Poetry Teaching and Multimodality: Theory into Practice

Daniel Xerri

Department of English, University of Malta Junior College, Msida, Malta.

DOI: 10.4236/ce.2012.34077                

Abstract

This article discusses the theoretical concepts underpinning a multimodal approach to poetry teaching and considers a number of ways in which this can be adopted in practice. It discusses what is entailed by the concept of multimodality and examines the claims made about the benefits of employing a multimodal approach. It reviews the literature on multimodality and examines how teachers may blend a variety of techniques and resources in order not just to engage their students with poetry but also to activate language learning. In particular, this article examines how by tapping students’ visual and digital literacy skills they are enabled to create video poems, podcasts, hypertexts and wikis, all of which represent new ways of using language and experiencing poetry. Through constant reference to the research carried out so far, this article seeks to show how by means of a multimodal approach poetry can act as a springboard for the development of students’ language proficiency and creative engagement.

Keywords

Poetry; Multimodality; Student Engagement; Digital Technology

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Albers, P. (2006). Imagining the possibilities in multimodal curriculum design. English Education, 38, 75-101.
[2]	Alvermann, D. E. (2009). Reaching/teaching adolescents: Literacies with a history. In J. V. Hoffman, & Y. M. Goodman (Eds.), Changing literacies for changing times: An historical perspective on the future of reading research, public policy, and classroom practices (pp. 98-107). New York: Routledge.
[3]	Andrews, R. (2004). Conclusion. In R. Andrews (Ed.), The impact of ICT on literacy education (pp. 202-214). London: Routledge Falmer.
[4]	Andrews, R., Burn, A., Leach, J., Locke, T., Low, G., & Torgerson, C. (2002). A systematic review of the impact of networked ICT on 5 -16 year olds’ literacy in English. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
[5]	Archer, A. (2010). Multimodal texts in Higher Education and the implications for writing pedagogy. English in Education, 44, 201-213. doi:10.1111/j.1754-8845.2010.01073.x
[6]	Azzopardi, M. (2008). Perceptions about the use of computers as literacy aids for young learners. B.Ed. Dissertation, Malta: University of Malta.
[7]	Bennett, S., Matton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The “digital natives” debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 775-786. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x
[8]	Blake, J. (2008). The magpie teacher on poetry and storytelling. NATE Classroom, 4, 27-29.
[9]	Blake, J. (2009). Using the Poetry Archive in the English classroom. English Drama Media, 13, 24-28.
[10]	Browner, S., Pulsford, S., & Sears, R. (2000). Literature and the Internet. New York: Garland Publishing.
[11]	Burn, A., & Durran, J. (2007). Media literacy in schools: Practice, production and progression. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
[12]	Burn, A., & Leach, J. (2004). A systematic review of the impact of ICT on the learning of literacies associated with moving image texts in English, 5-16. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
[13]	Cachia, R., Ferrari, A., Ala-Mutka, K., & Punie, Y. (2010). Creative learning and innovative teaching: Final report on the study on creativity and innovation in education in the EU member states. Luxembourg: European Union.
[14]	Charles, T. (2008). Poetry for SEN and EAL students. In Making hard topics in English easier with ICT (pp. 39-44). Sheffield: NATE. URL (last checked 27 March 2012). http://www.nate.org.uk/cmsfiles/ict/h2t/NATE_Hard_to_Teach_Case_Studies.pdf
[15]	?uku?i?, M., Grani?, A., Mifsud, C., & Zammit, M. (2008). A best practice approach to the enhancement of the learning experience. In D. Remenyi (Ed.), The proceedings of the 7th European conference on e-learning (Vol. 1) (pp. 253-263). Reading: Academic Publishing.
[16]	Dressman, M. (2010). Let’s poem: The essential guide to teaching poetry in a high-stakes, multimodal world. New York: Teachers College Press.
[17]	Dymoke, S. (2009). Teaching English texts 11-18. London: Continuum.
[18]	Dymoke, S., & Hughes, J. (2009). Using a poetry Wiki: How can the medium support pre-service teachers of English in their professional learning about writing poetry and teaching poetry writing in a digital age? English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 8, 91-106.
[19]	Edwards-Groves, C. J. (2010). The multimodal writing process: Changing practices in contemporary classrooms. Language and Education, 25, 49-64. doi:10.1080/09500782.2010.523468
[20]	Galea, L. (2001). Creating new leaders for e-culture: Keynote address by the Maltese minister of education. Ministry of Education, Employment and the Family. URL (last checked 9 February 2012). http://www.education.gov.mt/ministry/doc/pdf/eCulture_Full.pdf
[21]	Gilbert, A. (2006). Another future: Poetry and art in a postmodern twilight. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
[22]	Grani?, A., Mifsud, C., & ?uku?i?, M. (2009). Design, implementation and validation of a Europe-wide pedagogical framework for e-Learning. Computers & Education, 53, 1052-1081. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.018
[23]	Hughes, J. (2009). Poets, poetry and new media: Attending to the teaching and learning of poetry. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.
[24]	Jewitt, C. (2005). Technology, literacy and learning: A multimodal approach. London: Routledge.
[25]	Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203164754
[26]	Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Abingdon: Routledge.
