LQR Controller with Kalman Estimator Applied to UAV Longitudinal Dynamics

Abstract

The aim of this study is designing an optimal controller with linear quadratic regulator (LQR) method for a small unmanned air vehicle (UAV). To better evaluate the effect of disturbances on the obtained measurements a Kalman filter is also used in the system. For this purpose a small UAV that is normally used as a radio controlled plane is chosen. The linearized equations for a wings level flight condition and the state space matrices are obtained. An optimal controller using LQR method to control the altitude level is then designed. The effect of the disturbances on the measurements are taken into account and the effectiveness of the Kalman filter in obtaining the correct measurements and achieving the desired control level are shown using the controller designed for the system. The small UAV is commanded to the desired altitude using the LQR controller through the control inputs elevator deflection and thrust rate. The LQR effectiveness matrices are chosen to find the gains necessary to build an effective altitude controller. Firstly the controller is tested under the situation where disturbances are absent. Then a Kalman filter is designed and the system under disturbances is tested with the designed controller and the filter. The results reveal the effectiveness of the Kalman filter and the LQR controller.

Share and Cite:

Hajiyev, C. and Vural, S. (2013) LQR Controller with Kalman Estimator Applied to UAV Longitudinal Dynamics. Positioning, 4, 36-41. doi: 10.4236/pos.2013.41005.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] J. N. Jang, “Longitudinal Stability Augmentation System Design for the Dragon Fly UAV Using a Single GPS Receiver,” AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, Texas, 2003, AIAA 2003-5592.
[2] T. Kinoshita and F. Imado, “A Study on the Optimal Flight Control for an Autonomous UAV,” Proceedings of the IEEE 2006 International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Luoyang, 2006, pp. 996-1001.
[3] S. Franko, “LQR-Based Trajectory Control Of Full Envelope, Autonomous Helicopter,” Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2009, London, 1-3, July 2009.
[4] K. T. Oner, E. Cetinsoy, E. Sirimoglu, C. Hancer, T. Ayken and M. Unel, “LQR and SMC Stabilization of a New Unmanned Aerial Vehicle,” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 34, 2009, pp. 373-378.
[5] I. Masar and E. Stohr, “Gain-Scheduled LQR-Control for an Autonomous Airship,” Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Process Control, Tatranská Lomnica, 14-17 June 2011, pp. 197-204.
[6] F. Santoso, M. Liu and G. K. Egan, “Linear Quadratic Optimal Control Synthesis for an UAV,” 12th Australian International Aerospace Congress, AIAC12, Melbourne, 16-22 March 2007.
[7] M. D. Johnson, A. J. Calise and E. N. Johnson, “Evaluation of an Adaptive Method for Launch Vehicle Flight Control,” Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 2003. doi:10.2514/6.2003-5789
[8] B. D. Anderson and J. B. Moore, “Optimal Control: Linear Quadratic Methods,” Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1990.
[9] C. Hajiyev, “Radio Navigation,” Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, 1999.
[10] A. P. Sage and J. L. Melsa, “Estimation Theory with Applications to Communications and Control,” McGraw Hill, New York, 1971.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.