Single versus combination therapy in acute tocolysis: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Abstract

This is a prospective controlled randomized trial conducted in 92 women with singleton pregnancies in preterm labor. The tocolytic efficacy and safety of combination atosiban and nifedipine was compared with that of the single agent, atosiban. Both lines of intervention was administered for 48 hours. Progression of labor was assessed by the frequency of uterine contractions and cervical changes. For statistical purpose, intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis was used throughout. Efficacy, as determined by the proportion of women in each group who did not deliver after therapy initiation, was comparable with no significant differences, at 48 hrs (91.5% vs. 91.1%) and at 7 days (90.7% vs. 85.7%) for the atosiban and the combination groups respectively. Safety was assessed by the numbers of adverse events. Maternal side effects were reported more in the combination group (34% vs. 64%; P = 0.006). Perinatal outcomes were similar between the groups. We conclude that the addition of nifedipine did not substantially improve the clinical outcomes beyond that were achieved with atosiban alone. Moreover, it has increased maternal side effects. Future research could focus on combination of other tocolytics.

Share and Cite:

Al-Omari, W. , Begam, M. , Khan, F. , Khudhair, I. and Nagelkerke, N. (2013) Single versus combination therapy in acute tocolysis: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3, 249-256. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2013.32047.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Saigal, S. and Doyle, L.W. (2008) An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet, 371, 261-269. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60136-1
[2] NHMRC (2000) Care around preterm birth. Clinical Practical Guidelines, NHMRC, Australia.
[3] Petrou, S. (2005) The economic consequences of preterm birth during the first 10 years of life. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 112, 10-15. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00577.x
[4] Crowther, C.A., Hiller, J.E. and Doyle, L.W. (2002) Magnesium sulphate for preventing preterm birth in threatened preterm labor. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Article ID: CD001060. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001060
[5] Papatsonis, D., Flenady, V., Cole, S. and Liley, H. (2005) Oxytocin receptor antagonists for inhibiting preterm labor. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 20, Article ID: CD004452.
[6] King, K.J., Flenady, V.J., Papastonis, D.N., Dekker, G.A. and Carbonne, B. (2003) Calcium channel blockers for inhibiting preterm labor. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Article ID: CD002255.
[7] Kashanian, M., Akbarian, A.R., Soltanzadeh, M. (2005) Atosiban and nifedipin for the treatment of preterm labor. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 91, 10-14. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001060
[8] Al-Omari, W.R., Al-Shammaa, H.B., Al-Tikriti, E.M. and Ahmed, K.W. (2006) Atosiban and nifedipine in acute tocolysis: A comparative study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 128, 129-134. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.12.010
[9] Doret, M., Mellier, G., Gaucherand, P., Saade, G.R., Benchaib, M. and Frutoso, J. (2003) The in vitro effect of dual combinations of ritodrine, nicardipine and atosiban on contractility of pregnant rat myometrium. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 110, 731-734. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2003.02443.x
[10] Hajagos-Tóth, J., Kormányos, Z., Falkay, G., Pál, A. and Gáspár, R. (2010) Potentiation of the uterus-relaxing effects of β-adrenergic agonists with nifedipine: studies on rats and the human myometrium. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 89, 1284-1289. doi:10.3109/00016349.2010.512064
[11] Nardin, J.M., Carroli, G. and Alfiveric, Z. (2006) Combination of tocolytic agents for inhibiting preterm labor. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Article ID: CD006169. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006169
[12] Ingemarsson, I. (2005) Combination therapy. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 112, 89-93.
[13] Moutquin, J.M., Sherman, D. and Cohen, H. (2000) Double blind, randomized, controlled trial of atosiban and ritodrine in the treatment of preterm labor: A multicenter effectiveness and safety study. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 182, 1191-1199. doi:10.1067/mob.2000.104950
[14] Goodwin, T.M., Valenzuela, G.J., Silver, H., et al. (1996) Dose ranging study of the oxytocin antagonist atosiban in the treatment of preterm labor. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 88, 331-336. doi:10.1067/mob.2000.104950
[15] Papastonis, D.N., Van Geijn, H.P., Ader, H.J., Lange, F.M., Bleker, O.P. and Dekker, G.A. (1997). Nifedipine and ritodrine in the management of preterm labor: A randomized multicenter trial. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2, 230-234.
[16] RCOG Guidelines No.1 (B) (2002) Tocolytic drugs for women in preterm labor. http://www.rcog.org.uk/womens-health/clinical-guidance/tocolytic-drugs-women-preterm-labour-green-top-1b
[17] The Worldwide Atosiban versus Beta-agonists Study Group (2001) Effectiveness and safety of the oxytocin antagonist atosiban versus beta-adrenergic agonists in the treatment of preterm labor. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 108, 133-142.
[18] The Canadian Preterm Labor Investigators Group (1992) Treatment of preterm labor with the beta-adrenergic agent ritodrine. The New England Journal of Medicine, 327, 208-212. doi:10.1056/NEJM199207163270319
[19] Langhoff-Roos, J., Kesmodel, U., Jacobsson, B., Rasmussen, S. and Vogel, I. (2006) Spontaneous preterm delivery in primiparous women at low risk in Denmark: Population based study. BMJ, 332, 937-939. doi:10.1136/bmj.38751.524132.2F
[20] Office for National Statistics (2005) Mortality statistics: childhood, infant and perinatal. Review of the registrar general on deaths in England and Wales. Office for National Statistics, London.
[21] Haas, D.M., Imperiale, T.F., Kirkpatrick, P.R., Klein, R.W., Zollinger, T.W. and Golichowski, A.M. (2009) Tocolytic therapy: A meta-analysis and decision analysis. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 113, 585-594.
[22] Papatsonis, D., Flenady, V. and Liley, H. (2009) Maintenance therapy with oxytocin antagonists for inhibiting preterm birth after threatened preterm labor. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 21, Article ID: CD-005938.
[23] Lyell, D.J., Pullen, K.M., Mannan, J., Chitkara, U., Druzin, M.L., Caughey, A.B. and El-Sayed, Y.Y. (2008) Maintenance nifedipine tocolysis compared with placebo: A randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 112, 1221-1226. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818d8386
[24] Romero, R., Sibai, B.M., Sanchez-Ramos, L., Valenzuela, G.J., Veille, J.C., Tabor, B., Perry, K.G., Varner, M., Goodwin, T.M., Lane, R., Smith, J., Shangold, G. and Creasy, G.W. (2000) An oxytocin receptor antagonist (atosiban) in the treatment of preterm labor: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with tocolytic rescue. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 182, 1173-1183. doi:10.1067/mob.2000.95834
[25] Hyagriv, N.S. and Steve, N.C. (2007) Prevention of preterm delivery. The New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 477-487. doi:10.1056/NEJMra050435
[26] Oei, S.G. (2006) Calcium channel blockers for tocolysis: A review of their role and safety following reports of serious adverse events. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 126, 137-145. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.03.001
[27] De Heus, R., Mol, B.W., Erwich, J.J., et al. (2009) Adverse drug reactions to tocolytic treatment for preterm labor: Prospective cohort study. BMJ, 338, b744. doi:10.1136/bmj.b744
[28] RCOG Guidelines No.1 (B) (2011) Tocolytic drugs for women in preterm labor. http://www.rcog.org.uk/womens-health/clinical-guidance/tocolytic-drugs-women-preterm-labour-green-top-1b
[29] British National Formulary. http://bnf.org
[30] Anotayanonth, S., Subhedar, N.V., Neilson, J.P. and Harigopal, S. (2004) Betamimetics for inhibiting preterm labor. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Article ID: CD004352.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.