from the weak force factors only. The experimental CMS and Atlas value ranges are 125.03+0.26+0.13-0.27-0.15 and 125.36±0.37±0.18 GeV/c2. Empirically the H0 δ line is closely related to the same factors of the tP δ line, but with inverse sign of the slope. The H0 completes the paring of a free space constant for mass, the down quark, and an inverse sign δ line factors with tP. It is possible to accurately derive the mass of H0 from subatomic physical data. The model demonstrates that H0 is closely associated with α, the down quark, and tP. This prediction can be scrutinized in the future to see if it is accurate. The model has already published accurate predictions of the masses of the quarks.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Chakeres, D. (2014) Prediction and Derivation of the Higgs Boson from the Neutron and Properties of Hydrogen Demonstrating Relationships with Planck’s Time, the Down Quark, and the Fine Structure Constant. Journal of Modern Physics, 5, 1670-1683. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2014.516167.

References

[1] Higgs, P.W, (1964) Physical Review Letters, 13, 508-509.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.508
[2] Iso, S. (2013) What Can We Learn from the 126 GeV Higgs Boson for the Planck Scale Physics Hierarchy Problem and the Stability of the Vacuum? arXiv:1304.0293
[3] Gherghetta, T., von Harling, B., Medina, A.D. and Schmidt, M.A. (2013) The Scale-Invariant NMSSM and the 126 GeV Higgs Boson. arXiv:1212.5243v2
[4] Carena, M., Beringer, J., et al., Particle Data Group (2012, 2013) Physical Review D, D86, Article ID: 010001. (2012 and 2013 Partial Update for the 2014 Edition).
[5] CMS Collaboration (2012) Physics Letters B, 716, 30-61. arXiv:1207.7235. Bibcode:2012PhLB..716...30C.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021
[6] ATLAS Collaboration (2012) Physics Letters B, 716, 1-29. arXiv:1207.7214. Bibcode:2012PhLB..716....1A.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020
[7] Chakeres, D.W. (2009) Particle Physics Insights, 2, 1-20.
[8] Chakeres, D.W. (2011) Particle Physics Insights, 4, 19-23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/PPI.S7961
[9] Chakeres, D.W. (2011) Particle Physics Insights, 4, 25-31.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/PPI.S8241
[10] Chakeres, D.W. (2013) Particle Physics Insights, 6, 1-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/PPI.S12390
[11] Chakeres, D.W. (2011) Particle Physics Insights, 4, 33-38.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/PPI.S8269
[12] Chakeres, D.W. (2012) The Harmonic Neutron Hypothesis: Alpha and the Annihilation Frequency Equivalent of the Neutron Are Sufficient to Derive the Effective Fine Structure Constant at Z American Physical Society Poster.
[13] Chakeres, D.W. (2006) The Imaginary Number Neutron Symphony. US Copyright, TXu1-295-777.
[14] Lykken, J. and Spiropulu, M. (2014) Scientific American, 310, 34-39.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0514-34

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.