Share This Article:

Intonation Metaphor

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:2515KB) PP. 495-504
DOI: 10.4236/ojml.2014.44042    5,625 Downloads   6,414 Views  
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

As an important concept in Systemic Functional Grammar (SFG), grammatical metaphor can be categorized into ideational metaphor, interpersonal metaphor, arguably logical metaphor and textual metaphor on the basis of metafunctions. Ever since its initiation, grammatical metaphor, ideational metaphor in particular, has captured extensive attention from scholars throughout the world and various aspects including its categorization, motivation, realization, meaning and so on have been investigated. However, viewed from the perspective of language system, previous studies have been mainly focused on the stratum of lexicogrammar. Few have been directed at the phonological stratum which realizes lexicogrammar. It is suggested that phonological stratum also manifests such a metaphorical phenomenon. This paper will attempt to conduct an investigation on what we call intonation metaphor in this stratum in terms of its realization, motivation, semantics and functions. In addition, relationships among metaphors on the three linguistic strata will also be tentatively investigated.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Jiang, C. (2014) Intonation Metaphor. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 4, 495-504. doi: 10.4236/ojml.2014.44042.

References

[1] Chen, X. R. (2014), A Pragma-Cognitive Account of Grammatical Metaphor. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2, 33-41.
[2] Cong, Y. X. (2011). On the restraint and expansion of ideational grammatical metaphor. Journal of Foreign Languages, 5, 46-53.
[3] Fan, W. F (2001). Yufayinyulilunyanjiu (Theoretical Studies of Grammatical Metaphor). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
[4] Goatly, A. (1993). Species of Metaphor in Written and Spoken Varieties. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Register Analysis Theory and Practice (pp. 110-148). London: Pinter.
[5] Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (1st ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
[6] Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
[7] Halliday, M. A. K. (1998). Things and Relations: Regrammaticizing Experience as Technical Knowledge. In J. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science (pp. 185-235). London: Routledge.
[8] Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
[9] Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). Oxon: Routledge.
[10] He, Q.S. (2013). Textual metaphor from the non-finite clausal perspective. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 4, 308-313.
[11] Holme, R. (2003). Grammatical Metaphor as a Cognitive Construct. In A. M. Simon-Vandenbergen, M. Taverniers, & L. J. Ravelli (Eds.), Grammatical Metaphor: Views from Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 391-415). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/cilt.236.21hol
[12] Hu, Z. L. (1996). Grammatical Metaphor. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 4, 1-7.
[13] Hu, Z. L. (2000). A Review of Halliday’s Grammatical Metaphor. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 2, 89-94.
[14] Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
[15] Lin, Z. J., & Yang, Z. (2010). A Study of Semantic Relations and Rank-Shift Directions in Grammatical Metaphor. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 6, 403-410.
[16] Liu, C. Y. (2003). The Stylistic Value of Grammatical Metaphor. Modern Foreign Language, 2, 120-127.
[17] Liu, C. Y. (2005). Ideational and Interpersonal Metaphors: Opposite Rank-Shifts. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 4, 289-293.
[18] Ma, Y. L., & Tao, M. Z. (2007). Grammatical Metaphor, Construction, Analogical Mapping. Foreign Language Education, 1, 40-44.
[19] Martin, J. (1992). English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/z.59
[20] Ravelli, L. (1988). Grammatical Metaphor: An Initial Analysis. In E. Steiner, & R. Velman (Eds.), Pragmatics, Discourse and Text: Some Systemically-Inspired Approaches (pp. 133-147). London: Pinter.
[21] Taverniers, M. (2003). Grammatical Metaphor in SFL: A Historiography of the Introduction and Initial Study of the Term. In A. M. Simon-Vandenbergen, M. Taverniers, & L. J. Ravelli (Eds.), Grammatical Metaphor: Views from Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 5-33). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/cilt.236.02tav
[22] Veltman, R. (2003). Phonological Metaphor. In A. M. Simon-Vandenbergen, M. Taverniers, & L. J. Ravelli (Eds.), Grammatical Metaphor: Views from Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 5-33). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/cilt.236.17vel
[23] Yan, S. Q. (2000). Metaphor, Metaphorization and Demetaphorization. Suzhou: Soochow University Press.
[24] Yan, S. Q. (2003). The Development of the Grammatical Metaphor Theory and Its Theoretical Implications. Journal of Foreign Languages, 3, 51-57.
[25] Yang, B. (2013). Ideational Grammatical Metaphor: A Cognitive Perspective. Journal of Foreign Languages, 5, 27-35.
[26] Zhang, D. L., & Dong, J. (2014). On the Developmental Models of Grammatical Metaphor. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 1, 32-44.
[27] Zhang, D. L., & Lei, Q. (2013). Studies on Grammatical Metaphors in China. Foreign Language Education, 3, 51-57.
[28] Zhang, D. L., & Zhao, J. (2008). On the Formal Similarity Principle in Ideational Grammatical Metaphor between Congruent and Metaphorical Forms. Journal of Foreign Languages, 6, 25-32.
[29] Zhu, Y. S. (2006). On Nominalization, Verbalization and Grammatical Metaphor. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 2, 83-90.
[30] Zhu, Y. S., & Yan, S. Q. (2000). Contributions and Limitations of Halliday’s Grammatical Metaphor Theory. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 2, 95-102.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.