Synthesis and controlled release of cloprop herbicides from cloprop-layered double hydroxide and cloprop-zinc-layered hydroxide nanocomposites ()
KEYWORDS
Cloprop; Cloprop-Layered Double Hydroxide; Cloprop-Zinc-Layered Hydroxide; Nanocomposite; Controlled Release; Kinetic Study
1. INTRODUCTION
Environmental problems associated with the use of highly mobile herbicides are of current concern because of the increasing presence of these agrochemicals in ground and surface waters. Anionic herbicides are of particular concern because they are weakly retained by most of the components of soil sediment, so they remain dissolved in the soil solution and can rapidly move around [1]. One approach to minimizing such transport losses is to use controlled release formulation in which the herbicides are incorporated in a matrix or carrier before application, thereby limiting the amount available for unwanted processes [2]. In this study, LDHs with general formula of
and LMHs with general formula represented by
have been chosen to be studied as herbicides controlled release formulation. M2+ is the metallic cation such as Mg2+, Zn2+, Co2+, Ni2+ and M3+ is a trivalent metal ion such as Al3+, Fe3+, Cr3+, Ga3+, Ni3+, Mn3+ [3,4]. A is a counterion with n− charge [5]. This is a safe herbicide system to minimize and prevent the herbicides from direct exposure to environment. Due to these properties, LDH and LMH have a huge opportunity in industrial and environmental research as absorbent [6], chemical sensor [7-9], catalyst [10], drug delivery
[11] and controlled release formulation [12]. Co-precipitation method has been used to prepare clopropZn/Al-layered double hydroxide (cloprop-LDH), meanwhile, cloprop-zinc-layered hydroxide (cloprop-ZLH) is prepared by using a direct reaction method. Cloprop (2(3- chlorophenoxy)propionic acid) is one of phenoxyherbicides widely used in maize, wheat and corn plantations. Controlled release study of cloprop from its nanocomposite was done into various solutions of sodium phosphate concentrations. Four kinetic orders were applied in this study in order to understand the release behavior of cloprop into different aqueous solutions.
2. EXPERIMENTAL
2.1. Preparation of Nanocomposites
All chemicals used in this synthesis were obtained from various chemical suppliers and used without any further purification. All solutions were prepared using deionized water. The preparation of the nanocomposite was carried out using direct co-precipitation method for clopropLDH and direct reaction method for cloprop-ZLH. For cloprop-LDH, a mother liquor containing Zn2+ and Al3+ cations with Zn to Al initial molar ratio R = 3.0 and 0.05 M to 0.3 M cloprop were prepared. The resulting solution was adjusted to pH 7.50 ± 0.02 by drop wise addition of aqueous NaOH (2.0 M). The reaction was carried out under nitrogen atmosphere. The resulting precipitate was aged at 70˚C in an oil bath shaker for 18 hours. The synthesized material was then centrifuged, thoroughly washed with deionized water and dried in an oven at 70˚C. The resulting nanocomposite was then powdered and stored in a sample bottle for further use and characterizations.
Meanwhile cloprop-ZLH was synthesized by mixing 0.05 g of ZnO (pure commercial zinc oxide, reagent ACS, Acros Organics) into 100 ml deionized water. Solutions of cloprop acid with concentrations of 0.05 M to 0.3 M were added into the ZnO solution. The precipitate was aged at 70˚C in an oil bath shaker for 18 hours. The synthesized material was then centrifuged, thoroughly washed with deionized water and dried in an oven at 70˚C. The resulting material was then powdered and stored in a sample bottle for further use and characterizations.
