Altitudinal Distribution of Papilionidae Butterflies along with Their Larval Food Plants in the East Himalayan Landscape of West Bengal, India

Abstract

The altitudinal distribution of Papilionidae butterflies across the East Himalayan Landscape of West Bengal, India is presented here. 26 butterfly species are known to occur across 11 altitudinal belts. Species Richness (R) and Species Diversity (H′) are said to be highest between 1200 - 1400 masl (meters above sea level). In contrast, lowest values of Species Richness and Species Diversity occur at the highest altitude of 3000 masl and above. Maximum number of individuals occurs between 900 - 1100 masl while the minimum number of individuals was present at the highest altitude of 3000 masl or above. 35 species of plants belonging to 6 families served as the larval food plant of these butterflies. Thus the presence of suitable larval host plants probably governs the altitudinal distribution of these papilionid species of butterflies. 30.77% of butterfly species are strictly monophagous in nature.

Share and Cite:

Ghorai, N. and Sengupta, P. (2014) Altitudinal Distribution of Papilionidae Butterflies along with Their Larval Food Plants in the East Himalayan Landscape of West Bengal, India. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 2, 1-8. doi: 10.4236/jbm.2014.21001.

1. Introduction

Bacterial adaptations to environmental changes are, in part, dependent on inter-cell and inter-kingdom communication [1] [2] . Human hormones, e.g. insulin and dehydroepiandrosterone and neurotransmitters, e.g. norepinephrine have been reported to function as interkingdom communication signals [1] [3] -[7] . These chemical signals trigger alterations in population phenotype, including virulence-associated factors [8] . Identification of novel signaling compounds can lead to identification of new target pathways for antimicrobial development.

Various classes of compounds, including peptides and steroids have been identified as signaling compounds for Staphylococcus aureus [5] [9] -[11] . S. aureus is an important community-acquired and nosocomial pathogen that produces endogenous (vitamin K2) for respiration [12] -[16] . However, the role that extracellular menaquinone plays in bacterial physiology is not known. The potential effects of exogenous menaquinone on S. aureus is an important question since in vivo staphylococci are exposed to menaquinone, an essential factor for hemostasis in humans [14] [17] [18] .

The focus of this study is to determine if exogenous menaquinone, a vitamin, affects S. aureus virulenceassociated phenotypes, i.e., capsule production, biofilm formation and carotenoid production [19] .

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Menaquinone (K2; Sigma-Aldrich), was stored at −20˚C until use. Prior to use it was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) then diluted in medium. Because of its photo-reactivity, all experiments were done solely under yellow light (570 - 580 nm) to avoid photo-oxidation.

2.2. Bacterial Strains & Growth Kinetics

S. aureus strains used are indicated in Table 1. S. aureus parent strain 8325-4, and agr, sarA and agrsarA strains, which are highly characterized, were a generous gift from S. Foster. Bacterial growth rate and maximal growth were determined using a semi-automated system as previously described [20] . Briefly, overnight cultures of S. aureus strains in Mueller Hinton (MH) broth were added to fresh MH (104 and 106 CFU/ml final concentration). The bacterial suspension (100 µl) was added to serially diluted (two-fold) menaquinone in MH (100 µl/well; 0.001 - 12 μg/ml; flat-bottom honey-comb plates; Bioscreen C; Growth Curves USA). The plates were incubated in the Bioscreen C for 24 hrs (37˚C, continuous shaking). Generation times were calculated per formula (Bioscreen C). Controls consisted of organisms grown in medium alone and organisms grown in medium with the highest concentration of DMSO used (1 ml DMSO/dl MH). Experiments were done in quadruplicate and repeated at least twice for a total of three independent measures (n = 12).

2.3. Biofilm Assay & Capsule Production

Organisms (Table 1) grown overnight in MH were used to inoculate fresh homologous medium to 2 × 104 and 2 × 106 CFU/ml final concentration. Bacteria were added to microtiter plates (100 µl/well; 96 well untreated flat-bottom) containing two-fold serially diluted in MH of menaquinone (100 µl/well; 0.001 - 12 μg/ml). After incubation (24 hr, 37˚C, static, humid chamber) the plates were emptied, washed, and air dried. After drying, the plates were stained with 300 µl of commercially prepared Gram’s crystal violet (biofilm formation; Troy Biologicals), or with 300 µl of Alcian blue (1% w/v DDW) which stains acidic polysaccharide, e.g., capsule [20] -[22] . After the plates were thoroughly rinsed and dried, the stain was dissolved in absolute alcohol (300 µl).

