Activating interactions of sulfanilamides with T cell receptors

Stephan Watkins, Werner J. Pichler

Department of Graduate Cell Biology and Biomedical Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergology, Inselspital/University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

DOI: 10.4236/oji.2013.33019                

Abstract

Activation and expansion of drug reactive T cells are key features in drug hypersensitivity reactions. Drugs may interact directly with immune receptors such as the human leukocyte antigens (HLA) or the T-cell receptors (TCR) itself, the pharmacological interaction [p-i] concept. To analyze whether the drug sulfamethoxazole (SMX) interacts directly with the TCR and thereby contributing to signaling and T cell activation, we analyze two SMX specific T cell clones (TCC “1.3”and “H13”). Proliferation to SMX and 11 related sulfanilamides, Ca++ influx in drug stimulated T-cells and the inhibitory effect of non-reactive sulfanilamides on SMX stimulation were analyzed. In silico docking of SMX and related sulfanilamide to the TCR were used to identify possible drug binding sites, and correlated to in vitro data to find the correct docking. In Ca++ influx assays, reactions occurred as early as 14 sec after adding SMX to TCC and APC. The broadly reactive clone (“H13”) was stimulated by 5 additional sulfanilamide, while one TCC (“1.3”) was reactive exclusively with SMX but not other sulfanilamides. Competition experiments with sulfanilamide inhibited SMX induced Ca++ influx and proliferation of the TCC1.3 ina dose dependent way. Docking experiments with SMX and related sulfanilamides confirmed and explained the in vitro data as docking localized binding sites for SMX and the 5 stimulating sulfanilamides on the CDR2β domain of the clone H13, while the 6 non-stimulatory SA failed to bind. In TCC 1.3, SMX could be docked on the CDR3α of the TCR. The other, non-stimulatory but inhibitory SA could also be docked to the same site. The combined analysis of in vitro and in silico data show that sulfanilamide can bind directly to TCRs. It shows that TCR, like other receptors, appear to be reamenable to manipulations by small molecules.

Keywords

p-i Concept; Drug Hypersensitivity; Sulfamethoxazole; TCR Signaling; TCR Specificity; TCR-Modelling; T Cell Clones

