Development Process of Intermodal Transport Solutions: The Case of Dedicated Solutions Based on Large Shippers’ Volumes

Edith Sorkina

School of Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

DOI: 10.4236/jtts.2012.24035                

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to create a process view of the development of intermodal transport solution from the basic idea to implementation. Special case of dedicated solutions based on large shippers’ volumes is chosen, where the shippers engage in the development process of the new solutions. Research is conducted using a qualitative approach: multiple case studies. Empirical data has been obtained through in-depth semi-structured interviews with relevant respondents involved in the development projects. Shippers’ perspective on the development process is studied. Development process can be described through a generic four-stage process: Initiation, Planning, Implementation, and Further Development. Different actors and different resources are required at the different stages. The complex process of establishing new intermodal solutions has lacked attention in the intermodal research. Understanding and improving the development process of new intermodal solutions is considered to have an important effect on the viability of intermodal transport and can help to understand the barriers that prevent companies from switching to intermodal. Development process of new dedicated intermodal solutions is a gradual process of building up the transport solution in a continuous interaction between shippers and transport service providers. Research has focused on the shipper perspective on inter-modal transport, showing that switching to an intermodal transport is not simply a mode choice issue, but involves a transition process that takes time, demands resources, cooperation/coordination between multiple parties, may require changes in the supply chain beyond the transport link, involves multiple actors, and involves an industry that is itself in a process of change.

Keywords

Intermodal Transport; Case Study; Development Process; Shipper; Exploratory Study

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, “Terminology on Combined Transport,” 2001. http://www.oecd.org/sti/transport/roadtransportresearch/1941816.pdf
[2]	E. Kreutzberger, C. Macharis, L. Vereecken and J. Woxenius, “Is Intermodal Freight Transport More Environmentally Friendly Than All-Road Freight Transport: A Review,” 2003. http://www.lir.gu.se/digitalAssets/1344/1344833_2003_nectar_umea_kr_ma_ve_wo.pdf
[3]	R. Konings, H. Priemus and P. Nijkamp, “The Future of Intermodal Freight Transport: An Overview,” In: R. Konings, H. Priemus and P. Nijkamp, Eds., The Future of Intermodal Freight Transport, Concepts, Design and Implementation, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 2008, pp. 1-12
[4]	C. Lammgard, “Environmental Perspectives on Marketing of Freight Transports,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 2007.
[5]	J. Woxenius and B. B?rthel, “Intermodal Road-Rail Transport in the European Union,” In: R. Konings, H. Priemus and P. Nijkamp, Eds., The Future of Intermodal Freight Transport, Concepts, Design and Implementation, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, 2008, pp. 13-33.
[6]	European Commission, “EU transport in figures,” 2011. http://ec.europa.eu/transport/publications/statistics/doc/2011/pocketbook2011.pdf
[7]	European Commission, “White Paper: Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area—Towards a Competitive and Resource Efficient Transport System,” 2011. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0144:FIN:en:PDF
[8]	A. Jensen, “Combined Transport: Systems, Economics and Strategies,” The Swedish Transport Research Board, Stockholm, 1990.
[9]	A. Jensen, “Designing Intermodal Transport Systems: A Conceptual and Methodological Framework,” In: R. Konings, H. Priemus and P. Nijkamp, Eds., The Future of Intermodal Freight Transport, Concepts, Design and Implementation, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, 2008, pp. 187-205.
[10]	F. B?rthel and J. Woxenius, “The Dalecarlian Girl— Evaluation of the Implementation of the Light-Combi Concept,” 2003. http://www.fek.handels.gu.se/digitalAssets/1344/1344831_2003_ags_tokyo_dalkullan.pdf
[11]	F. B?rthel and J. Woxenius, “Developing Intermodal Transport for Small Flows Over Short Distances,” Journal of Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 27, No. 5, 2004, pp. 403-424. doi:10.1080/0308106042000287586
[12]	F. E. Larsson and D. Kollberg, “Overcoming the Obstacles of Intermodal Transport—A Shipper Perspective on the Effects of Modal Shift,” Master Thesis, University of Lund, Lund, 2009.
[13]	L. Sj?stedt, J. Woxenius and L. Hulten, “Flexibility versus Specialization on the Controllability of Combined Transport Systems,” 1994. http://130.241.192.19/Files/foretagsekonomi/LoT/Johan/Publitions/Reviewed_articles/1994_IFAC_Controllability.pdf
[14]	R. Bergqvist, G. Falkemark and J. Woxenius, “Establishing Intermodal Terminals,” World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2010, pp. 286302. doi:10.1504/WRITR.2010.034667
[15]	R. Bergqvist, J. Birgander, F. B?rthel, A. Jensen, P. O. Persson and J. Thalenius, “Nya Aspekter P? Intermodala Transportkedjor,” 2008. www.sir-c.se/getfile.ashx?cid=257832&cc=3&refid=26
[16]	European Commission, “Study on Freight Integrators,” 2003. http://ec.europa.eu/transport/logistics/documentation/freight_integrators/doc/final_report_freight_integrators.pdf
[17]	P. Evers, D. Harper and P. Needham, “The determinants of shipper perceptions of modes,” Transportation Journal, Vol. 36, No. 2, 1996, pp. 13-25.
[18]	A. Bryman and E. Bell, “Business Research Methods,” Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003.
[19]	J. Floden, F. B?rthel and E. Sorkina, “Modal Choice in Europe—A Literature Review from the Transport Customers’ Perspective,” 2010. http://130.241.192.19/Files/foretagsekonomi/LoT/Johan/Publications/Reviewed_articles/ 1994_IFAC_Controllability.pdf