Gingival biotype: The probe test utility

Madline Cuny-Houchmand, Stéphane Renaudin, Mustapha Leroul, Lucie Planche, Laurent Le Guehennec, Assem Soueidan

Cellule de Promotion de la Recherche Clinique, CHU, Nantes, France.
Department of Orthodontics, UFR d’Odontologie, Nantes, France.
Department of Periodontology, UFR d’Odontologie, Nantes, France.
Department of Prosthodontics, UFR d’Odontologie, Nantes, France.

DOI: 10.4236/ojst.2013.32023                

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the relevance of the probe test in classifying the gingival biotype and to determine if differences exist between maxillary and mandibular gingival biotypes in the same patient. Materials and Methods: 53 subjects were included. The gingival thickness was evaluated as thick or thin. This evaluation was based on the transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin while probing the sulcus. In another hand, 124 clinicians were asked to identify the gingival biotype in the same 53 subjects based on visual inspection on pictures. For each examiner, the accuracy in identifying the gingival biotype was assessed using the percentage of cases correctly identified. Results: the percentile of agreement is greater than 70% in maxilla as well as in mandible. An imbalance was observed on the maxillary pictures concerning the gingival biotype and on the thin biotype between maxilla and mandible despite there being no statistical difference (p < 0.0001). The percentile of agreement is quite similar in the mandible for both thin (74%) and thick (70%) gingival biotypes. Agreement between mandibular probe and maxilla probe results demonstrates a weak percentile of agreement of gingival biotypes between maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (57%). Conclusion: The use of probe transparency through the gingival margin is an accurate and simple method for gingival biotype diagnosis to discriminate a thin gingival from a thick gingival. Furthermore, individualizing the gingival biotype for each of the arches appears to be a new outcome that needs further investigation.

Keywords

Probe; Gingival Biotype; Prevention; Classification

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Cuny-Houchmand, M., Renaudin, S., Leroul, M., Planche, L., Le Guehennec, L. and Soueidan, A. (2013) Gingival biotype assessement: Visual inspection relevance and maxillary versus mandibular comparison. Open Dentistry Journal, 7, 1-6. doi:10.2174/1874210601307010001
[2]	Muller, H.P. and Eger, T. (1997) Gingival phenotypes in young male adults. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 24, 65-71. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb01186.x
[3]	Muller, H.P., Heinecke, A., Schaller, N. and Eger, T. (2000) Masticatory mucosa in subjects with different periodontal phenotypes. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 27, 621-626. doi:10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027009621.x
[4]	De Rouck, T., Eghbali, R., Collys, K., De Bruyn, H. and Cosyn, J. (2009) The gingival biotype revisited: Transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 36, 428-433. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01398.x
[5]	Vandana, K.L. and Savitha, B. (2005) Thickness of gingiva in association with age, gender and dental arch location. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 32, 828-830. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00757.x
[6]	Kyllar, M. and Witter, K. (2008) Gingival thickness in dogs: Association with age, gender, and dental arch location. Journal of Veterinary Dentistry, 25, 106-109.
[7]	Eghbali, A., De Rouck, T., De Bruyn, H. and Cosyn, J. (2009) The gingival biotype assessed by experienced and inexperienced clinicians. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 36, 958-963. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01479.x
[8]	Fu, J.H., Yeh, C.Y., Chan, H.L., Tatarakis, N., Leong, D.J. and Wang, H.L. (2010) Tissue biotype and its relation to the underlying bone morphology. Journal of Periodontology, 81, 569-574. doi:10.1902/jop.2009.090591
[9]	Cook, D.R., Mealey, B.L., Verrett, R.G., Mills, M.P., Noujeim, M.E., Lasho, D.J. and Cronin, R.J. (2011) Relationship between clinical periodontal biotype and labial plate thickness: An in vivo study. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 31, 345-354.
[10]	Le, D., Zhang, H., Hu, W.J. and Liu, D.G. (2012) Preliminary study on gingival biotype by periodontal probing. Chinese Journal of Stomatology, 47, 81-84.
[11]	Kan, J.Y., Morimoto, T., Rungcharassaeng, K., Roe, P. and Smith, D.H. (2010) Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: Visual versus direct measurement. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 30, 237-243.
[12]	Melsen, B. and Allais, D. (2005) Factors of importance for the development of dehiscences during labial movement of mandibular incisors: A retrospective study of adult orthodontic patients. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 127, 552-561. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.12.026
[13]	Joss-Vassalli, I., Grebenstein, C., Topouzelis, N., Sculean, A. and Katsaros, C. (2010) Orthodontic therapy and gingival recession: A systematic review. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research, 13, 127-141. doi:10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01491.x