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Pichler, W.J. (2003) Delayed drug hypersensitivity reactions. Annals of Internal Medicine, 139, 683-693. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-139-8-200310210-00012
[2]	Castrejon, J.L., et al. (2010) Stimulation of human T cells with sulfonamides and sulfonamide metabolites. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 125, 411-418.
[3]	Mauri-Hellweg, D., et al. (1995) Activation of drug-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in individuals allergic to sulfonamides, phenytoin, and carbamazepine. Journal of Immunology, 155, 462-472.
[4]	von Greyerz, S., et al. (1999) Interaction of sulfonamide derivatives with the TCR of sulfamethoxazole-specific human alpha beta+ T cell clones. Journal of Immunology, 162, 595-602.
[5]	Schnyder, B., et al. (1997) Direct, MHC-dependent presentation of the drug sulfamethoxazole to human alphabeta T cell clones. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 100, 136-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI119505
[6]	Pichler, W.J. (2002) Pharmacological interaction of drugs with antigen-specific immune receptors: The p-i concept. Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2, 301-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00130832-200208000-00003
[7]	Pichler, W.J., et al. (2006) Pharmacological interaction of drugs with immune receptors: The p-i concept. Allergology International, 55, 17-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.2332/allergolint.55.17
[8]	Alarcon, B., Mestre, D. and Martinez-Martin, N. (2011) The immunological synapse: A cause or consequence of T-cell receptor triggering? Immunology, 133, 420-425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2567.2011.03458.x
[9]	Kummerow, C., et al. (2009) The immunological synapse controls local and global calcium signals in T lymphocytes. Immunological Reviews, 231, 132-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-065X.2009.00811.x
[10]	Oltz, E.M. (2001) Regulation of antigen receptor gene assembly in lymphocytes. Immunologic Research, 23, 121- 133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1385/IR:23:2-3:121
[11]	de Bakker, P.I., et al. (2006) A high-resolution HLA and SNP haplotype map for disease association studies in the extended human MHC. Nature Genetics, 38, 1166-1172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng1885
[12]	Adam, J., Pichler, W.J. and Yerly, D. (2011) Delayed drug hypersensitivity: Models of T-cell stimulation. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 71, 701-707. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03764.x
[13]	Adam, J., et al. (2012) Avidity determines T-cell reactivity in abacavir hypersensitivity. European Journal of Immunology, 42, 1706-1716. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eji.201142159
[14]	Pavlos, R., Mallal, S. and Phillips, E. (2012) HLA and pharmacogenetics of drug hypersensitivity. Pharmacogenomics, 13, 1285-1306. http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/pgs.12.108
[15]	Wei, C.Y., et al. (2012) Direct interaction between HLAB and carbamazepine activates T cells in patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 129, 1562-1569.
[16]	Yang, C.W., et al. (2007) HLA-B*1502-bound peptides: implications for the pathogenesis of carbamazepine-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 120, 870-877. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2007.06.017
[17]	Illing, P.T., et al. (2012) Immune self-reactivity triggered by drug-modified HLA-peptide repertoire. Nature, 486, 554-558.
[18]	Ostrov, D.A., et al. (2012) Drug hypersensitivity caused by alteration of the MHC-presented self-peptide repertoire. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, 109, 9959-9964. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1207934109
[19]	Norcross, M.A., et al. (2012) Abacavir induces loading of novel self-peptides into HLA-B*57: 01: An autoimmune model for HLA-associated drug hypersensitivity. AIDS, 26, F21-F29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0b013e328355fe8f
[20]	Dickhaut, K., et al. (2009) Enhancement of tumour-specific immune responses in vivo by 'MHC loading-enhancer' (MLE). PLoS One, 4, e6811. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006811
[21]	von Greyerz, S., et al. (2001) Degeneracy and additional alloreactivity of drug-specific human alpha beta(+) T cell clones. International Immunology, 13, 877-885. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intimm/13.7.877
[22]	Zanni, M.P., et al. (1998) Allele-unrestricted presentation of lidocaine by HLA-DR molecules to specific alphabeta+ T cell clones. International Immunology, 10, 507- 515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intimm/10.4.507
[23]	Schmid, D.A., et al. (2006) Transfection of drug-specific T-cell receptors into hybridoma cells: tools to monitor drug interaction with T-cell receptors and evaluate cross- reactivity to related compounds. Molecular Pharmacology, 70, 356-365.
[24]	Burkhart, C., et al. (2002) Non-covalent presentation of sulfamethoxazole to human CD4+ T cells is independent of distinct human leucocyte antigen-bound peptides. Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 32, 1635-1643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2222.2002.01513.x
[25]	Zanni, M.P., et al. (1998) HLA-restricted, processing-and metabolism-independent pathway of drug recognition by human alpha beta T lymphocytes. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 102, 1591-1598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI3544
[26]	Yin, Y., Wang, X.X. and Mariuzza, R.A. (2012) Crystal structure of a complete ternary complex of T-cell receptor, peptide-MHC, and CD4. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, 109, 5405-5410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118801109
[27]	Arechaga, I., et al. (2010) Structural characterization of the TCR complex by electron microscopy. International Immunology, 22, 897-903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intimm/dxq443
[28]	Vega-Hissi, E.G., et al. (2011) Theoretical studies on sulfanilamide and derivatives with antibacterial activity: conformational and electronic analysis. Journal of Molecular Modeling, 17, 1317-1323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00894-010-0829-y
[29]	Halim M.A., D.M. Shaw and Poirier R.A. (2010) Medium effect on the equilibrium geometries, vibrational frequencies and solvation energies of sulfanilamide. Journal of Molecular Structure: THEOCHEM, 960, 63-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theochem.2010.08.027
[30]	Depta, J.P., et al. (2004) Drug interaction with T-cell receptors: T-cell receptor density determines degree of cross- reactivity. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 113, 519-527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2003.11.030
[31]	Burrows, S.R., et al. (2010) Hard wiring of T cell receptor specificity for the major histocompatibility complex is underpinned by TCR adaptability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, 107, 10608-10613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004926107
[32]	Newell, E.W., et al. (2011) Structural basis of specificity and cross-reactivity in T cell receptors specific for cytochrome c-I-E(k). Journal of Immunology, 186, 5823-5832. http://dx.doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1100197
[33]	Thomson, C.T., et al. (2001) A structural difference limited to one residue of the antigenic peptide can profoundly alter the biological outcome of the TCR-peptide/MHC class I interaction. Journal of Immunology, 166, 3994- 3997.
[34]	Reantragoon, R., et al. (2012) Structural insight into MR1-mediated recognition of the mucosal associated invariant T cell receptor. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 209, 761-774. http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20112095
[35]	Baker, B.M., et al. (2012) Structural and dynamic control of T-cell receptor specificity, cross-reactivity, and binding mechanism. Immunological Reviews, 250, 10-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01165.x
[36]	Ko, T.M., et al. (2011) Shared and restricted T-cell receptor use is crucial for carbamazepine-induced Stevens- Johnson syndrome. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 128, 1266-1276. e11.
[37]	Naisbitt, D.J., et al. (2001) Antigenicity and immunogenicity of sulphamethoxazole: Demonstration of metabolism-dependent haptenation and T-cell proliferation in vivo. British Journal of Pharmacology, 133, 295-305. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0704074
[38]	Theorell, J., et al. (2011) Sensitive and viable quantification of inside-out signals for LFA-1 activation in human cytotoxic lymphocytes by flow cytometry. Journal of Immunological Methods, 366, 106-118. doi:10.1016/j.jim.2011.01.014
[39]	Arnold, K., et al. (2006) The SWISS-MODEL workspace: A web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics, 22, 195-201. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti770
[40]	Kleywegt, G.J. and Jones, T.A. (1996) Efficient rebuilding of protein structures. Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography, 52, 829-832. doi:10.1107/S0907444996001783
[41]	Van Der Spoel, D., et al. (2005) GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 26, 1701-1718. doi:10.1002/jcc.20291
[42]	Morris, G.M., Huey, R. and Olson, A.J. (2008) Using AutoDock for ligand-receptor docking. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, 8, p. Unit 8. 14.
[43]	Trott, O. and Olson, A.J. (2010) AutoDock vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 31, 455-461.
[44]	Plewczynski, D., et al. (2011) VoteDock: Consensus docking method for prediction of protein-ligand interactions. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 32, 568-581. doi:10.1002/jcc.21642
[45]	Seeliger, D. and de Groot, B.L. (2010) Ligand docking and binding site analysis with PyMOL and Autodock/vina. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 24, 417-422. doi:10.1007/s10822-010-9352-6