Improvement of Detection Methods and Further Characterization of Spiroplasma citri, the Causal Agent of Citrus Stubborn Disease in Egypt

Mohamed Mannaa, Anna Maria D’Onghia, Khaled Djelouah, Giuseppe Cavallo, Franco Valentini

CIHEAM-Department of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
CIHEAM-Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Bari, Bari, Italy.

DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2013.42032                

Abstract

Stubborn disease of citrus is one of the main causes of quality deterioration of citrus fruits in Egypt. The early detection and the molecular characterization of the causal agent are vital for revealing its real distribution and for management. In 2011, several samples were collected at different times of the year from stubborn suspected symptomatic trees within the main citrus growing area in Egypt, the Nile-delta region. After culturing the causal agent on artificial LD8 media from the field fresh samples, two new and improved methods of biological indexing were set up and compared with the traditional method in order to increase the detection efficiency by increasing the greenhouse transmission rate; which reached 85% with the new inverse inoculation method. Different PCR primer pairs were evaluated for their detection efficiency of the Egyptian Isolates of Spiroplasma citri and the most specific primer pair for these local isolates was determined. Improving the efficiency of biological indexing, along with determining the most specific and efficient PCR primer pair for the detection, will enhance and facilitate the citrus certification programs in Egypt, making them better tools for the early detection of stubborn disease. Furthermore obtained Egyptian isolates were characterized molecularly by the analysis of the obtained sequences showing close relationship with the Moroccan strain (GII3).

Keywords

Biological Indexing; Spiroplasma citri; PCR; Citrus Stubborn Disease; Egypt

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	W. G. Weisburg, J. G. Tully, D. L. Rose, J. P. Petzel, H. Oyaizu, D. Yang, L. Mandelco, J. Sechrest, T. G. Lawrence, J. Van Etten, J. Maniloff and C. R. Woese, “A Phylogenetic Analysis of the Mycoplasmas: Basis for Their Classification,” Journal of Bacteriology, Vol. 171, No. 12, 1989, pp. 6455-6467.
[2]	F. Nour El-Din, “A Tumor-Enduing Agent Associated with Citrus Trees Infected with Safargali (Stubborn) Disease in UM,” Phytopath, Vol. 57, 1967, pp. 108-113.
[3]	A. A. Abu-Zeid, A. A. Kishtah and E. M. Khalil, “Isolation and Culturing of Spìroplasma citri Associated with Stubborn Disease of Citrus in Egypt,” Journal of Phytopathology, Vol. 20, No. 2, 1988, pp. 139-140.
[4]	fas.usda.gov [Internet], “Citrus: World Markets and Trade, United States Department of Agriculture,” Foreign Agricultural Services, 2011. http://www.fas.usda.gov/htp/2011_Jan_Citrus.pdf
[5]	E. Sheta, E. S. Salem, A. M. Abou-Zeid, M. Osman, M. A. Shafik and A. El-Hawari, “Development of a Citrus Certification Program in Egypt,” Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the International Organization of Citrus Virologists (IOCV), Riverside, 3-6 November 2004, pp. 321-329.
[6]	I. M. Lee and R. E. Davis, “New Media for Rapid Growth of Spiroplasma citri and Corn Stunt Spiroplasma,” Phytopath, Vol. 74, 1983, pp. 84-89. doi:10.1094/Phyto-74-84
[7]	C. N. Roistacher, “Graft-Transmissible Diseases of Citrus. Handbook for Detection and Diagnosis,” FAO, Rome, 1991, p. 286.
[8]	J. J. Doyle, “DNA Protocols for Plants,” In: A. B. Hewitt, B. Johnson and J. P. W. Young, Eds., Molecular Techniques in Taxonomy, NATO Scientific Affairs Division, England, 1991.
[9]	X. Foissac, C. Saillard, J. Gandar, L. Zreik and M. J. Bové, “Spiralin Polymorphism in Strains of Spiroplasma citri Is Not Due to Differences in Posttranslational Palmitoylation,” Journal of Bacteriology, Vol. 178, 1996, pp. 2934-2940.
[10]	R. K. Yokomi, A. F. S. Mello, M. Saponari and J. Fletcher, “Polymerase Chain Reaction Based Detection of Spiroplasma citri Associated with Citrus Stubborn Disease,” Plant Disease, Vol. 92, No. 2, 2008, pp. 253-260. doi:10.1094/PDIS-92-2-0253