Defining Economics in the Twenty First Century

Bhekuzulu Khumalo

Private Researcher, Toronto, Canada.

DOI: 10.4236/me.2012.35079                

Abstract

Economics as a subject matter has been given a variety of definitions over the last 200 years, however all the definitions have a similar concept that they lean towards, a general principle one can say. The definitions are not wrong, this paper does not seek to prove that they are wrong, but only to show they where right for their time, a subject matter like economics, though studied over the centuries only formally became a discipline in its own right in the last two centuries, and as such is fairly young and as we know more there perhaps is a time to seek a definition for economics for the twenty first century. This paper seeks to give such a definition in light of the increased understanding of economics or at the least we have access to greater information concerning the discipline economics than say Adam Smith, Alfred Marshall or Hayek. Take the definition by Samuelson, “Economics is the study of how societies use scarce resources to produce valuable commodities and distribute them among different people”, though correct, is the definition sufficient for the twenty first century and beyond, that is all this paper seeks to answer, for it is the definition of a discipline that guides the readers thoughts. The objective of this paper is to simply reaffirm the modern definition of what is economics given we know so much more than 100 years ago.

Keywords

Definition of Economics; Knowledge; Modern Definition; Choice; Scarcity

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	R. M. Ayers and R. A. Collinge, “Economics; Explore and Study,” Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, 2005.
[2]	M. Zafirovski, “Human Rational Behavior and Economic Rational-ity,” Electronic Journal of Sociology, 2003. www.sociology.org
[3]	A. Heller, “Renaissance Man,” Rout-ledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1978.
[4]	P. A. Samuelson and W. D. Nordhaus, “Economics,” McGraw-Hill, New York, 1992.
[5]	R. Lipsey and K. A. Chrystal “Positive Economics,” Ox- ford University Press, Oxford, 1995.
[6]	R. Heilbroner, “The Worldly Philosophers: The Lives, Times and Ideas of the Great Economic Thinkers,” Simon and Schuster, New York, 1980.
[7]	www.search.com/reference/Political_economy
[8]	L. Robbins, “An Essay on the Significance of Economic Science,” MacMillan and Co., London, 1945.
[9]	J. S. Mill, “Principles of Political Economy Books 4 and 5,” Penguin Books, London, 1848.
[10]	B. Khumalo, “The Fundamental Theory of Knowledge,” 2006. www.repec.org.
[11]	L. Tzu, “Tao Te Ching,” Translated by D. C Lau, Penguin Books, London, 1963.
[12]	K. McCormick, “Veblen in Plain English,” Cambria Press, New York, 2006.
[13]	D. Neef, “The Know-ledge Economy,” Butterworth- Heinemann, Woburn, 1998.
[14]	F. A. Hayek, “The Road to Serfdom,” Routledge, London, 1944.
[15]	R. L. Heilbroner and L. Thurow, “Eco-nomics Explained,” Touchstone, New York, 1982.
[16]	“What Is Economics,” 2010. Vanderbilt.edu
[17]	M. Porter, “The Competitive Advantage of Nations,” Free Press, New York, 1990.
[18]	J. Dewer, “Intelligence in the Modern World,” Random House, New York, 1939.
[19]	D. Warsh, “Knowledge and the Wealth of Nations; a Story of Economic Discovery,” W. W. Norton and Co., New York, 2006.
[20]	F. A. Hayek, “The Use of Knowledge in Society,” Ameri- can Economic Review, Vol. 35, No. 4, 1945, pp. 519-530.
[21]	F. A. Hayek, “Hayek on Hayek,” University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1994.
[22]	K. Dopfer and J. Potts, “The General Theory of Economic Evolution,” Routledge, Abingdon, 2008
[23]	B. Khumalo, “Defining Economics in the Twenty First Century (Research Note),” International Advances in Eco- nomic Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2012, pp. 128-129.
[24]	B. Khumalo, “The Variable Time: Crucial to Understand- ing Knowledge Economics,” Icfai University Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2009, pp. 34-67.