2.2. Instrumentation
Powder X-ray diffraction patterns were recorded at 2˚ - 60˚ on an ITAL 2000 diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation at 40 kV and 30 mA. FTIR spectra of the materials were recorded over the range 400 - 4000 cm−1 on a Perkin-Elmer 1752X Spectrophotometer using KBr disc method. The elemental composition of the samples molar ratio of the resulting nanocomposite were determined by using inductively couple plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES), using a Perkin Elmer Spectrophotometer model Optima 2000DV under standard condition and CHNS analyzer model CHNS-932 (LECO). Thermogravimetric and differential thermogravimetric analyses (TGA/DTG) were carried out using a Mettler Toledo TGA/SDTA851 thermogravimetric analyzer with heating rate of 10˚C∙min−1 between 35˚C - 1000˚C, under nitrogen flow rate of about 50 ml∙min−1.
The release of cloprop from its interlamellae host into the release media, the aqueous solutions at various initial concentrations of sodium phosphate was done by adding about 0.20 g of the nanocomposite into 500 mL of the aqueous solution. The accumulated amount of cloprop released into the solution was measured at preset time at lmax = 217 nm respectively, using a Perkin Elmer UVvisible Spectrophotometer Lambda 35.
3. RESULT AND DISCUSSIONS
3.1. Powder X-Ray Diffraction
Figure 1(a) shows powder XRD patterns of clopropLDH nanocomposite prepared by co-precipitation method at R = 3 (ratio zinc to aluminium) with concentration of cloprop 0.05 M to 0.3 M. As shown in the figure, the intercalation started at cloprop concentration of 0.05 M with a small peak at low angle of 2θ below 10˚ but the peak of unintercalated Zn/Al-LDH remained (peak with basal spacing of 8.9 Å). As the concentration of cloprop is increased from 0.1 M to 0.3 M, the intensity of intercalation peak increased which corresponded with high crystallinity of resulting material when cloprop was introduced. As reported, the mechanism of co-precipitation method relies upon the condensation of hexa-aqua complexes in solution in order to form the brucite-like layers with a distribution of both metallic cations and with solvated interlayer anions [3,13]. As shown in the figure, cloprop intercalated into the layer of LDH shows a pure phase of nanocomposites with sharp and intense peak at low angle of 2θ below 10˚ at 0.2 M cloprop due to high crystallinity of the materials with the basal spacing (003) of 21.0 Å. The expanded basal spacing was attributed to the bigger size and higher density of cloprop intercalated between the interlayer of brucite-type layer compared to nitrate anions.
Figure 1(b) shows of cloprop-ZLH nanocomposite synthesized by direct reaction method at 0.05 M to 0.3 M cloprop. Generally, all PXRD diffraction of clopropZLH showed intercalation peak at low 2θ angle reflection through the dissociation-deposition mechanism [11,14]. All cloprop-ZLH nanocomposite produced sharp and symmetrical peaks, suggesting a well ordered stacking layer. ZnO phase appeared in all of PXRD diffraction which is due to incomplete reaction. As shown in the
Figure 1. PXRD patterns of cloprop-LDH (a) and cloprop-ZLH (b) nanocomposite at different concentration of cloprop anion. Inset is the molecular structure of cloprop.
figure, cloprop-ZLH synthesized with 0.2 M cloprop showed high crystallinity and the least of ZnO phase compared to others with basal spacing of 22.7 Å. For this reason, cloprop-ZLH at 0.2 M has been chosen for further characterization and elemental analysis.
3.2. FTIR
The presence of the intercalated species in the layered hydroxide materials were also supported by FTIR results (Figure 2). FTIR spectra for cloprop showed a broad band at 2959 cm−1 which is attributed to the O-H stretching vibration. A sharp band at 1715 cm−1 is due to the stretching of C = O and bands at 1465 and 1404 cm−1 are attributed to stretching vibrations of aromatic ring C = C. A strong band at 1277 and 1215 cm−1 were due to the symmetric and asymmetric stretching modes of C-O-C of the cloprop anions while a sharp band at 746 cm−1 is due to C-Cl stretching band of both anions [15].
