Culturability and Viability of Salmonella Typhimurium during Photo-Fenton Process at pH 5.5 under Solar Simulated Irradiation

Abstract

Culturability and viability techniques such as plate count on solid agar (PC), Most Probable Number (MPN) and Direct Viable Count-Fluorescence in Situ Hybridation (DVC FISH) were used to study the inactivation of Salmonella typhimurium by photo-Fenton process at pH 5.5. In the presence of only simulated solar irradiation (500 W·m-2), S. typhimurim showed that both culturability measured by MPN and viability (measured by DVC FISH) underwent just a slight decreasing of 2 and 1 log respectively after 240 min of light exposition while culturability measured by PC did not show any change. Results after 48 h of dark conditions did not reveal re-growth. However, when experiment was carried out in the presence of 2 mg L-1 of Fe3+ and 20 mg L-1 of H2O2 and pH 5.5, culturability was strongly affected after 240 min of simulated solar irradiation; nevertheless, viability was only slightly altered (~1 log). During dark period of 48 h changes on culturability and viability were not observed. On the other hand, it was also found that sugar metabolism was affected rather the amino-acids in S. typhimurium cells irradiated at different times upon photo-Fenton conditions. These findings might suggest for the first time that photo-Fenton process at pH 5.5 could induce viable but nonculturable state (VBNC) on waterborne S. typhimurium and that probably sugar metabolism damage could activate the VBNC state.

Share and Cite:

J. Rengifo-Herrera, O. Castaño and I. Sanabria, "Culturability and Viability of Salmonella Typhimurium during Photo-Fenton Process at pH 5.5 under Solar Simulated Irradiation," Journal of Water Resource and Protection, Vol. 5 No. 8A, 2013, pp. 21-27. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2013.58A003.

1. Introduction

Photo-Fenton processes which are based in the light induced reaction of ferrous and/or ferric ions with hydrogen peroxide to generate reactive oxygen species such as protonated superoxide (HO2•) and •OH radical, have recently risen as a promising method to inactivate waterborne bacteria [1-5].

Recent studies reported that solar photo-Fenton process at near neutral pH (5.5) achieved a complete inactivation of wild Salmonella sp., a pathogen bacterial strain resistant to solar disinfection [6], without re-growth after 72 h of dark storage by simple addition of H2O2 in natural waters containing iron at neutral pH [7]. Furthermore at pH 5.5 it was demonstrated that ferric ions undergo a strong interaction with E. coli cells avoiding its precipitation and inactivating efficiently the bacteria cells [4]. However all disinfection studies performed with photoFenton processes either at acid or near neutral pH have been carried out using plate count methods on solid agar to quantify the microorganisms [2,4,5,7,8]; this procedure could give a false positive since it takes only into account the cell culturability neglecting its viability. Several studies have suggested that when bacteria undergo oxidative stress by the presence of UV light or toxic substances such as radicals, they could enter in the transient viable but nonculturable state (VBNC), produced by oxidative stress; VBNC state is a condition where microorganisms lose its capacity to grow in nutritive media [9,10]. Nevertheless, when the oxidative stress ceases, microbial cells can undergo resuscitation where they recover their culturability under specific conditions [10]. This later fact is a key point since some authors have suggested Salmonella typhimurium cells could maintain their virulence during VBNC state, and this could imply a serious threat to human health in disinfection processes [11-13].

There are methodologies that can determinate the cell viability. Among them the coupling of Direct Viable count (DVC) with Fluorescence in situ Hybridation (FISH) seems to be effective to determinate viability of waterborne bacterial cells [14]. Moreover the coupling of DVC with FISH has successfully been used to determinate viability in Escherichia coli cells from natural waters and seems to be a powerful technique to evaluate the viability of waterborne enteric bacteria [15,16].