Table 1. Staphylococcus aureus strains used in this study.

Absorbance was determined by spectrophotometer reading (Abs595 nm and Abs490 nm, respectively). Controls consisted of organisms grown in medium alone and organisms grown in medium with the highest concentration of DMSO used (1 ml DMSO/dl MH). For all strains tested, DMSO, at the highest concentration tested (1 ml DMSO/dl MH), had no measurable effect on biofilm levels as compared to the medium alone control. Experiments were done in quadruplicate and repeated at least twice (n = 12).

2.4. Biofilm Formation on Fibronectin

Biofilm formation on human fibronectin-coated 96-well microplates (1 μg fibronectin/well; R & D Systems) was done essentially as described above for plastic with the exception that in addition to the serially diluted menaquinone (0.05 - 12 μg/ml MH) menaquinone at 0.5 and 0.005 ng/ml MH were tested. For all strains tested, DMSO, at the highest concentration tested (1 ml DMSO/dl MH), had no measurable effect on biofilm formation on fibronectin as compared to the medium alone control. Experiments were done in triplicate and repeated at least twice (n = 9).

2.5. Carotenoid Formation

Measurement of carotenoid levels was done essentially as described by Morikawa, et al. [23] . Organisms were grown in MH as described above in the absence and presence of menaquinone (4 μg/ml, 0.5 μg/ml, 0.05 μg/ml). After 24 hrs, the cells were harvested from 850 μl of culture and washed (H2O, 25˚C, 3578 xg, 3 min.). The cell pellets were suspended in methanol (200 μl; Sigma-Aldrich), heated, (55˚C, 3 min.) and centrifuged (3578 xg, 3 min.). The supernatant was removed, the cell pellet re-extracted (200 µl methanol, 55˚C, 3 min) and centrifuged (3578 xg, 3 min.). This supernatant was added to the previous supernatant and the cell pellet discarded. To the 400 μl of cell extract, 600 µl of methanol was added to a total of 1 ml with absorbance read at 465 nm. Controls consisted of organisms grown in medium alone and organisms grown in medium with the highest concentration of DMSO used (1 ml DMSO/ dl MH). Methanol was used as the blank for spectrophotometry. In addition, the effect of various concentrations of menaquinone on colony appearance was assessed by visual inspection using the standard spread plate method (MH agar with menaquinone). Experiments were done in triplicate and repeated at least twice (n = 9).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data were evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA; GraphPad InStat 3.06 for Windows, GraphPad Software Inc.). Mean values were considered significantly different at p < 0.05.

3. Results

The effect of various menaquinone concentrations on S. aureus ATCC 25923 biofilm formation and production of capsular polysaccharide was assessed (Figures 1(a) and (b)). Menaquinone (0.01 - 0.09 µg/ml) caused a significant (p < 0.05) concentration specific increase in the level of S. aureus biofilm formation on plastic, which was also dependent upon bacterial density (Figure 1(a)). Biofilm formation on plastic was significantly increased at the lowest bacterial density tested (104 CFU/ml). As had been previously reported for S. aureus ATCC 25923, menaquinone, regardless of concentration, had no significant effect on doubling time and maximum absorbance for any of the strains tested (Table 1; data not shown) [20] . Thus, the effect menaquinone had on biofilm formation was independent of growth rate or final bacterial density. In addition, menaquinone had no significant effect on capsule production regardless of strain or initial concentration tested (Figure 1(b)).

The effective response range for menaquinone was 0.05 - 4 µg/ml (Figure 2), with biofilm formation on fibronectin significantly increased (p < 0.05) for wild type and clinical isolates (MSSA and MRSA), as compared to parent and agr mutant strains. In contrast, biofilm formation on fibronectin of S. aureus agr-sarA and sarA strains was similar to controls, regardless of the menaquinone concentration tested. No response was seen at menaquinone concentrations of 5 ng/ml or 12 µg/ml (data not shown). Menaquinone concentrations yielding the highest levels of fibronectin-associated biofilm formation as compared to control are shown in Table 2. The highest levels of biofilm formation were measured for the clinical MSSA (M48155) and MRSA (S38506) isolates, whose biofilm levels were 4.3 and 6.1 fold higher than vitamin K-free control, respectively.