The FTIR spectrum of cloprop-LDH and cloprop-ZLH synthesized using 0.2 M cloprop are also shown in Figure 2. As expected, the spectrum resembles a mixture of both FTIR spectra of cloprop and Zn/Al-LDH, indicating that both functional groups of cloprop and Zn/Al-LDH are present together, except for the peak at 1389 cm−1 and 1713 cm−1 corresponding to the nitrate anions and carboxylic group. The presence of new peaks at around 1577 cm−1 and 1333 cm−1 for cloprop-LDH nanocomposite were due to the C = O carboxylate anion, which confirm the presence of cloprop in the anionic form in the interlayer of the Zn/Al-LDH [16]. This shows the cloprop has higher affinity than nitrate towards the inorganic interlamellae, thus occupies the interlamellae space between the inorganic layers and prevents further cointercalation of nitrate anion.
This is further supported by the CHNS result, which shows the absence of nitrogen in both nanocomposite. FTIR spectrum of cloprop-ZLH nanocomposite (Figure 2) shows the characteristic of the bands of pure cloprop. This indicates the cloprop anions have been intercalated into the interlayer galleries of the ZLH. Some of the bands are slightly shifted in position, presumably due to the interaction between cloprop anions and the host interlayer as a result of the intercalation process.
Intense bands at 1583 and 1399 cm-1 for cloprop-ZLH nanocomposite are attributed to antisymmetric and symmetric carboxylate stretching of the anion. The bands at 1470 and 1409 cm−1 were due to the stretching vibrations of the aromatic ring C = C. A strong band at 869 cm−1 is attributed to C-Cl stretching and the bands at 736 and 772 cm−1 due to C-H vibration of benzene ring in cloprop-ZLH. This indicates the successful intercalation of the guest anion, cloprop.
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of cloprop, cloprop-LDH and clopropZLH nanocomposites.
3.3. Elemental Analysis
Table 1 shows elemental and organic content of cloprop-LDH and cloprop-ZLH. Elemental analysis shows the molar ratio of Zn to Al in clorrop-LDH 2.9 compared to 3.0 for the value initially prepared for the mother liquor. This indicates that the Zn to Al molar ratio in the resulting synthesized materials was adjusted accordingly for the formation of the positively charged inorganic layers to compensate the negatively charged intercalated anion so that the resulting materials cloprop-LDH is neutrally charged [17].
As shown in the table, the estimated percentage of cloprop intercalated into the interlayer are not much different for both nanocomposites which indicated same amount of cloprop anion intercalated between the inter-
Table 1. Elemental composition of cloprop-LDH and clopropZLH nanocomposites.
aestimated using CHNS analysis.
layer of brucite-type layer for cloprop-LDH and cloprop-ZLH nanocomposite. The elemental analysis shows that cloprop-LDH and cloprop-ZLH contained 20.6% and 20.8% carbon (w/w) and loading percentages of cloprop anion in the nanocomposite is 38.3% and 38.8% (w/w), respectively. The results showed that cloprop anion was successfully intercalated between the interlayer of layered materials.
3.4. Thermal Analysis
TGA/DTG thermogravimetric analysis obtained for the choprop-LDH, cloprop-ZLH and cloprop are reported in Figures 3(a)-(c) and Table 2. For cloprop, thermal studies show that the maximum temperature was observed at 204˚C compared to 350˚C and 381˚C to the clopropLDH and cloprop-ZLH nanocomposites. This indicates that cloprop encapsulated into the inorganic interlamellae is thermally more stable than their counterparts in the sodium salt form.
For cloprop-LDH nanocomposite, three stages of weight loss were observed. Meanwhile, cloprop-ZLH showed two stages of weight loss. The first stage is the weight loss due to the physically adsorbed water and interlayer water which could be seen at around 35˚C - 200˚C followed by a weight loss due to the removal of interlayer anion and dehydroxylation of the hydroxyl layer which could be observed at 201˚C - 600˚C. The weight losses for encapsulated organic moiety of the nanocomposite are at 350˚C (cloprop-LDH) and 381˚C (cloprop-ZLH). The third stage was characterized by combustion of the organic species, leaving only a relatively less volatile, metal oxide.