Herein, for the first time, culturability and viability were measured simultaneously by PC, MPN and DVCFISH of S. typhimurim being exposed to the photo-Fenton processes induced by simulated solar light irradiation at pH 5.5. It is suggested that this photochemical process could induce on the bacterial cells VBNC state avoiding their growing on solid agar and liquid media after 240 min of simulated solar irradiation. This fact is extremely important since it might allow evaluate precisely the ability and limitations of photo-Fenton process to inactive pathogen waterborne bacteria.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Photochemical and Photo-Fenton Experiments at pH 5.5

Pyrex glass bottles of 80 mL (3.5 cm in diameter and 10 cm high) were used as batch reactors. 2 mg L−1 of Fe3+ (FeSO4·7H2O (Merck-Germany)) and 20 mg L1 of H2O2 (Merck-Germany 30% (v/v)) were added to 80 mL of an isotonic solution containing distilled water and NaCl (Sigma-Aldrich Germany) (8.0 g L1), KCl (Merck Germany) (0.8 g L1) in each reactor. The initial pH was adjusted by NaOH (Merck Germany) addition until reaching 5.5, not buffer was used. Solar irradiation was simulated by a Hanau Suntest solar simulator (Germany) having a wavelength spectral distribution with about 0.5% of emitted photons <300 nm (UV-C range) and about 7% between 300 and 400 nm (UV-B, A range). The emission spectrum between 400 and 800 nm follows the solar spectrum (Figure 1). Light intensity in all experiments was 500 W∙m2 and it was monitored with a Kipp & Zonen (CM3) power meter (Omni instruments,

Figure 1. Emission spectrum of solar simulator Hannau Suntest.

Dundee, UK). Pyrex bottles containing inoculated S. ty-phimurium were illuminated in the presence and absence of Fe3+ and H2O2 during 4 h and samples (1.0 mL) were taken at different time intervals and serial dilutions were performed in saline solution.

The irradiation experiments were performed at room temperature (25˚C) and the temperature of the solution increased up to approximately 30˚C during irradiation. All experiments were carried out in equilibrium agitating at 700 rpm in triplicate and the error bars were added on the graphs.

2.2. Preparation of Salmonella Typhimurium Strain

A strain of S. typhimurium ATCC 15490 (Washington DC, USA) was used during these experiments. Strain was preserved in a 30% glycerol solution to avoid membrane rupture during freezing storage. The bacterial reactivation was achieved by inoculating 10 mL of nutrient broth (Oxoid) with 100 µL of bacterial suspension, and then incubating for 18 h at 35˚C. A second inoculum was transferred from this culture to a new tube with 10 mL of nutrient broth and again incubated for 18 h at 35˚C. This second culture was washed by centrifuging at 3000 rpm for 10 min; the supernatant was carefully extracted so the pellet can be suspended and diluted in 10 mL of 0.1% peptonized bi-distillated water (Milli-Q water), agitated and centrifuged again. This procedure was repeated three times, leaving the last cell pellet suspended in 10 mL of 0.1% peptonized bi-distillated water. The final concentration of the washed cell suspension was adjusted according to the McFarland scale #0.5 at 1.5 × 108 CFU mL1. Consecutive dilutions (101 - 104) of the adjusted cell suspension (1.5 × 108 CFU mL1) were made in tubes with 9 mL of 0.1% peptonized water (Oxoid), and seeded onto nutrient agar to be incubated for 18 h at 35˚C to establish the initial concentration. This cell suspension was used to inoculate the batch reactors containing the isotonic saline distillated water with Fe3+ (FeSO4·7H2O (Merck-Germany)), and H2O2 (Merck-Germany), to initiate irradiation experiments.

2.3. Culturability Measurement of Salmonella Typhimurium by MPN and PC

2.3.1. PC Method

100 μL from each dilution were seeded onto Petri dishes containing Nutrient Agar (Merck-Germany) and incubated at 37˚C ± 2˚C for 24 h to obtain the CFU measuring.

