Religious Practice and Attitudes towards Offenders

Lucas Marcelo Rodriguez, José Eduardo Moreno

1“Teresa de ávila” Faculty, Catholic University of Argentina, Paraná, Argentina 2Mathematical and Experimental Psychology Interdisciplinary Research Center, National Research Council.
1“Teresa de ávila” Faculty, Catholic University of Argentina, Paraná, Argentina 2Mathematical and Experimental Psychology Interdisciplinary Research Center, National Research Council,.

DOI: 10.4236/psych.2013.48089                

Abstract

This ex post facto study aims to investigate the influence of religious practice on the types of reaction to situations of offence. A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to evaluate the relationship between religious practice and the attitudes towards offenders. The study was carried out with adolescents and young people of both sexes. The sample comprised 673 male and female, with an average age of 18.28 and standard desviation of 1.21. As regards the religion that they practiced: 555 were catholic (82.5%) 39 were evangelical (5.8%) and others 79 (11.7%). To assess the level of religious practice, a grid with items containing the frequency of religious practice was prepared, taking into account the person’s self perception. The second instrument used was the Attitudes Towards Offenders Questionnaire (ATOQ). This instrument consists of seven scales, grouped into three factors: passive, aggressive and prosocial behavior, corresponding to the different responses to situations of offence: submission, denial, vengeance, resentment, hostility, claim for an explanation and forgiveness. The result of MANOVA of the tree factors of ATOQ, according to religious practice (practitioner, occasional practitioner and not practitioner), stated a significant difference. When analyzing the contrasts we can see that practitioners are less aggressive with respect to occasional practitioners and non practitioners. As regards the prosocial factor, the only significant contrast is shown in practitioners, who have a higher average of prosocial attitudes compared to non-practitioners.