3.5. Controlled Release Study
Controlled release of cloprop anion from cloprop-LDH, cloprop-ZLH nanocomposite into sodium phosphate had been done at different concentrations of sodium phosphate which is shown in Figures 4(a) and (b).
Based on the components of rain water, phosphate solution was chosen as the medium for release of cloprop phenoxyherbicides. Since the research was carried out in the laboratory, the results collected will give us the information and patterns of releasing cloprop phenoxyherbicides from the interlayer of nanocomposite, some adjustments or modifications of the involved method need
Figure 3. TGA/DTG thermograms of cloprop (a), cloprop-LDH (b) and cloprop-ZLH (c) nanocomposites.
to be done to improve the material before it can be used in plantation. A series of accumulated released profile of cloprop anion from the interlamellae of the nanocomposite into the sodium phosphate aqueous solutions are done at various initial concentrations of 0.002 M, 0.005 M and 0.008 M.
As shown in the figure, a rapid release was found in all solutions at the beginning of time, followed by a more sustained release. The release profile of cloprop from cloprop-LDH and cloprop-ZLH nanocomposite shows an increasing value of accumulated release percentage as the concentration of the release solution was increased. This observation can be due to the many sacrificial anions which act as driving force for the release of cloprop anion from nanocomposite interlayer to aqueous solution. These sacrificial anions have high affinity towards the interlayer nanocomposite compared to the existing counter anion, resulting in ion exchange taking place [12]. At higher concentration of the anions in the aqueous media, more ion exchange process is obtained and a faster rate can be observed. The maximum accumulated release of cloprop (0.008 M) into the medium can be achieved at around 600 and 200 min, respectively for both cloprop from cloprop-LDH, cloprop-ZLH nanocomposite with the percentage of 86% and 91%. A fast release of cloprop anion from its nanocomposite could be due to high density of phosphate anion leading to a high formation of electrostatic interaction between phosphate anion with the positive charged layer of layered hydroxide material in the ion exchange process.
The release profile showed the accumulated release of cloprop from cloprop-LDH is slightly lower than cloprop-ZLH nanocomposite. The differences of the release profile were due to the crystallinity of the synthesized nanocomposite which refers to PXRD pattern for cloprop-ZLH nanocomposite. It shows high crystallinity than cloprop-LDH with the basal spacing of 22.7 Å and 21.0 Å, respectively. High crystallinity material resulted of well-ordered arrangement of anion in the host during the intercalation process. Release of the intercalated guest from nanocomposite with high crystallinity and larger particle size would be slower than the ones with lower crystallinity and smaller particle size. This is due to the stability of the anion arrangement as well the less surface accessibility of the nanocomposite material to be ion exchanged with the incoming anion from medium. This explains the slightly different release rates between the cloprop-ZLH and cloprop-LDH. The method of preparation plays an important role in determining the physico-chemical properties of the resulting nanocomposites, in particular their surface properties and release behaviour of the guest anions [12].
3.6. Kinetic Study
Release kinetic studies of cloprop from its nanocomposites into sodium phosphate solutions were analyzed by applying four different kinetic models in order to study the behaviour of the release process.
It was suggested that the release of guest anion from the nanocomposite could be best described either by dissolution of LDH [18,19] or by diffusion through the LDH [20,21]. The methods used are zeroth order (Equation (1)) [22], first order (Equation (2)) [23], pseudosecond order (Equation (3)) [24] and parabolic diffusion (Equation (4)) [21], for which the equations are given below. The x is the percentage release of herbicides anion at time t, Mi and Mf are the initial and final concentrations of herbicides anions, respectively and C is a constant. The parameter correlation coefficients, r2 rate
Table 2. TGA-DTG results for cloprop-LDH, cloprop-ZLH and cloprop anion.
