Share This Article:

Ten Years of Vegetation Change in Northern California Marshlands Detected Using Landsat Satellite Image Analysis

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:3567KB) PP. 485-494
DOI: 10.4236/jwarp.2013.55048    5,288 Downloads   7,658 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

The Landsat Ecosystem Disturbance Adaptive Processing System (LEDAPS) methodology was applied to detect changes in perennial vegetation cover at marshland sites in Northern California reported to have undergone restoration between 1999 and 2009. Results showed extensive contiguous areas of restored marshland plant cover at 10 of the 14 sites selected. Gains in either woody shrub cover and/or from a recovery of herbaceous cover that remains productive and evergreen on a year round basis could be mapped out from the image results. However, LEDAPS may not be highly sensitive changes in wetlands that have been restored mainly with seasonal herbaceous cover (e.g., vernal pools), due to the ephemeral nature of the plant greenness signal. Based on this evaluation, the LEDAPS methodology would be capable of fulfilling a pressing need for consistent, continual, low-cost monitoring of changes in marshland ecosystems of the Pacific Flyway.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

C. Potter, "Ten Years of Vegetation Change in Northern California Marshlands Detected Using Landsat Satellite Image Analysis," Journal of Water Resource and Protection, Vol. 5 No. 5, 2013, pp. 485-494. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2013.55048.

References

[1] California Regional Water Quality Control Board, “Policy and Guidelines on the Use of Wastewater to Create, Restore, Maintain, and/or Enhance Marshlands, San Francisco, Bay Region,” 1977. http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/sanfranciscobay
[2] California Wetlands Tracker, “California Wetlands Portal,” 2012. http://www.californiawetlands.net/tracker/ba/list
[3] R. M. Wilson, “Seeking Refuge: Birds and Landscapes of the Pacific Flyway,” University of Washington Press, Seattle, 2010.
[4] California Natural Resources Agency (CNRA), “State of the State’s Wetlands, 10 Years of Challenges and Progress,” California Natural Resources Agency, Sacramento, 2010.
[5] J. G. Masek, et al., “North American Forest Disturbance Mapped from a Decadal Landsat Record,” Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 112, No. 6, 2008, pp. 2914-2926. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2008.02.010
[6] E. P. Crist and R. C. Cicone, “Application of the Tasseled-Cap Concept to Simulated Thematic Mapper Data,” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol. 50, No. 3, 1984, pp. 343-352.
[7] C. Huang, B. Wylie, L. Yang, C. Homer and G. Zylstra, “Derivation of a Tasseled-Cap Transformation Based on Landsat-7 at-Satellite Reflectance,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 23, No. 8, 2002, pp. 1741-1748. doi:10.1080/01431160110106113
[8] R. J. Kauth and G. S. Thomas, “The Tasseled-Cap—A Graphic Description of the Spectral-Temporal Development of Agricultural Crops as Seen by Landsat,” Proceedings, Symposium on Machine Processing of Remotely Sensed Data, West Lafayette, 1976, pp. 41-51.
[9] S. P. Healey, W. B. Cohen, Y. Zhiqiang and O. N. Krankina, “Comparison of Tasseled-Cap-Based Landsat Data Structures for Use in Forest Disturbance Detection,” Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 97, No. 3, 2005, pp. 301-310. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2005.05.009
[10] W. B. Cohen and S. N. Goward, “Landsat’s Role in Ecological Applications of Remote Sensing,” BioScience, Vol. 54, No. 6, 2004, pp. 535-545. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0535:LRIEAO]2.0.CO;2
[11] H. T. Harvey and Associates, “Marsh Plant Associations of South San Francisco Bay,” Prepared for the City of San Jose, Environmental Services Agency, San Jose, 2003. www.sanjoseca.gov/Archive.aspx?ADID=1396
[12] E. B. Watson, “Marsh Expansion at Calaveras Point Marsh, South San Francisco Bay, California,” Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, Vol. 78, No. 4, 2008, pp. 593-602. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2008.02.008
[13] J. Christian-Smith, “Managing for Multiple Benefits: Farming, Flood Protection, and Habitat Restoration in the Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area,” Pacific Institute, Oakland, 2010.
[14] Jones and Stokes, “Napa River Salt Marsh Restoration Project Final Environmental Impact Statement,” Sacramento, 2004.
[15] California State Coastal Conservancy (SCC), “Hamilton & Bel Marin Keys Unit V Wetlands Restoration Project,” California State Coastal Conservancy, Oakland, 2011.
[16] Phillip Williams & Associates (PWA), “Bair Island Existing Hydrologic Conditions Assessment,” Phillip Williams & Associates, San Francisco, 2000.
[17] H. T. Harvey and Associates, “Bair Island Restoration Project Monitoring Plan,” State Coastal Conservancy, Oakland, 2004.
[18] Delta Risk Management Strategy (DRMS), “Phase 2, Building Block 3.1: Breach Dikes in Suisun Marsh 2011. http://www.water.ca.gov/floodsafe/fessro/levees/drms
[19] City of American Canyon, “Executive Summary/Letter of Intent City of American Canyon Wetlands Restoration Project,” American Canyon, 1997.
[20] National Park Service (NPS), “Giacomini Wetlands Restoration: A Legacy for Tomales Bay,” Department of the Interior, San Francisco, 2010.
[21] US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), “Sonoma Baylands Wetland Demonstration Project—Demonstration Project Report and Environmental Assessment,” US Army Corps of Engineers, San Francisco, 1994.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.