[27]	Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Bourne, J., Franks, A., Hardcastle, J., Jones, K., & Reid, E. (2005). English in urban classrooms: A multimodal perspective on teaching and learning. Abingdon: RoutledgeFalmer.
[28]	Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold Publishers.
[29]	Locke, T., & Andrews, R. (2004). A systematic review of the impact of ICT on literature-related literacies in English 5-16. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
[30]	Low, G., & Beverton, S. (2004). A systematic review of the impact of ICT on literacy learning in English of learners between 5 and 16, for whom English is a second or additional language. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
[31]	McBride, K.D. (2004). Introduction. In K. D. McBride (Ed.), Visual media and the humanities: A pedagogy of representation (pp. xi-xix). Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
[32]	McMillan, C. (2008). Using podcasting to improve close analysis of language in poetry. In Making hard topics in English easier with ICT (pp. 113-130). Sheffield: NATE. URL (last checked 27 March 2012). http://www.nate.org.uk/cmsfiles/ict/h2t/NATE_Hard_to_Teach_Case_Studies.pdf
[33]	McVee, M. B., Bailey, N. M., & Shanahan, L. E. (2008). Using digital media to interpret poetry: Spiderman meets Walt Whitman. Research in the Teaching of English, 43, 112-143.
[34]	McVerry, J. G. (2007). Power of posting poetry: Teaching new literacies. Language Arts Journal of Michigan, 23, 51-56.
[35]	Miller, S. M. (2007). English teacher learning for new times: Digital video composing as multimodal literacy practice. English Education, 40, 61-83.
[36]	Miller, S.M. (2010). Reframing multimodal composing for student learning: Lessons on purpose from the Buffalo DV project. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 197-219.
[37]	Ministry for Infrastructure, Transport and Communications. (n.d.). The smart island: The national ICT strategy for Malta 2008-2010. URL (last checked 9 February 2012). https://mitc.gov.mt/MediaCenter/PDFs/1_ICT%20Strategy%202008-10.pdf
[38]	Mortlock, C. (2008). Engaging with poetry. In Making hard topics in English easier with ICT (pp. 33-38). Sheffield: NATE. URL (last checked 27 March 2012). http://www.nate.org.uk/cmsfiles/ict/h2t/NATE_Hard_to_Teach_Case_Studies.pdf
[39]	Murphy, K. (2008). Analysing the language of poetry through podcasts. In Making hard topics in English easier with ICT (pp. 107-112). Sheffield: NATE. URL (last checked 27 March 2012). http://www.nate.org.uk/cmsfiles/ict/h2t/NATE_Hard_to_Teach_Case_Studies.pdf
[40]	National Association for the Teaching of English (2007). ICT in English: A NATE position paper. URL (last checked 8 February 2012). http://www.nate.org.uk/cmsfiles/ict/NATE_Position_Paper_on_ICT_in_English.doc
[41]	National Association for the Teaching of English (2008). Making hard topics in English easier with ICT. Sheffield: NATE. URL (last checked 27 March 2012). http://www.nate.org.uk/cmsfiles/ict/h2t/NATE_Hard_to_Teach_Case_Studies.pdf
[42]	National Association for the Teaching of English. (2009). Entitlement to ICT in secondary English. URL (last checked 10 February 2012). http://www.nate.org.uk/cmsfiles/ict/Seconday_English_entitlement_document_2009.pdf
[43]	National Council of Teachers of English (2005). NCTE position statement: On multimodal literacies. URL (last checked 26 March 2012). http://www.ncte.org/positions/statements/multimodalliteracies
[44]	National Council of Teachers of English. (2008). NCTE position statement: Definition of 21st-century literacies. URL (last checked 26 March 2012). http://www.ncte.org/positions/statements/21stcentdefinition
[45]	New London Group (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60-92.
[46]	Ofsted. (2009). English at the crossroads: An evaluation of English in primary and secondary schools, 2005/08. London: Ofsted.
[47]	Richardson, A. (2008). Building learning power with wikis. In Making hard topics in English easier with ICT (pp. 65-74). Sheffield: NATE. URL (last checked 27 March 2012). http://www.nate.org.uk/cmsfiles/ict/h2t/NATE_Hard_to_Teach_Case_Studies.pdf
[48]	Snapper, G. (2009). Editorial. English Drama Media, 13, 2-3.
[49]	Sprackland, J. (2008). The Poetry Archive. NATE Classroom, 4, 30.
[50]	Sprackland, J. (2009). The ear is the best reader. English Drama Media, 13, 21-23.
[51]	Templer, B. (2009). Poetry in motion: A multimodal teaching tool. Humanising Language Teaching, 11. URL (last checked 4 April 2012). http://www.hltmag.co.uk/oct09/sart06.htm
[52]	The Guardian (2009). Who’s got the P factor? URL (last checked 21 March 2012). http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/video/2009/jul/07/poetry-primary-schools
[53]	Tippings, L. (2008). Enlivening the study of poetry with Year 8. In Making hard topics in English easier with ICT (pp. 45-47). Sheffield: NATE. URL (last checked 27 March 2012). http://www.nate.org.uk/cmsfiles/ict/h2t/NATE_Hard_to_Teach_Case_Studies.pdf
[54]	Torgerson, C., & Zhu, D. (2003). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of ICT on literacy learning in English, 5-16. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
[55]	Tweddle, S., Adams, A., Clarke, S., Scrimshaw, P., & Walton, S. (1997). English for tomorrow. Buckingham: Open University Press.
[56]	Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
[57]	Unsworth, L., Thomas, A., Simpson, A., & Asha, J. (2005). Children’s literature and computer based teaching. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
[58]	Zammit, L. (2004). ICT literacy and education in Malta. Department of Technology in Education. URL (last checked 11 February 2012). http://schoolnet.gov.mt/dtie/ICT%20Literacy.doc
[59]	Zammit, M., & Mifsud, C. (2003). Language learning and teaching in Malta. In D. Newby (Ed.), Mediating between theory and practice in the context of different learning cultures and languages (pp. 137-148). Graz: Council of Europe.