2.3.2. MPN Method

1 mL from each dilution were inoculated onto tubes with 9 mL of lactose broth (Difco) and incubated at 35˚C ± 2˚C for 24 h in order to initiate the presumptive phase. The positives for bacterial growth were then recovered in Rappaport broth (Merck-Germany) before being seeded on Hektoen (Merck-Germany), Xylose, Lysine Desoxycholate agar (XLD agar) (Difco-France) and Nutrient agar (Merck-Germany) to finalize with the confirmatory phase.

2.4. Viability Measurement of Salmonella Typhimurium by DVC FISH

The FISH-DAPI coloration procedure suggested by Amman et al. [17] was used for the total cell enumeration, while viable cells were enumerated using the DVCFISH method proposed by Kogure et al. [18] and Regnault et al. [19] with the following modifications.

2.4.1. DVC-FISH

The remaining 8.8 mL sample in each dilution tube were treated with Nalidixic acid (40 μg mL1) and 1 mL of lactose broth (Difco-France) and yeast extract (DifcoFrance), then incubated in the dark for 18 h at 35 ± 2˚C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5000 g. Depending on the expected concentration, 100 or 300 μL were re-suspended in 10 x phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution to reach 1 mL and fixated with a paraformaldehyde fixation buffer 30% (v/v), stored overnight at 4˚C, and harvested by centrifugation at 1000 g for 10 min. The pellets were washed with PBS solution. This washing process was repeated two times to ensure the complete removal of p-formaldehyde, and the final pellets were re-suspended in 500 μL of 1 × PBS and 500 μL of ethanol 100%. 10 μL of the resulting cell suspension was transferred to each well of a 8-well slide, previously covered with gelatine (0.1% w/v) and KCr(SO4)2 (MerckGermany) (0.01% w/v). The loaded slides were dehydrated with ethanol and incubated for 2 h in the dark with 10 μL of hybridization solution pre-warmed at 45˚C and containing 24 ng∙μL1of S. typhimurium probe [16,20], marked with 5’ Cy3 (prepared by Microsynth GmbH Switzerland). Finally, cells were washed with a washing solution at 45˚C and then rinsed with distilled water.

2.4.2. DAPI

After hybridization, all samples were washed in distilled water and stained with 9 μL of DAPI (Organic Research-Ireland) (4’,6’-diamidino-2-phenylindole) 0.0001% (w/v) for 10 minutes, washed again in distilled water and dried (to aid cell localization, slides were cover with antifade citi-fluor solution). Microscopic cell count (DAPI) and oligonucleotide probe-positive count (Cy3) were performed using a Nikon Eclipse E800 microscope (Japan) equipped with a specific DAPI filter and G-2A filter sets. A minimum of 20 view squares were enumerated for each well; two wells were examined in total.

2.5. Assays of Growing in Mineral Enriched Media

Four tubes containing 20 mL of mineral media containing distilled water and NaCl (Sigma-Aldrich Germany) (8.0 g∙L1), KCl (Merck Germany) (0.8 g∙L1) and 20% of Glucose (Merck Germany) or Peptone (DIFCO UK), respectively, were inoculated with 1 mL of irradiated bacteria. The turbidity at 650 nm was measured after 18, 24, and 96 h of incubation and the increase in 0.1 or more turbidity units was reported as positive growth.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Simulated Solar Light Arradiation on Culturability and Viability of S. Typhimurium Cells in Absence of Ferric Ions and H2O2

The initial S. typhimurium concentration before irradiation events, evaluated with DVC FISH and MPN methods, achieved concentrations two logs higher than the PC method (Figure 2). Although there is no difference between the nutrient composition of a liquid and a solid culture media, in practice the culture broths have a higher

Figure 2. Inactivation of S. typhimurium by simulated solar light (500 W∙m2) at pH 5.5 followed by -■-PC, -◆-MPN and -▲-DVC FISH.

rate of cell recovery. In solid media (PC method) the bacteria growing is limited by the availability of water and nutrients close to the colony’s growing area while the liquid media (MPN and Nalidixic media) ensures constant and direct contact of cell with nutrients. This could explain why DVC-FISH and MPN gave initial concentrations higher than PC.

