Share This Article:

Study of the Standard Insurance Provisions’ Interpretation

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:319KB) PP. 206-209
DOI: 10.4236/jss.2014.24021    7,317 Downloads   8,356 Views  
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

The new insurance law has been implemented for a long time, but it is still disputed frequently for the application of standard insurance clause. We can see this from many cases, e.g. the Sued People’s Insurance Company of China LLC, Jinyun Branch office Insurance contract Dispute Case by Li Shangzhi. This paper is trying to take the standard insurance clause as the beginning point to briefly analyze the reason for the terms’ understanding differences and to study their unfavorable interpretation principle through comparing the provisions’ samples in the old and new insurance law, which can be looked forward to providing some ideas for their corresponding practice.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Yang, Y. (2014) Study of the Standard Insurance Provisions’ Interpretation. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 206-209. doi: 10.4236/jss.2014.24021.

References

[1] Wang, L.M. (2002) The Law Research for Contract. 2nd Edition, China Renmin University Press Ltd., Beijing.
[2] The Magic Weapon of Peking University (2009) Zhejiang Jinyun County People’s Court Civil Written Judgment 2009 Li Red Business Character No. 984.
http://vip.chinalawinfo.com
[3] Shi, W.S. (1985) General Expositions of Insurance Law. 2nd Edition, San Min Book Press Ltd., Taiwan.
[4] Ren, Y.S. (2009) Research for the Interpretation Principle to the Formatted Clause of Insurance Contract-Discussed the Revised Value for the Article 30st of New Insurance Law. Journal of Insurance Research, 12, 110-114.
http://bxyj.journalsystem.net/ch/index.aspx
[5] Knox, M.R. (1985) Insurance Contract: Rule of Construction, Judicial, Consumerism, and Coverage. 1st Edition, New L.J., London.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.