The effect of menaquinone (0.005, 0.05, 0.5 and 4 μg/ml) on carotenoid production by each of the strains

(a)(b)

Figure 1. Effect of menaquinone (0.01 - 6 μg/ml) on S. aureus ATCC 25923 populations. (a) Biofilm formation on plastic. Biofilm formation on plastic by two populations (104 CFU/ml; 106 CFU/ml) of S. aureus. Organism biofilm formation after growth (24 hrs. 37˚C, static) in Mueller Hinton medium (pH 7) at various levels of menaquinone was evaluated spectrophotometrically (Abs595 nm). (b) Capsule formation. Production of acidic polysaccharide by two populations (104 CFU/ml; 106 CFU/ml) of S. aureus. Capsule production after growth (24 hrs. 37˚C) in Mueller Hinton medium (pH 7) at various levels of menaquinone was evaluated spectrophotometrically (Abs490 nm). Each bar (mean ± SEM) represents three independent measures performed in quadruplicate (n = 12). *Indicates significant difference (p < 0.05) between biofilm levels in the presence of menaquinone and medium control.

Figure 2. Effect of menaquinone (0.05 - 4.0 µg/ml) on formation of biofilm by S. aureus strains on fibronectin. Menaquinone was evaluated for its ability to affect S. aureus biofilm formation on fibronectin (1 μg/well) as determined spectrophotometrically (Abs595 nm). Each bar (mean ± SEM) represents three independent measures performed in triplicate (n = 9). *Indicates significant difference (p < 0.05) from medium control.

Table 2. Effect of menaquinone on S. aureus biofilm formation on fibronectin.

aMenaquinone concentration at peak biofilm levels; bMean ± SEM; three independent measures (n = 9); cMaximum Abs595 of S. aureus in the presence of menaquinone/Abs595 of S. aureus medium control; dSignificantly different (p < 0.05) from medium control.

(Table 1) was assessed both visually (colony color) and through direct cell extraction methodology. Regardless of the method used, menaquinone did not appear to affect the level of carotenoid formation (Abs465nm 0.03 ± 0.006).

4. Discussion

The present study is the first report of a vitamin affecting phenotype expression. Menaquinone’s effect on S. aureus was concentration specific in a manner analogous to what has been described for other inter-kingdom quorum signaling compounds [7] [9] . The ability to recognize the host environment and alter phenotype expression so as to establish an infectious process is controlled through recognition of a variety of environmental conditions, including the presence of chemical signaling compounds [1] [8] . Similar to other host-derived exogenous chemical signaling molecules, menaquinone’s effects on biofilm formation on plastic (measure of surface hydrophobicity; alteration in S. aureus cell surface architecture) were population size dependent [2] [20] . Since there was no significant difference in total growth, regardless of menaquinone concentration, the differences in biofilm levels were the result of menaquinone-induced cell surface changes, and not differences in total growth levels. Similar to previous reports on biofilm formation in S. aureus, menaquinone-mediated biofilm formation on plastic appears to be independent of either the presence of capsule, or changes in carotenoid production. The menaquinone concentrations affecting S. aureus biofilm formation on fibronectin spanned a broad range with the break-point for S. aureus response determined to be between 0.5 ng/ml and 0.005 ng/ml (data not shown). In normal human plasma the levels of exogenous vitamin K range from 0.1 - 2.2 ng/ml plasma, with plasma levels ≤0.5 ng/ml corresponding to impaired blood coagulation [23] [24] . Thus, the effects of menaquinone on biofilm formation may have clinical relevancy since in individuals with normal clotting function S. aureus would be exposed to levels of vitamin K that are sufficient to enhance biofilm formation in vitro. We hypothesize that plasma vitamin K levels would promote in vivo biofilm formation on fibronectin-coated surfaces, e.g. prosthetic joints. In addition, the staphylococcal response to such a broad vitamin concentration range may play a role in staphylococcal survival during abscess formation and persistence, since concentrated menaquinone levels would be expected in the encapsulated environment of an abscess [12] [15] .

As anticipated, the global gene regulator sarA regulates biofilm formation in response to menaquinone [25] . Of interest is the observation that the level of S. aureus agr cells binding to fibronectin was significantly increased as compared to its parent strain. This suggests that agr plays a negative regulatory role in S. aureus response to menaquinone.