On the other hand, results obtained by MPN and PC (Figure 2) revealed that after 240 min of solar simulated irradiation, the former method showed that Salmonella population underwent a decreasing of almost 2 logs while the later did not show any decreasing of bacterial concentration. Furthermore, DVC FISH viability count underwent a slight decreasing of its initial concentration (~1 log) after of 240 min of solar simulated irradiation. The experiments were followed by 48 h in dark conditions and the results showed that DVC FISH and MPN did not undergo neither decreasing nor re-growth on the bacterial population. However PC method showed a slight decreasing of almost 1 log probably due to the fact that under these conditions weakened microorganisms (by UV irradiation) could undergo an additional stress by the lack of nutrients. This decreasing of E. coli population after a photocatalytic treatment (in presence of TiO2 and solar simulated light) under dark conditions was already observed by Rincon and Pulgarin [21] and referred as post-irradiation events.

In summary, the three methods used in this study (DVC FISH, MPN and PC) revealed that direct solar simulated irradiation had slight negative effect on the S. typhimurium population. It is well known that UV-C component (220 - 280 nm) of UV light is the most lethal to the microorganisms since it might produce chemical changes on the DNA components [22]. Solar simulator emits few UV-C light irradiation (Figure 1) and this fact could explain why light irradiation did not affect in a larger extent of the initial concentration of S. typhimurium. However, the UV-A (320 - 400 nm) is emitted by the solar simulator and some studies have argued that this UV component could affect the activity of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, and could also produce partial degradation of iron-containing proteins, releasing Fe (II) ions into the cell [23, 24]. Thus, only the presence of UV-A light could generate a bacteria weakening by diminishing its antioxidant capacity without producing a lethal damage.

3.2. Effect of Photo-Fenton Process at near Neutral pH on Culturability and Viability of S. typhimurium Cells

Figure 3 shows that culturability measured by MPN and PC was strongly affected by photo-Fenton process at pH 5.5. Results obtained by MPN revealed a diminution of 4 logs after 240 min of simulated solar irradiation and PC

