Share This Article:

Late Anatomic Findings after “Rescue CABG” for Peri-Operative Ischemia Following Aortic Root Replacement

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:444KB) PP. 70-76
DOI: 10.4236/wjcs.2013.32012    3,138 Downloads   4,515 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Background: Acute myocardial ischemia, seen in about 2% of aortic root replacements (ARR), is acutely life-threatening, manifesting as failure to wean from bypass, ventricular fibrillation, or unstable hemodynamics. The exact precipitating anatomic cause is usually not apparent at the time of surgery. In this report, we take advantage of late computed tomographic (CT) angiograms of long-term survivors of peri-operative ischemia after ARR to determine what abnormalities of the coronary button reattachments produced the peri-operative ischemia. Methods: The database of the Aortic Institute at Yale-New Haven was reviewed to identify all patients undergoing ARR over a 15-year period. Operative records, patient charts, and CT angiograms of patients who had peri-operative ischemia were reviewed in detail, including analysis by an imaging specialist. Results: 271 patients underwent ARR, 220 with mechanical and 51 with biological valved conduits. Hospital mortality was 2.95%. Clinical follow-up ranged from 1 to 182 months. Survival in discharged patients was 97.7% at 5 years and 95.2% at 7 years. Peri-operative ischemia was seen in 4 of 271 patients (1.5%). All four affected patients survived—with interventions including supplemental coronary bypass grafts (4 patients), intra-aortic balloon pump placement (2 patients), and left ventricular assist device insertion (1 patient). Late CT angiograms revealed severe but non-obstructive left main calcification serving as a focal point for coronary angulation in 2 patients, angulation without calcification in 1 patient, and totally normal anatomy in 1 patient. Conclusions: Myo- cardial ischemia after ARR is rare but acutely life-threatening. Prompt recognition and treatment by supplemental coronary artery bypass grafting preserves life and leads to good late survival. Intramural calcification (non-obstructive) of the distal left main coronary artery predisposes to angulation after coronary button creation and should be a “red flag” for this potential problem.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

A. Ramarathnam, A. Javier, E. Farkas, D. Cornfeld, M. Tranquilli and J. Elefteriades, "Late Anatomic Findings after “Rescue CABG” for Peri-Operative Ischemia Following Aortic Root Replacement," World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol. 3 No. 2, 2013, pp. 70-76. doi: 10.4236/wjcs.2013.32012.

References

[1] H. Bentall and A. De Bono, “A Technique for Complete Replacement of the Ascending Aorta,” Thorax, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1968, pp. 338-339. doi:10.1136/thx.23.4.338
[2] B. P. van Putte, S. Ozturk, S. Siddiqi, M. A. Schepens, R. H. Heijman and W. J. Morshuis, “Early and Late Outcome after Aortic Root Replacement with a Mechanical Valve Prosthesis in a Series of 528 Patients,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2011, Epub.
[3] I. E. Platis, G. S. Kopf, M. L. Dewar, R. K. Shaw and J. A. Elefteriades, “Composite Graft with Coronary Button Reimplantation: Procedure of Choice for Aortic Root Replacement,” International Journal of Angiology, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1998, pp. 41-45. doi:10.1007/BF01616275
[4] B. Lima, C. G. Hughes, A. Lemaire, et al., “Short-Term and Intermediate-Term Outcomes of Aortic Root Replacement with St. Jude Mechanical Conduits and Aortic Allografts,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 82, No. 2, 2006, pp. 579-585. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.03.068
[5] S. Westaby, T. Katsumata and G. Vaccari, “Aortic Root Replacement with Coronary Button Re-Implantation: Low Risk and Predictable Outcome,” European Journal Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2000, pp. 259-265. doi:10.1016/S1010-7940(00)00347-X
[6] I. Hatzaras, G. J. Koullias, M. Tranquilli, H. Achneck and J. A. Elefteriades, “Mid-Term Thromboembolic and Bleeding Complications Are Minimal after Composite Graft Replacement of the Aortic Root,” International Journal of Angiology, Vol. 14, 2005, pp. 118-112. doi:10.1007/s00547-005-2050-x
[7] H. E. Achneck, J. A. Rizzo, M. Tranquilli and J. A. Elefteriades, “Safety of Thoracic Aortic Surgery in the Present Era,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 84, 2007, pp. 1180-1185. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.05.038
[8] A. Shahriari, M. Eng, M. Tranquili and J. A. Elefteriades, “Rescue Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) after Aortic Composite Graft Replacement,” Journal of Cardiac Surgery, Vol. 24, No. 4, 2009, pp. 392-396. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8191.2008.00762.x
[9] L. Svensson, “Management and Complications of Aortic Dissection,” American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, New Orleans, 2004.
[10] G. J. Byrne, A. N. Karavas, M. Leacche, et al., “Impact of Concomitant Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting on Hospital Survival after Aortic Root Replacement,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 79, No. 2, 2005, pp. 511-516. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.07.063
[11] E. H. Kincaid, A. R. Cordell, J. W. Hammon, et al., “Coronary Insufficiency after Stentless Aortic Root Replacement: Risk Factors and Solutions,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 83, No. 3, 2007, pp. 964-968. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.09.021
[12] R. M. Donaldson and D. N. Ross, “Replacement of the Ascending Aorta and Aortic Valve with a Composite Graft: Results and Follow-Up in 71 Patients,” The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol. 29, No. 4, 1981, pp. 195-199. doi:10.1055/s-2007-1023476
[13] C. Cabrol, A. Pavie, I. Gandjbakhch, et al., “Complete Replacement of the Ascending Aorta with Reimplantation of the Coronary Arteries,” The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol. 79, 1980, pp. 388-401.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.