5. Conclusion

The vitamin menaquinone, at human plasma levels, exhibits characteristics analogous to interkingdom quorum-like signaling compounds. Vitamin K enhances capsule-independent biofilm formation on both plastic surfaces and fibronectin. The response to exogenous vitamin K signaling appears to be under sarA regulation. This vitamin K-mediated pathway in biofilm formation may provide an additional target for development of targeted antimicrobials [22] .

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by Midwestern University Office of Research and Sponsored Programs, Midwestern University Biomedical Sciences Program and the American Osteopathic Association (D. Kirby).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Smetacek, P. (2011) On the Anomalous Altitudinal Distribution of West Himalayan Troidini and Papilionini (Papilio-nidae). Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society, 65, 126-132.
[2] Kehimkar, I. (2008) The Book of Indian Butterflies. Bombay Natural History Society, Oxford University Press.
[3] Joshi, P.C. and Arya, M. (2007) Butterfly Communities along Altitudinal Gradients in a Protected Forest in the Western Himalayas, India. The Natural History Journal of Chulalongkorn University, 7, 1-9.
[4] Smith, C. (1994) Butterflies of Nepal. Craftsman Press, Bangkok.
[5] Singh, A.P. (2012) Lowland Forest Butterflies of the Sankosh River Catchment, Bhutan. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 4, 3085-3102. http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o2625.3085-102
[6] Maude, E.W. (1949) List of Butterflies Caught in Darjeeling District between 1700 and 4400 ft. Parts I, II, III, and IV. Journal of Bengal Natural History Society, 23, 86-92.
[7] Das, R.P., Saha, G.K., De, J.K. and Sanyal, A.K. (2012) Diversity and Habitat Preferences of Butterflies in Gorumara National Park, West Bengal, India. Journal of research in Biology, 2, 303-314.
[8] MOEF (Ministry of Environment and Forests) (1990) Joint Forest Management Resolution, of Environment, Forests and Wildlife. Government of India, New Delhi, India.
[9] Kunte, K. (1997) Seasonal Patterns in Butterfly Abundance and Species Diversity in Four Tropical Habitats in Northern Western Ghats. Journal of Bioscience, 22, 593-603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02703397
[10] Rodgers and Panwar (1988) Planning a Wildlife Protected Area Network in India. 2 vol. Project FO: IND/82/003, FAO, Dehradun, 339, 267.
[11] Mandal, S. (2007) Wild fauna of Gorumara National Park, Jalpaiguri, West Bengal. Intas Polivet, 8, 257-261.
[12] Mallick, J.K. (2010) Status of Red Panda Ailurus fulgens in Neora Valley National Park, Darjeeling District, West Bengal, India. Small Carnivore Conservation, 43, 30-36.
[13] Pollard, E. (1977) A Method for Assessing Changes in the Abundance of Butterflies. Biological Conservation, 12, 115-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(77)90065-9
[14] Evans, J.H. (1932) Identification of Indian Butterflies. Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai.
[15] Wynter-Blyth, M.A. (1957) Butterflies of the Indian Region. Bombay Natural History Society.
[16] Haribal, M. (1992) The Butterflies of Sikkim Himalaya and their natural history. Sikkim. Sikkim Natural Conservation Foundation.
[17] Kunte, K. (2000) Butterflies of Peninsular India. Indian Academy of Sciences, Bangalore. University Press, Hyderabad.
[18] Cowan, A. and Cowan, J.M. (1979) The Trees of Northern Bengal Including Shrubs, Woody Climber, Bamboos, Palms and Tree Ferns. Naaz Offset Press, Delhi.
[19] Polunin, O. and Stainton, A. (2005) Flowers of the Himalaya. Seventh Impression. Oxford University Press, New Delhi.
[20] Maity, D. and Maiti, G.G. (2007) The Wild Flowers of Kanchenjunga Biosphere Reserve, Sikkim, Naya Udyog, Kolkata.
[21] Das, A.P., Bhujel, R.B. and Lama, D. (2008) Plant Resources in the Protected Areas and Proposed Corridors of Darjeeling, India, In: Chettri, N., Shakya, B. and Sharma, E., Eds., Biodiversity Conservation in the Kangchenjunga Landscape, Hill Side Press (P.) Ltd., Kathmandu, 56-79.
[22] Shannon, C.E. (1948) A mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423,623- 656.
[23] Magurran, A.E. (1988) Ecological Diversity and Its Measurements. University Press, Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7358-0
