Threshold Effects in the Foreign Aid-Economic Growth Relationship: The Role of Institutional Quality and Macroeconomic Policy Environment

Daniel Komlan Fiodendji, Kodjo Evlo

.
Departement of Economics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

DOI: 10.4236/me.2013.411074                

Abstract

Since the influential paper of [1], the issue relating to the conditions in recipient countries has become central in the foreign aid debate. Scholars and policymakers alike are interested in identifying the conditions which make foreign aid more effective. To contribute to this growing debate, this paper investigates the role of macroeconomic policy environment, institutional policy and a combination of these two previous variables in aid-growth relationship. The empirical analysis is based on a panel data set including 13 ECOWAS¹ countries during the period from 1984 to 2010. Using a modified panel threshold model, the evidence strongly supports the view that the relationship between aid and economic growth is nonlinear with a unique threshold. The paper finds that a stable macroeconomic environment and better institutional quality are sine qua non for the effective contribution of aid to sustainable growth in ECOWAS countries. Furthermore, we find that institutional quality is an important determinant condition which allows aid affects economic growth. One of main contributions of this paper is to successfully identify the conditions under which the aid has a positive impact on economic growth. It is desirable to keep the combination condition in States II and IV (the macroeconomic policy environment is below or above and institutional quality above their threshold respectively) because it may be helpful for the achievement of sustainable economic growth. The results seem to indicate that bad institutional quality may have detrimental effects on economic growth. This will be an important result for the policymakers and international financial institutions, which increasingly favour conditionality and selectivity in the allocation of aid resources. The major policy implication of our results is not a call for a reduction of foreign aid but rather a call for rethinking strategies for international assistance and redesigning existing aid programs.

Keywords

Foreign Aid; Economic Growth; Threshold Effects; Institutional Quality; Economic Policy

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	C. Burnside and D. Dollar, “Aid, Policies, and Growth: Revisiting the Evidence,” Policy Research Working Paper No. 3251, The World Bank, Washington DC, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3251
[2]	P. Mosley, J. Hudson and S. Horrell, “Aid, the Public Sector and the Market in Less Developed Countries,” Economic Journal, Vol. 97, No. 387, 1987, pp. 616-641. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2232927
[3]	P. Boone, “Politics and the Effectiveness of Foreign Aid,” European Economic Review, Vol. 40, No. 2, 1996, pp. 289-329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(95)00127-1
[4]	H. Hansen and F. Tarp, “Aid and Growth Regressions,” Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 64, No. 2, 2001, pp. 547-570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(00)00150-4
[5]	G. F. Papanek, “The Effect of Aid and Other Resource Transfers on Savings and Growth in Less Developed Countries,” Economic Journal, Vol. 82, No. 327, 1972, pp. 934-950. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2230259
[6]	M. Islam, “Regime Changes, Economic Policies and the Effect of Aid on Growth,” Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 41, No. 8, 2005, pp. 1467-1492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220380500187828
[7]	C. Dalgaard, H. Hansen and F. Tarp, “On the Empirics of Foreign Aid a01Vol. 32, No. 3, 1993, pp. 485-511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(93)90027-D
[8]	A. Levin, C. F. Lin and C. Chu, “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 108, No. 1, 2002, pp. 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7
[9]	J. Breitung, “The Local Power of Some Unit Root Tests for Panel Data,” Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 15, 2001, pp. 161-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15006-6
[10]	K. S. Im, M. H. Pesaran and Y. Shin, “Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 115, No. 1, 2003. pp. 53-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
[11]	G. S. Maddala and S. Wu, “A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Special Issue, 1999, pp. 631-652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.61.s1.13
[12]	I. Choi, “Unit Root Tests for Panel Data,” Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2001, pp. 249-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5606(00)00048-6
[13]	T. Omay and E. O. Kan, “Re-Examining the Threshold Effects in the Inflation-Growth Nexus with Cross-Sectionally Dependent Non-Linear Panel: Evidence from Six Industrialized Economies,” Economic Modelling, Vol. 27, No. 5, 2010, pp. 998-1005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2010.04.011
[14]	L. Gong and H.-F. Zou, “Foreign Aid Reduces Labour Supply and Capital Accumulation,” Review of Development Economics, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2001, pp. 105-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9361.00110
[15]	P. Boone, “The Impact of Foreign Aid on Savings and Growth,” Centre for Economic Performance, Working Paper No. 677, 1994.
[16]	R. Rajan and A. Subramanian, “Aid and Growth, What Does the Cross Country Evidence Really Show?” IMF Working Paper No. 05/127, 2005.
[17]	R. J. Barro, “Economic Growth in A Cross-Section of Countries,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 106, No. 2, 1991, pp. 407-443. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2937943
[18]	R. J. Barro and X. Salai-Martin, “Economic Growth,” 2nd Edition, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2004.
[19]	R. J. Barro and X. Salai-Martin, “Convergence,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 100, No. 2, 1992, pp. 223-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261816
[20]	C. Burnside and D. Dollar, “Aid, Policies and Growth,” American Economic Review, Vol. 90, No. 4, 2000, pp. 847-868. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.4.847
[21]	W. Easterly, R. Levine and D. Roodman, “Aid, Policies, and Growth: Comment,” American Economic Review, Vol. 94, No. 3, 2004, pp. 774-780. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/0002828041464560
[22]	W. Easterly, R. Levine and D. Roodman, “New Data, New Doubts: A Comment on Burnside and Dollar’s ‘Aid, Policies, and Growth’ (2000),” American Economic Review, Vol. 94, No. 3, 2003, pp. 774-780.
[23]	R. G. Murphy and N. G. Tresp, “Government Policy and the Effectiveness of Foreign Aid,” Department of Economics, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, 2006.
[24]	E. Alvi, D. Mukherjee and E. K. Shukralla, “Foreign Aid, Growth, Policy and Reform,” Economics Bulletin, Vol. 15, No. 6, 2006, pp. 1-9.
[25]	D. Moyo, “Dead Aid: Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is a Better Way for Africa,” Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 2009.
[26]	Y. M. Batana, “Aid and Poverty in Africa: Do Well-Being Measures Understate the Progress?” African Development Review, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2010, pp. 452-469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8268.2010.00256.x