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] J. J. Pignatello, E. Oliveros and A. MacKay, “Advanced Oxidation Processes for Organic Contaminant Destruction Based on the Fenton Reaction and Related Chemistry,” Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2006, pp. 1-84. doi:10.1080/10643380500326564
[2] A. G. Rincon and C. Pulgarin, “Comparative Evaluation of Fe3+ and TiO2 Photoassisted Processes in Solar Photocatalytic Disinfection of Water,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, Vol. 63, No. 3-4, 2006, pp. 222-231. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2005.10.009
[3] S. Malato, P. Fernández-Ibanez, M. I. Maldonado, J. Blanco and W. Gernjak, “Decontamination and Disinfection of Water by Solar Photocatalysis: Recent Overview and Trends,” Catalysis Today, Vol. 147, No. 1, 2009, pp. 1-59. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2009.06.018
[4] D. Spuhler, J. A. Rengifo-Herrera and C. Pulgarin, “The Effect of Fe2+, Fe3+, H2O2 and the Photo-Fenton Reagent at near Neutral pH on the Solar Disinfection (SODIS) at Low Temperatures of Water Containing Escherichia coli K-12,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, Vol. 96, No. 1-2, 2010, pp. 126-141. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.02.010
[5] I. García-Fernández, M. I. Polo-López, I. Oller and P. Fernández-Ibánez, “Bacteria and Fungi Inactivation Using Fe3+/Sunlight, H2O2/Sunlight and near Neutral Photo-Fenton: A Comparative Study,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, Vol. 121-122, 2012, pp. 20-29. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.03.012
[6] M. Berney, H.-U. Weilenmann, A. Simonetti and T. Egli, “Efficacy of Solar Disinfection of Escherichia coli, Shigella flexneri, Salmonella typhimurium and Vibrio cholera,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, Vol. 101, No. 4, 2006, pp. 828-836. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02983.x
[7] F. Sciacca, J. A. Rengifo-Herrera, J. Wéthé and C. Pulgarin, “Dramatic Enhancement of Solar Disinfection (SO-DIS) of Wild Salmonella sp. in PET Bottles by H2O2 Addition on Natural Water of Burkina Faso Containing Dissolved Iron,” Chemosphere, Vol. 78, No. 9, 2010, pp. 1186-1191. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.12.001
[8] A. Moncayo-Lasso, L. E. Mora-Arizmendi, J. A. Rengifo-Herrera, J. Sanabria, N. Benitez and C. Pulgarin, “The Detrimental Influence of Bacteria (E. coli, Shigella and Salmonella) on the Degradation of Organic Compounds (and Vice-Versa) in TiO2 Photocatalysis and near Neutral Photo-Fenton Processes under Simulated Solar Light,” Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 5, 2012, pp. 821-827. doi:10.1039/c2pp05290c
[9] D. B. Roszak and R. R. Colwell, “Survival Strategies of Bacteria in the Natural Environment,” Microbiological Reviews, Vol. 51, No. 3, 1987, pp. 365-379.
[10] G. V. Mukamolova, A. S. Kaprylants, D. B. Kell and M. Young, “Adoption of the Transiently Non-Culturable State: A Bacterial Survival Strategy?” Advances in Microbial Physiology, Vol. 47, 2003, pp. 65-129. doi:10.1016/S0065-2911(03)47002-1
[11] A. P. Caro, J. Got, S. Lesne, A. Binard and B. Baleux, “Viability and Virulence of Experimentally Stressed Nonculturable Salmonella typhimurium,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 65, No. 7, 1999, pp. 3229-3232.
[12] J. S. Lesne, S. Berthet, A. Binard, J. Rouxel and F. Humbert, “Changes of Culturability and Virulence of Salmonella typhimurium during Long-Term Starvation under Dessicating Conditions,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, Vol. 60, No. 2-3, 2000, pp. 195-203. doi:10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00311-1
[13] L. A. Bjergbaek and P. Roslev, “Formation of Nonculturable Escherichia coli in Drinking Waters,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, Vol. 99, No. 5, 2005, pp. 1090-1098. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02706.x
[14] C. Almeida, N. F. Azevedo, R. M. Fernandez, C. W. Keewil and M. J. Vieira, “Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization Method Using a Peptide Nucleic Acid Probe for Identification of Salmonella spp. in a Broad Spectrum Samples,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 76, No. 13, 2010, pp. 4476-4485. doi:10.1128/AEM.01678-09
[15] T. García-Armisen and P. Servais, “Enumeration of Viable E. coli in Rivers and Wastewaters by Fluorescent in situ Hybridization,” Journal of Microbiological Methods, Vol. 58, No. 2, 2004, pp. 269-279. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2004.04.014