[24] García-Barros, E. and Fartmann, T. (2009) Butterfly Oviposition: Sites, Behaviour and Modes. In: Settele, J., Shreeve, T., Konvi?ka, M. and Van Dyck, H., Eds., Ecology of Butterflies in Europe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 29-42.
[25] Kerr, J.T. (2001) Butterfly Species Richness Patterns in Canada: Energy, Heterogeneity, and Potential Consequences of Climate Change. Conservation Ecology, 5. http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss1/art10
[26] Kerr, J.T, Southwood, T.R.E. and Cihlar, J. (2001) Remotely Sensed Habitat Diversity Predicts Butterfly Species Richness and Community Similarity in Canada. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 98, 11365- 11370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.201398398
[27] Choi, S.W. (2004) Trends in Butterfly Species Richness in Response to the Peninsular Effect in South Korea. Journal of Biogeography, 31, 587-592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.01007.x
[28] Bhusal D.R, and Khanal, B. (2008) Seasonal and Altitudinal Variation of Butterflies in Eastern Siwalik of Nepal. Journal of Natural History Museum, 23, 82-87.
[29] Rakbek, C. (1995) The Elevational Gradient of Species Richness: A Uniform Pattern? Ecography, 18, 200-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1995.tb00341.x
[30] Quinn, R.M., Gaston K.J. and Roy D.B. (1998) Coincidence in the Distribution of Butterflies and Their Foodplants. Ecography, 21, 279-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1998.tb00565.x
[31] Gutierrez D, and Mendez, R. (1995) Phenology of Butterflies in a Mountain Area in Northern Iberian Peninsula. Ecography, 18, 209-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1995.tb00123.x
[32] Cowley, M.J.R., Thomas, C.D., Wilson, R.J., Leon-Córtes, J.L., Gutiérrez, D. and Bulman, C.R. (2001) The Density and Distribution of British Butterflies. II. An Assessment of Mechanisms. Journal of Animal Ecology, 70, 426-441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2001.00509.x
[33] Uniyal, V.P. (2007) Butterflies in the Great Himalayan Conservation Landscape in Himachal Pradesh, Western Himalaya. Entomon, 32, 119-127.
[34] Slansky, F. (1993) Nutritional Ecology: The Fundamental Quests for Nutrients. In: Stamp, N.E. and Casey, T.E., Eds., Caterpillars-Ecological and Evolutionary Constraints on Foraging, Champion and Hall, New York, 29-91.
[35] Lawton, J.H. (1983) Plant Architecture and the Diversity of Phytophagous Insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 28, 23-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.28.010183.000323
[36] Basset, Y. (1991) The Seasonality of Arboreal Arthropods Foraging within an Australian Rainforest Tree. Ecological Entomology, 16, 265-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1991.tb00217.x
[37] Leather, S.R. (1990) The Analysis of Species-Area Relationships, with Particular Reference to Macrolepidoptera on Rosaceae: How Important Is Insect Data-Set Quality? Entomologist, 109, 8-16.
[38] Williams, P.H., Humphrics, C.J. and Gaston, K.J. (1994) Centres of Seed-Plant Diversity: The Family Way. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 256, 67-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1994.0050
[39] Scriber, J. M., Tsubaki, Y. and Lederhouse, R.C. (1995) Swallowtail Butterflies: Their Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. Scientific Publishers, Gainesville, Florida.
[40] Barua, K.K., Slowik, J., Bobo, K.S. and Muehlenberg, M. (2010) Correlations of Rainfall and Forest Type with Papilionid Assemblages in Assam in Northeast India. Psyche, 2010, 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/560396
[41] Robinson, G.S., Ackery, P.R., Kitching, I.J., Beccaloni, G.W and Hernández, L.M. (2001) Hostplants of the Moth and Butterfly Caterpillars of the Oriental Region. Southdene Sdn Bhd and Malaysian Nature Society, Malaysia.
[42] Polunin, O. and Stainton, A. (1984) Flowers of the Himalaya. Oxford University Press, New Delhi.
[43] Barua, K.K., Kakati, D. and Kalita, J. (2004) Present Status of Swallowtail Butterflies in Garbhanga Reserve Forest, Assam, India. Zoos’Print Journal, 19, 1439-1441. http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.ZPJ.1000.1439-41

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.