Share This Article:

Zone II Flexor Tendon Repair in a 13-Month-Old: Report of a Complication

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:1988KB) PP. 15-20
DOI: 10.4236/ojo.2014.41003    3,441 Downloads   5,067 Views  

ABSTRACT

Despite early cautions against the primary repair of zone II flexor tendon injuries, recent advances in surgical technique and suture materials have allowed such repairs to become commonplace. The 6-strand repair technique is rarely applied to the young pediatric population, however, to our knowledge, no English-language articles have described this method of primary repair in zone II of children less than 2 years old. A 13-month-old male presented flexor digitorum profundus repair after lacerating it in zone II on a sharp aluminum can. The tendon was repaired with a 6-strand technique, using a 4.0 Fiberloop for the core suture and 6.0 Prolene for the epitendinous suture. Approximately four months after surgery, the patient developed a palmar collection at the level of his middle phalanx and a serosanguinous sinus tract at the distal interphalangeal crease. During the revision surgery, the inspection of the repaired tendon revealed a small gap filled with scar tissue. There was no evidence of new fistula formation at his final visit one month after the second procedure. After the revision, the patient could move his digit with minimal loss of range of motion at the distal interphalangeal joints. Unfortunately, he was subsequently lost to follow up. This surgical technique was selected to provide a strong repair that would allow the early postoperative movement. In retrospect, a 6-strand repair with braided suture is not ideal in young children as the bulky suture can cause a foreign-body reaction and possibly extrude through the skin. Additionally, the immobilization with a long-arm cast remains a valuable tool after tendon repair in infants who cannot voluntarily restrict their movements.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

J. Panattoni and M. Ahmed, "Zone II Flexor Tendon Repair in a 13-Month-Old: Report of a Complication," Open Journal of Orthopedics, Vol. 4 No. 1, 2014, pp. 15-20. doi: 10.4236/ojo.2014.41003.

References

[1] R. A. E. Clayton and C. M. Court-Brown, “The Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Tendinous and Ligamentous Injuries,” Injury, Vol. 39, No. 12, 2008, pp. 1338-344.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.06.021
[2] M. A. Badalamente and E. Wang, “Collagenase in the Treatment of Zone II Flexor Tendon Adhesions in the Hand,” In: Clinical Trials.gov [Internet], National Library of Medicine (US), Bethesda.
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00261209?term=NCT00261209&rank=1
[3] I. R. MacArthur, S. Logsetty and L. J. Sigurdson, “The Effects of a Stainless Steel Suture MGH Flexor Tendon Repair Coupled with Early Aggressive Range of Motion Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial,” In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. National Library of Medicine (US), Bethesda.
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01344980?term=NCT01344980&rank=1
[4] G. Andreisek, “FLEX-Trial: Prospective Sonographic Assessment of Healing Process Following Suture of Profound Flexor Tendon Due to Traumatic Rupture of FDP-Tendon in Zone II,” In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. National Library of Medicine (US), Bethesda (MD).
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01013428?term=NCT01013428&rank=1
[5] S. Bunnell, “Surgery of the Hand,” 3rd Edition, J. B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, 1948.
[6] C. E. Verdan, “Primary Repair of Flexor Tendons,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, Vol. 42A, 1960, pp. 123-127.
[7] H. E. Kleinert, J. E. Kutz, T. S. Ashbell and E. Martinez, “Primary Repair of Lacerated Flexor Tendons in ‘No Man’s Land’,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, Vol. 49A, 1967, p. 577.
[8] G. D. Lister, H. E. Kleinert, J. E. Kutz and E. Atasoy, “Primary Flexor Tendon Repair Followed by Immediate Controlled Mobilization,” The Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. 2, No. 6, 1977, pp. 441-451.
[9] J. W. Strickland, “Development of Flexor Tendon Surgery: Twenty-Five Years of Progress,” The Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2000, pp. 214-235.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2000.0214
[10] R. T. Thurman, T. E. Trumble, D. P. Hanel, A. F. Tencer and P. K. Kiser, “Two-, Fourand Six-Strand Zone II Flexor Tendon Repairs: An in Situ Biomechanical Comparison Using a Cadaver Model,” The Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1998, pp. 261-265.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80124-X
[11] B. H. Lim and T. M. Tsai, “The Six-Strand Technique for Flexor Tendon Repair,” Atlas of The Hand Clinics, Vol. 1, 1996, pp. 65-76.
[12] B. Miller, S. D. Dodds, A. deMars, N. Zagoreas, T. Waitayawinyu and T. E. Trumble, “Flexor Tendon Repairs: The Impact of Fiberwire on Grasping and Locking Core Sutures,” The Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. 32, No. 5, 2007, pp. 591-596.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.03.003
[13] T. Karjalainen, M. He, A. K. Chong, A. T. Lim and J. Ryhanen, “An Analysis of the Pull out Strength of 6 Suture Loop Configurations in Flexor Tendons,” The Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2011, pp. 217-223.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.10.039
[14] J. R. Doyle, “Anatomy of the Flexor Tendon Sheath and Pulley System,” The Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. 13, No. 4, 1988, pp. 473-484.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(88)80082-0
[15] H. Kato, A. Minami, N. Suenaga, N. Iwasaki and T. Kimura, “Long-Term Results after Primary Repairs of Zone 2 Flexor Tendon Lacerations in Children Younger than Age 6 Years,” Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Vol. 22, No. 6, 2002, pp. 732-735.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01241398-200211000-00007
[16] J. M. Brunner, “The Zig-Zag Volar Digital Incision for Flexor Tendon Surgery,” Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 40, 1967, pp. 571-574.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-196740060-00010
[17] R. S. Gill, B. H. Lim, R. A. Shatford, E. Toth, M. J. Voor and T. M. Tsai, “A Comparative Analysis of the Six Strand Double-Loop Flexor Tendon Repair and Three Other Techniques: A Human Cadaveric Study,” The Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. 24, No. 6, 1999, pp. 1315-1322.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.1999.1315
[18] J. Nishida and P. C. Amadio, “Flexor Tendon Interaction after Pulley Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study in a Human Model in Vivo,” The Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1998, pp. 665-672.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80053-1
[19] S. W. Wolfe, R. N. Hotchkiss, W. C. Pederson and S. H. Kozin, “Green’s Operative Hand Surgery,” 6th Edition, Churchill Livingstone, New York, 2010.
[20] W. L. Newmeyer and P. R. Manske, “No Man’s Land Revisited: The Primary Flexor Repair Controversy,” The Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2004, pp. 1-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(03)00381-2
[21] I. Kessler and F. Nissim, “Primary Repair without Immobilization of Flexor Tendon Division within the Digital Sheath: An Experimental and Clinical Study,” Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, Vol. 40, 1969, pp. 587-601.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453676908989524
[22] S. J. O’Connell, M. M. Moore, J. W. Strickland, G. T. Frasier and P. C. Dell, “Results of Zone I and Zone II Flexor Tendon Repairs in Children,” The Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1994, pp. 48-52.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0363-5023(94)90223-2

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.