Is the Use of Empirically Designed Custom Soft Contact Lenses a Good Option for Challenging Patients?

Frank Spors, Donald J. Egan, Lance E. McNaughton, Jie Shen, Matthew J. Lampa

Pacific University, College of Optometry, Forest Grove, USA.
Western University of Health Sciences, College of Optometry, Pomona, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/ojoph.2013.33014                

Abstract

Purpose: Reasons for the lack of success for contact lens patients range from poor fit, to discomfort or to a less than optimum wearing schedule. This project was a preliminary investigation of customized soft toric contact lenses as an alternative for unsuccessful contact lens patients or potential drop-outs. Methods: Fifteen healthy non-compromised, previously unsuccessful contact lens wearing patients (13 women, 2 men) with ages from 21 to 33 years (25.1 ± 2.7 years) were the subjects for this study. They were empirically fitted with 15 astigmatic and 5 spherical customized SpecialEyes soft contact lenses. Visual acuities, comfort, lens movement, and rotation were evaluated. Results: Patients fitted with customized SpecialEyes soft contact lenses had statistically significant better visual acuities than with Phoropter Manifest Refraction. The lenses used in this study centered well and moved no more than 1 mm upon each blink. Lens rotation was less than 10 degrees for all toric lenses. Patients gave very positive vision and comfort ratings. Conclusion: This preliminary study supports the application of a software program to empirically design and manufacture Special Eyes custom soft lenses based upon corneal topographical parameters and subjective manifest refraction for those patients who either have challenging corneal parameters, high sphero-cylindrical prescriptions, or are currently dissatisfied with their contact lenses and are potential drop-outs.

Keywords

Soft Contact Lenses; Custom Contact Lenses; Toric Contact Lenses; Contact Lenses for Astigmatism; Empirical Contact Lens Fitting

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	J. Tan, E. Papas, N. Carnt, et al., “Performance Standards for Toric Soft Contact Lenses,” Optometry & Vision Science, Vol. 84, No. 5, 2007, pp. 422-428. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e318059063b
[2]	N. Efron, P. B. Morgan and C. A. Woods, “International Survey of Contact Lens Prescribing for Extended Wear,” Optometry & Vision Science, Vol. 89, No. 2, 2012, pp. 122-129. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e31823ee077
[3]	N. Pritchard, D. Fonn and D. Brazeau, “Discontinuation of Contact Lens Wear: A Survey,” International Contact Lens Clinic, Vol. 26, No. 6, 1999, pp. 157-162. doi:10.1016/S0892-8967(01)00040-2
[4]	J. L. Schlanger, “A Study of Contact Lens Failures,” Journal of the American Optometric Association, Vol. 64, No. 3, 1993, pp. 220-224.
[5]	G. Young, “Why One Million Contact Lens Wearers Dropped out,” Contact Lens & Anterior Eye, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2004, pp. 83-85.
[6]	G. Young, S. Coleman and S. Hickson-Curran, “Clinical Evaluation of Toric Soft Lens Reproducibility,” Optometry & Vision Science, Vol. 79, No. 5, 2002, pp. 321-328. doi:10.1097/00006324-200205000-00012
[7]	L. A. Hall, G. Young, J. S. Wolffsohn and C. Riley, “The Influence of Corneoscleral Topography on Soft Contact Lens Fit,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Vol. 52, No. 9, 2011, pp. 6801-6806. doi:10.1167/iovs.11-7177
[8]	L. B. Szczotka, C. Roberts, E. E. Herderick and A. Mahmoud, “Quantitative Descriptors of Corneal Topography that Influence Soft Toric Contact Lens Fitting,” Cornea, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2002, pp. 249-255. doi:10.1097/00003226-200204000-00003
[9]	T. Reddy, L. B. Szczotka and C. Roberts, “Peripheral Corneal Contour Measured by Topography Influences Soft Toric Contact Lens Fitting Success,” CLAO Journal, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2000, pp. 180-185.
[10]	P. J. Caroline and M. P. Andre, “The Effect of Corneal Diameter on Soft Lens Fitting, Part 1,” Contact Lens Spectrum, 1 April 2002.
[11]	P. J. Caroline and M. P. Andre, “The Effect of Corneal Diameter on Soft Lens Fitting, Part 2,” Contact Lens Spectrum, 1 May 2002.
[12]	R. L. Davis and P. D. Becherer, “Techniques for Improved Soft Lens Fitting,” Contact Lens Spectrum, 1 August 2005.
[13]	D. A. Berntsen, M. M. Merchea, K. Richdale, C. J. Mack and J. T. Barr, “Higher-Order Aberrations When Wearing Sphere and Toric Soft Contact Lenses,” Optometry & Vision Science, Vol. 86, No. 2, 2009, pp. 115-122. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e318194e951
[14]	C. Snyder, “Evaluation of ‘High-Cylinder’ Toric Soft Contact Lenses,” International Contact Lens Clinic, Vol. 24, No. 5, 1997, pp. 160-165. doi:10.1016/S0892-8967(97)00057-6
[15]	G. E. Dallal and L. Wilkinson, “An Analytic Approximation to the Distribution of Lilliefors Test Statistic for Normality,” The American Statistician, Vol. 40, No. 4, 1986, pp. 294-296.
[16]	C. Riley, R. L. Chalmers and N. Pence, “The Impact of Lens Choice in the Relief of Contact Lens Related Symptoms and Ocular Surface Findings,” Contact Lens & Anterior Eye, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2005, pp. 13-19. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2004.09.002
[17]	J. Shen and L. N. Thibos, “Peripheral Aberrations and Image Quality for Contact Lens Correction,” Optometry & Vision Science, Vol. 88, No. 10, 2011, pp. 1196-1205. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182279fd5