Nature of Conflicts, Tensions and Exploitation in Sharecropping in Rural Sindh

Ghulam Hussain, Anwaar Mohyuddin, Shuja Ahmed

Department of Anthropology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Pakistan Study Centre, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan.

DOI: 10.4236/ojapps.2013.38058                

Abstract

This paper explains the causes of conflicts and tensions in sharecropping relationships, the nature and level of exploitation. It explains the immediate as well as root causes of conflicts that emerge between sharecroppers and landlords. Life-world of peasants of Sindh has been explored at village, sub-regional and regional level. It was found that the historical systemic structures of exploitation still exist in its refined form in peasant life-world. Peasant life within village and among village peasants is relatively peaceful. Conflicts emerge or take serious turn when outside systemic agents get involved in issues related to sharecropper and landlord. Historically property rights given to big landlords and feudal lords by imperialistic forces while snatching the indigenous right of peasants to self-cultivation, is the root cause that has spawned several sub-systemic pathologies in the life-world of peasants. Absentee landlordism, Kamdaari system, debt bondage, social bondage, system of Kann, landlessness, adulterated hybrid seeds, and issues of Sanad are some of the sub-systemic evils that have emerged over the years. All such sub-systemic structures put bigger and influential landlords into strategic advantage over the sharecroppers, particularly landless peasants; the imbalance that perpetuates “permanent liminality” suppresses reciprocal dialogues and discourages mutual negotiations. Outside systemic factors like SHO-Landlord nexus or Feudal-Police-Tapedar troika play central role in conflict creation and exacerbation in landlord-sharecropper relationship leading to bloody conflicts, caste wars, tribal feuds and honor-killings, thus, further differentiating and alienating life-world and the system rural Sindh.

Keywords

Life-World; Rationality; Conflict; Sharecroppers; Exploitation; Liminality

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	G. Ritzer, “Sociological Theory,” 8th Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2011.
[2]	B. Thomassen, “The Uses and Meanings of Liminality,” International Political Anthropology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2009, pp. 5-28.
[3]	R. Bolton, “Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action and the Theory of Social Capital. Regional Science Association,” San Diego, 2005, p. 39.
[4]	J. Habermas, “Reason and the Rationalization of Society,” Vol. 1, Beacon Press, Boston, 1984.
[5]	A. Szakolczai, “Liminality and Experience: Structuring Transitory Situations and Transformative Events,” International Political Anthropology, 2009.
[6]	A. Horvath, B. Thomassen and H. Wydra, “Introduction: Liminality and Cultures of Change,” International Political Anthropology, 2009.
[7]	A. Mohyuddin, H. R. Chaudhry and M. Ambreen, “Economic Structure of a Village in Balochistan: World System Analysis at Micro Level in Anthropological Perspective,” International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Research, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2012, pp. 79-98.
[8]	A. Mohyuddin, H. R. Chaudhry and M. Ambreen, “Economic Empowerment of Women in the Rural Areas of Balochistan,” Pakistan Journal of Women’s Studies: Alam-e-Niswan, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2012, pp. 239-257.
[9]	G. Haris, K. Ayesha and K. Themrise, “Land Tenure, Rural Livelihoods and Institutional Innovation,” 2002.
[10]	Bhandaar Sangat, “Porihiat: Chambar Hari Tehreek,” Special Edition, Hyderabad, 2012.
[11]	Bhandaar Sangat, “Reports,” 2013. http://www.bhs.org.pk/home
[12]	PILER, “Labor Rights in Pakistan: Declining Decent Work and Emerging Struggles,” Pakistan Institute of Labor Education and Research, 2010.
[13]	G. Ritzer, “Sociological Theory,” 4 Edition, McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1996.
[14]	J. Habermas, “Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason,” Vol. 2, Beacon Press, Boston, 1987.
[15]	M. Khadarposh, “Jinen Daand Na Bijj (Hari Report),” Naqoosh Press, Urdu Bazaar Lahore, 2002.
[16]	Bhandaar Sangat, “Case Studies,” 2013. http://www.bhs.org.pk/casestudies/
[17]	B. H. Sangat and G. B. Oxfam, “People’s Declaration of Agrarian Reforms,” Pamphlet. Hyderabad, Sindh, Pakistan: Bhandar Hari Sangat, 2012.
[18]	A. Escobar, “Alternatives to Development’: An Interview with Arturo Escobar,” Venice, 2012.
[19]	L. V. Campeina, “Declaration of Rights of Peasants-Women and Men,” Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia: J. I. Mampang Prapatan XIV No. 5.
[20]	P. McMichael, “Peasants Make Their Own History, but Not Just as They Please...,” Journal of Agrarian Change, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2008, pp. 205-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2008.00168.x