Effect of Tubular Chiralities and Diameters of Single Carbon Nanotubes on Gas Sensing Behavior: A DFT Analysis ()
1. Introduction
Monitoring of combustible gas alarms, gas leak detection, and environmental pollution is of great concern in public security. Advances in nanotechnology give great promise for achieving new sensing materials. Since the discovery of carbon nanotubes in 1991, the single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) have been intensively investigated as nanoscale gas sensors because of their great surface areas to bulk ratio and their abilities to modulate electrical properties upon adsorption of various kinds of gas molecules [1] -[17] . The emission of carbon and nitrogen oxides (CO, CO2, NO and NO2) results from the combustion of fossil fuels, contributing to both smog and acid precipitation, and affecting both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems [18] . Although many efforts have been made to use catalysts to reduce the amount of carbon or nitrogen oxides in the air [19] -[25] , an efficient method of sensing and removing carbon and nitrogen oxides is still required.
Because carbon and nitrogen oxides are the most dangerous air pollutants, toxic and global warming gases, our work is concentrated on investigating the effect of tubular chiralities and diameters of single carbon nanotubes on gas sensing behavior for CO, CO2, NO and NO2 gas molecules, applying the first principle calculations.
2. Computational Methods
All calculations were performed with the density functional theory as implemented within G03W package [26] - [29] , using B3LYP exchange-functional and applying basis set 6 - 31g (d,p). Pure carbon nanotubes and, and are fully optimized with spin average as well as the adsorption of CO, CO2, NO and NO2 gas molecules.
The obtained diameters [30] and the adsorption energies of gas molecules on CNTs (Eads) [31] are calculated from the following relations:
where n and m are integral numbers, the composition of chiral vector.
where is the total energy of nanotube and gas molecules, is the energy of the carbon nanotube, and is the energy of gas molecules.
3. Results and Discussion
We will investigate the adsorption of gas molecules, CO, CO2, NO and NO2 on four carbon nanotubes with different charilities and diameters CNT, CNT, CNT and CNT as shown in Figure 1 and Table 1.
3.1. Adsorption of CO, CO2, NO and NO2 Gas Molecules on CNTs
We have adsorbed CO and CO2 gas molecules vertically on different three positions of, , and CNTs: above a carbon atom (carbon site), above a bond between two carbon atoms (bond site) and above a center of a hexagon ring (vacant site). The calculated adsorption energies of CO and CO2 gas molecules
are listed in Table 2. It is found that the best position and adsorption energy for CO gas molecule is above the bond site on CNT with adsorption energy of −0.43 eV, however for CO2 gas molecule is above the vacant site on CNT with adsorption energy of −0.26 eV. Therefore, one can conclude that the best CNT gas sensor for CO and CO2 gas molecules is the CNT.
Also, we have adsorbed NO and NO2 gas molecules vertically on different three positions of, , and CNTs: above a carbon site, above a bond site and above a vacant site. The calculated adsorption energies of NO and NO2 gas molecules are listed in Table 3. It is found that the best adsorption energies of NO gas molecule are on the CNT above a bond site, then above a carbon site and after that above a vacant site with adsorption energies of −1.65 eV, −1.55 eV and −1.34 eV, respectively. However, for NO2 gas molecule is found to be above the bond site on CNT with adsorption energy of −1.75 eV. Also, it is noticed that the vacant site is always preferred for NO2 gas adsorption on all the studied CNTs except for CNT. Therefore, one can conclude that all CNTs can be used as gas sensors for NO and NO2 gas molecules.
From Table 2, Table 3, one can investigate the effect of the chiralities and the diameters on the CNT gas sensors behavior. It is clear that the adsorption of CO and CO2 gas molecules is dependent on the chiralities and the diameters of CNTs. The adsorption of CO and CO2 gas molecules is enhanced with increasing the diameter of the zig-zag CNTs. However, the adsorption of NO and NO2 gas molecules is independent on the chiralities and the diameters of CNTs.
3.2. Energy Gaps of Adsorbed CO, CO2, NO and NO2 Gas Molecules on CNTs
From Table 4, it is clear that the adsorption of CO and CO2 gas molecules on CNTs does not affect the elec
Table 1. The configuration structures and diameters of the studied CNTs.
tronic character of the CNTs. Also, the band gaps of pristine CNTs and the adsorbed CO and CO2 gas molecules on CNTs are so close.
From Table 5, the adsorption of NO and NO2 gas molecules on CNTs is strongly affected the electronic character of the and CNTs. However, there is not any change of the electronic character for and CNTs. The band gap of pristine CNT is increased from 0.70 eV to 1.61 eV and to 1.37 eV when NO and NO2 gas molecules are adsorbed on it, respectively. Also, The band gap of pristine CNT is increased from 0.25 eV to 1.34 eV and to 1.25 eV when NO and NO2 gas molecules are adsorbed on it, respectively. One can conclude that the electronic character of, , and CNTs is not affected by the adsorption of CO and CO2 gas molecules. The adsorption of NO and NO2 gas molecules on CNTs is only strongly affected the electronic character of the and CNTs, however the and CNTs are not affected at all.