Keywords

Religious Practice; Forgiveness; Adolescence; Prosocial Attitudes

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Alberti, R. E. (1977). Assertiveness: Innovations, applications, issues. San Luis Obispo, CA: Impact.
[2]	Ashy, M., Mercurio, A. E., & Malley-Morrison, K. (2010). Apology, forgiveness, and reconciliation: An ecological world view framework. Individual Differences Research, 8, 17-26.
[3]	Bar-On, R. (1994). EQI: The emotional quotient inventory. Doctoral Dissertation, Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University.
[4]	Bock, J. G. (2002). Sharpening conflict management: Religious leadership and the two-edged sword. Westwood, Connecticut: Praeger.
[5]	Carretero, A. (2010). En torno a las fórmulas alternativas de religiosidad. La re-elaboración de nuevas modalidades de vínculo comunitario. Athenea Digital, 17, 119-136. http://psicologiasocial.uab.es/athenea/index.php/atheneaDigital/article/view/663
[6]	Cjeka, M. A., & Bamat, T. (2003). Artisans of peace: Grassroots peacemaking among Christian communities. New York: Orbis, Maryknoll.
[7]	Costa, P., & McCrae R. (1995). The revised NEO personality inventory. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.
[8]	Derogatis, L. R. (1977). SCL-90 (revised) version manual-1. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Universty.
[9]	Enright, R. D., Maria, J. D. S., & Radhi, A. L. (1989). The adolescent as forgiver. Journal of Adolescence, 12, 95-110. doi:10.1016/0140-1971(89)90092-4
[10]	Enright, R. D., & Rique, J. (2004). The enright forgiveness inventory sampler set manual, instrument, and scoring guide. Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden.
[11]	Fromm, E. (1973). The anatomy of human destructiveness. New York: Henry Holt.
[12]	Kancyper, L. (2006). Resentimiento y remordimiento. Buenos Aires: Lumen.
[13]	Kohlberg, L. (1975). Collected papers on moral development and moral education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
[14]	Laufer, A., Raz-Hamama, Y., Levine, S., & Solomon, Z. (2009). Posttraumatic growth in adolescence: The role of religiosity, distress, and forgiveness. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28, 862-880. doi:10.1521/jscp.2009.28.7.862
[15]	Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
[16]	Lepore, S. J., & Revenson, T. A. (2006). Resilience and posttraumatic growth: Recovery, resistance, and reconfiguration. In L. G. Calhoun, & R. G. Tedeschi (Eds.), Handbook of posttraumatic growth, research and practice (pp. 24-46). Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
[17]	Moreno, J. E., & Fernández, C. (2011). Empatía y flexibilidad yoica, su relación con la agresividad y la prosocialidad. Límite. Revista de Filosofía y Psicología, 23, 41-55.
[18]	Moreno, J. E., & Pereyra, M. (2000). Cuestionario de Actitudes ante Situaciones de Agravio. Manual. Libertador San Martín, Entre, Ríos: Universidad Adventista del Plata.
[19]	Murphy, P., Ciarrochi, J. W., Piedmont, R. L., Cheston, S., Peyrot, M., & Fitchett, G. (2000). The relation of religious belief and practices, depression, and hopelessness in persons with clinical depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 1102-1106. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.68.6.1102
[20]	Mussen, P., & Eisenberg, N. (1977). Caring, sharing, and helping: The roots of prosocial behavior in children. San Francisco: Freeman.
[21]	Nelson, W. M. (1978). Diccionario Ilustrado de la Biblia. Miami: Editorial Caribe.
[22]	Pereyra, M. (1995). Hope-hopelessness as a diagnostic and predictive variable in the health-illness process. Doctoral Dissertation, Córdoba (Argentina): Universidad Católica de Córdoba.
[23]	Pereyra, M. (1996). Development and validation of an instrument to mesure hope-hopelessness. Acta Psiquiátrica y Psicológica de América Latina, 42, 247-259.
[24]	Royal Spanish Academy (RAE) (2012). Diccionario de la Lengua Espanola. http://www.rae.es/rae.html
[25]	Roche Olivar, R. (1998). Psicología y educación para la prosocialidad. Bs. As.: Ciudad Nueva.
[26]	Roche Olivar, R. (1999). Desarrollo de la inteligencia emocional y social desde los valores y actitudes prosociales en la escuela. Bs. As.: Ciudad Nueva.
[27]	Scheler, M. (1998). El resentimiento en la moral. Madrid: Caparrós.
[28]	Scholter, W. F., Olff, M., Ventevogel, P., De Vries, G. J., Jansveld, E., Lopes Cardozo, B., & Gotway Crawford, C. A. (2004). Mental health symptoms following war and repression in eastern Afghanistan. The Journal of the American Medicine Association, 292, 585-593. doi:10.1001/jama.292.5.585
[29]	Spielberger, C. D., Johnson, E. H., Russell, S. F., Crane, R. J., Jacobs, G. A., & Warden, T. J. (1985). The experience and expression of anger: Construction and validation of an anger expression scale. In M. A. Chesney, & R. H. Rosenman (Eds), Anger and hostility in cardiovascular and behavioral disorders (pp. 5-30). Washington DC: Hemisphere.
[30]	Staub, E. (1975). To rear a prosocial child: Reasoning, learning by doing and learning by teaching others. In D. J. De Palma, & J. M. Foley (Eds.), Moral development: Current theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[31]	Taylor, A. J. W., Nailatikau, E., & Walkey, F. H. (2002). A hostage trauma in Fiji. Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies, 6, 1174-4707.
[32]	Vergote, A. (1969). Psicología religiosa. Madrid: Taurus.
[33]	Wispé, L. G. (1972). Positive forms of social behavior: An overview. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 1-19. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1972.tb00029.x
[34]	Worthington, E. L., Kurusu, T. A., Collins, W., Berry, J. W., Ripley, J. S., & Baier, S. N. (2000). Forgiving usually takes time: A lesson learned by studying interventions to promote forgiveness. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 28, 3-20.