[16] S. P. Rivera, L. Flores and J. Sanabria, “Standardization of a Quantification Method for Salmonella spp. and Shigella spp. in Specific Liquid Media,” Colombia Médica, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2010, pp. 60-70.
[17] R. I. Amann, L. Krumholz and D. A. Stahl, “Fluorescent-Oligonucleotide Probing of Whole Cells for Determinative, Phylogenetic, and Environmental Studies in Microbiology,” Journal of Bacteriology, Vol. 172, No. 2, 1990, pp. 762-770.
[18] K. Kogure, U. Simidu and N. A. Taga, “A Tentative Direct Microscopic Method for Counting Living Marine Bacteria,” Canadian Journal of Microbiology, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1979, pp. 415-420.
[19] Regnault, S. Martin-Delautre and P. Grimont, “Problems Associated with the Direct Viable Count Procedure Applied to Gram-Positive Bacteria,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2000, pp. 281-284. doi:10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00204-X
[20] S. Norsdentoft, H. Christensen and H. C. Wegener, “Evaluation of a Fluorescence Labelled Oligonucleotide Probe Targeting 23S rRNA for in Situ Detection of Salmonella serovars in Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Sections and Their Rapid Identification in Bacterial Smears,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Vol. 35, No. 10, 1997, pp. 2642-2648.
[21] A. G. Rincon and C. Pulgarin, “Bactericidal Action of Illuminated TiO2 on Pure Escherichia coli and Natural Bacteria Consortia: Post Irradiation Events in the Dark and Assessment of the Effective Disinfection Time,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, Vol. 49, No. 2, 2004, pp. 99-112. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2003.11.013
[22] W. A. M. Hijnen, E. F. Beerendonk and G. J. Medema, “Inactivation Credit of UV Radiation for Viruses, Bacteria and Protozoan (oo)Cysts in Water: A Review,” Water Research, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2006, pp. 3-22. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2005.10.030
[23] R. B. Kapuscinski and R. Mitchell, “Solar Irradiation Induces Sublethal Injury in Escherichia coli in Seawater,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 41, No. 3, 1981, pp. 670-674.
[24] J. A. Imlay, “Cellular Defenses against Superoxide and Hydrogen Peroxide,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, Vol. 77, No. 1, 2008, pp. 755-776. doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061606.161055
[25] H. Gallard, J. De Laat and B. Legube, “Spectrophotometric Study of the Formation of Iron(III)—Hydroperoxy Complexes in Homogeneous Aqueous Solutions,” Water Research, Vol. 33, No. 13, 1999, pp. 2929-2936. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00007-X
[26] J. D. Oliver, “Recent Findings of on the Viable but Non Culturable State in Pathogenic Bacteria,” FEMS Microbiology Reviews, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2010, pp. 415-425.
[27] L. Fang, P. Cai, W. Chen, W. Liang, Z. Hong and Q. Huang, “Impact of Cell Wall Structure on the Behaviour of Bacterial Cells in the Binding of Cooper and Cadmium,” Colloid Surface A, Vol. 347, No. 1, 2009, pp. 50-55. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.11.041
[28] Z. Cheng and Y. Li, “What Is Responsible for the Initiating Chemistry of Iron-Mediated Lipid Peroxidation: An update,” Chemical Reviews, Vol. 107, No. 3, 2007, pp. 748-766. doi:10.1021/cr040077w
[29] A. Chatti, N. Messaoudi, M. Mihoub and A. Landoulsi, “Effects of Hydrogen Peroxide on the Motility, Catalase and Superoxide Dismutase of Dam and/or seqA Mutant of Salmonella typhimurium,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2012, pp. 129-133. doi:10.1007/s11274-011-0801-8
[30] M. R. Barer, R. J. Smith, R. P. Cooney and P. T. Kimmitt, “Relationships between Culturability, Activity and Virulence in Pathogenic Bacteria,” Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2000, pp. 108-111. doi:10.1007/PL00012148
[31] I.-S. Kong, T. C. Bates, A. Hülsmann, H. Hassan, B. E. Smith and J. D. Oliver, “Role of Catalase and oxyR in the Viable but Nonculturable State of Vibrio vulnificus,” FEMS Microbiology Ecology, Vol. 50, No. 3, 2004, pp. 133-142. doi:10.1016/j.femsec.2004.06.004
[32] I. J. Sanabria, J. Wist and C. Pulgarin, “Photocatalytic Disinfection Treatments: Viability, Culturability and Metabolic Changes of E. coli Using Different Measurement Methods,” DYNA-Colombia, Vol. 78, No. 166, 2011, pp. 150-157.
[33] J. D. Oliver, M. Dagher and K. Linden, “Induction of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium into the Viable but Nonculturable State Following Chlorination of Wastewater,” Journal of Water and Health, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2005, pp. 249-257.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.