Figure 4. Release profile of clorop from the interlamellae of the clopropLDH (a) and cloprop-ZLH (b) nanocomposite into aqueous solutions containing various concentrations of Na3PO4.
constants, k and t1/2 values (the time required for 50% of cloprop to be released from nanocomposites) are calculated from the corresponding equations.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
The extent of time determined to gauge the values of cloprop release fitted into the equation was fixed at 0 to1000 minutes.
Based on the four kinetic models above, the fitting results of cloprop release profiles are given in Figures 5 and 6 and Table 3. It can be seen in Figure 5 that the best fit is the plot of t/Mi against time which shows an agreement with pseudo-second order kinetic model for cloprop-LDH in all sodium phosphate solution as the evidence of linearization of other models such as zeroth order, first order and parabolic diffusion do not fit nicely to the experimental data. On the other hand, the release of cloprop from cloprop-ZLH into aqueous solution containing phosphate anion showed a good fitting with parabolic diffusion model as evident by high r2 values compared to first, zeroth and pseudo-second order (Figure 6).
Generally, the parabolic diffusion model elucidates that the release process is controlled by intra particle diffusion or surface diffusion. Therefore, it could be suggested that the results indicate the external surface diffusion or the intra particle diffusion via ion exchange which is the rate-determining step in the release process [25]. These results indicate that LDH and ZLH can be used to host a model guest, cloprop for their with controlled release properties.
For all the nanocomposites, the t1/2 values that is the time taken for the herbicides anion concentration to increase to one-half of its initial values decrease as the concentration of the sodium phosphate increases. This is
Figure 5. Fitting of the data of cloprop released into aqueous solutions containing various concentrations of Na3PO4; 0.002 M (circles), 0.005 M (squares) and 0.008 M (triangles) to the zeroth (a), first (b) and pseudo-second order (c) kinetics, and parabolic diffusion (d) for cloprop-LDH (t = 0 - 1000 min).
Figure 6. Fitting of the data of cloprop released into aqueous solutions containing various concentrations of Na3PO4; 0.002 M (circles), 0.005 M (squares) and 0.008 M (triangles) to the zeroth (a), first (b) and pseudo-second order (c) kinetics, and parabolic diffusion (d) for cloprop-ZLH (t = 0 - 1000 min).
Table 3. Rate constants, half life (t1/2) and correlation coefficients obtained from the fitting of the data of cloprop release from cloprop-LDH and cloprop-ZLH into Na3PO4 solutions.
Unit: k(mg−1Ls−1), t1/2(min).
obviously because as the concentration of the phosphate increases, more phosphate anions are available to be ion exchanged with cloprop anion, resulting in lower values of t1/2. This pattern is similar to the t1/2 values for the release of acetochlor from clay/CMC gel formulations [26]. The results demonstrate the zinc layered hydroxide and layered double hydroxide material are effective inorganic matrix for the herbicides anions storage and possesses controlled delivery at the required time, which is recommendable for the agricultural purposes.
4. CONCLUSION
The intercalation of cloprop phenoxyherbicides anion into Zn/Al-layered double hydroxide and zinc-layered hydroxide using co-precipitation and direct reaction method, respectively, was synthesized. This was proven through the expansion of d spacing in PXRD pattern with value of 21.0 Å (cloprop-LDH) and 22.7 Å (clopropZLH). Percentage release of chlorprop from interlayer of cloprop-ZLH nanocomposite was slightly higher than that from cloprop-LDH nanocomposite in controlled release study due to the high crystallinity of cloprop-ZLH. The release behavior of cloprop from its nanocomposites into phosphate solution followed the pseudo-second-order for cloprop-LDH and parabolic diffusion for clopropZLH. The present study shows that both layered hydroxide materials are compatible inorganic matrix proposed for controlled release formulation of herbicides in agriculture.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The support of the research by KPM under RACE Grant no. 2012- 0151-101-62. NH thanks UPSI for all affords and support in this research.
NOTES