3.3. HOMO-LUMO Orbitals of Adsorbing CO, CO2, NO and NO2 Gas Molecules on CNTs
Our calculated band gaps show that the adsorption of CO and CO2 gas molecules on CNTs is not affected the band gaps of the pristine CNTs, however the adsorption of NO and NO2 gas molecules is strongly affected the band gaps. To explain that the molecular orbitals of adsorbing CO, CO2, NO and NO2 gas molecules on, , and CNTs are investigated, see Figure 2, Figure 3. The band gaps of the pristine CNTs are calculated and are listed in Table 4. The HOMO and LUMO energy orbitals for pristine, , and CNTs are found to be (−4.13 eV, −3.42 eV), (−3.93 eV, −3.68 eV), (−4.62 eV, −2.82 eV) and (−4.70 eV, −2.82 eV), respectively. Comparing the HOMO-LUMO energies of the pristine CNTs with ones after the adsorption of CO and CO2 gas molecules, it is clear that the energy values are so close. Also, it is noticed that there is not any contribution from the gas molecules at the molecular orbitals and the electron density of HOMO and LUMO is distributed over all the carbon atoms of CNTs except for CNT is located at the terminals of the tube, see Figure 2. Comparing the HOMO-LUMO energies of the pristine CNTs with ones after the adsorption of NO and NO2 gas molecules, it is clear that the energy values are so close in case of and CNTs and are quite far in case of and CNTs. The HOMO energy levels in case of and CNTs after adsorbing NO and NO2 gas molecular are getting deep (lower) in energy however the LUMO energy levels are getting higher in energy. Results in increasing the band gap from 0.70 eV to 1.81 eV in
case of CNT and from 0.25 eV to 1.34 eV in case of CNT. Also, it is noticed that there is representation from the NO gas molecule at LUMO of and CNTs, see Figure 3.
3.4. The Reactivity of CNT Surfaces before and after Adsorbing Gas Molecules
Our calculated band gaps and molecular orbitals show that the adsorption of CO and CO2 gas molecules on CNTs is not affected neither the band gaps nor the molecular orbitals of the pristine CNTs but the adsorption of NO and NO2 gas molecules is strongly affected both of the band gaps and the molecular orbitals of and CNTs. To clear that the reactivity of CNT surfaces before and after adsorbing CO, CO2, NO and NO2 gas molecules on, , and CNTs are studied, see Table 6, Table 7. The surface reactivity of the pristine CNTs is calculated and is listed in Table 6. The dipole moments of pristine, , and CNTs are found to be 0.54 Debye, 0.20 Debye 0.00 Debye and 0.00 Debye, respectively.
Comparing the dipole moments of the pristine CNTs with ones that are adsorbed the CO and CO2 gas molecules, it is clear that the dipole moment values are so close in case of the adsorption of the CO gas molecule but they are higher in case of the adsorption of the CO2 gas molecule, see Table 6. Also, it is noticed that the highest dipole moments after the adsorption of the CO2 gas molecule are 0.74 Debye (when CO2 is adsorbed above the bond site of CNT) and 0.77 Debye (when CO2 is adsorbed above the vacant site of CNT), re-
spectively. Comparing the dipole moments of the pristine CNTs with ones that are adsorbed the NO and NO2 gas molecules, it is found that the dipole moments are getting higher. When the NO and NO2 gas molecules are adsorbed on the vacant sites of CNTs, their dipole moments are either quite close to or are lower than the dipole moments of pristine CNTs, except in case of adsorbing NO2 on CNT, the dipole moment is increased. Also, all the calculated dipole moments of adsorbing NO and NO2 gas molecules on the carbon sites of CNTs
are increased, except in case of adsorbing NO2 on CNT, the dipole moment is decreased. In case of adsorbing NO and NO2 gas molecules on the bond sites of CNTs the dipole moments are also increased, except in case of adsorbing NO2 on CNT is decreased, see Table 7.
From Table 6, Table 7, it is clear that the dipole moments of zig-zag and CNTs are always higher than the arm-chair and CNTs. Also, it is noticed that the dipole moment of adsorbing NO gas molecule on the bond site of CNT is increased by ten times comparing with the dipole moment of pristine CNT.
4. Conclusion
The gas sensing behavior of CNTs, considering a range of different nanotube diameters and chiralities, as well as different adsorption sites is reported. The adsorption of CO, CO2, NO, and NO2 gas molecules on the, , and CNTs are studied using B3LYP/6-31 g(d, p). Three different adsorption sites (above a carbon site, a bond site and a vacant site) are applied on CNTs. It is found that the adsorption of CO and CO2 gas molecules is dependent on the chiralities and the diameters of CNTs and it is enhanced with increasing the diameter of the zig-zag CNTs. However, the adsorption of NO and NO2 gas molecules is independent on the chiralities and the diameters of CNTs. Also, the electronic character of, , and CNTs is not affected by the adsorption of CO and CO2 gas molecules. While, the adsorption of NO and NO2 gas molecules on CNTs is only strongly affected by the electronic character of the and CNTs but the and CNTs are not affected at all. It is found that the dipole moments of zig-zag and CNTs are always higher than the arm-chair and CNTs. Also, it is noticed that the dipole moment of adsorbing NO gas molecule on the bond site of CNT is increased by ten times compared with the dipole moment of pristine CNT. Therefore, these findings prove that the zig-zag carbon nanotubes are better than the arm-chair carbon nanotubes as gas sensors, especially for NO and NO2 gas molecules.
NOTES
*Corresponding author.