The Right to Carbon Emission: A New Right to Development

Zewei Yang

Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

DOI: 10.4236/ajcc.2012.12009                

Abstract

For the past few years, the international community has regarded the right to carbon emission as a new right to development. The legal basis of this mainly includes “the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change”, “the Kyoto Protocol” as well as the sustainable development principle, the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and the principle of fairness and justice, etc. The distribution of the right to carbon emission of the post-Kyoto age should consider the need of development, population, historical responsibility, the principle of fairness and justice and other factors. As a dominant country of greenhouse gas emission, on the premise of sticking to “the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities”, China should achieve the transformation from the “difference principle” to “common responsibilities” progressively. Meanwhile, in strengthening coordination with developing countries, China should appropriately support the requests of the Alliance of Small Island States and the least developed countries and attach importance to the issue of the right to development in the distribution of the right to carbon emission.

Keywords

Climate Change; The Right to Carbon Emission; The Right to Development

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	L. Han, “On Legal Issues of Emission Rights Trade of International Greenhouse Gas,” China Legal Publishing House, Beijing, 2009, p. 29.
[2]	A. M. Halvorssen, “Common, but Differentiated Commitments in the Future Climate Change Regime—Amending the Kyoto Protocol to Include Annex C and the Annex C Mitigation Fund,” Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law & Policy, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2007, pp. 247266.
[3]	J. M. Yang, “Global Climate Change Diplomacy and China’s Policy,” Shi Shi Publishing House, Shanghai, 2009, pp. 243-245.
[4]	The National Development and Reform Commission, “China’s National Climate Change Programme,” The National Development and Reform Commission, Beijing, 2007.
[5]	E. A. Posner and C. R. Sunstein, “Climate Change Justice,” Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 96, No. 4, 2007-2008, p. 1603.
[6]	A. Mumma and D. Hodas, “Designing A Global Post— Kyoto Climate Change Protocol that Advances Human Development,” Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, Vol. 20, No. 4, 2007-2008, p. 639.
[7]	A. Sen, “Development as Freedom,” Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999, p. 18.
[8]	B. A. Green, “Lessons from the Montreal Protocol: Guidance for the Next International Climate Change Agreement,” Environmental Law, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2009, p. 281.
[9]	Jan Hancock, “Environmental Human Rights,” Ashgate Publishing, Farnham, 2003, pp. 59-63.
[10]	The Office of China National Climate Change Programme Coordination Group and the Centre for China’s 21 Century Agenda Management, “Global Climate Change: A Challenge for Humankind,” The Commercial Press, Beijing, 2004, p. 2.
[11]	United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, “Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Thirteenth Session,” The Conference of the Parties, Bali, 3-15 December 2007.
[12]	N. Schrijver, “The Evolution of Sustainable Development in International Law: Inception, Meaning and Status,” Recueil des Cours (Hague Academy of International Law), Vol. 329, No. 1, 2007, p. 217.
[13]	S. Q. Cai., et al., “Sustainable Development and Legal System of Environmental Resources,” China Legal Publishing House, Beijing, 2003, pp. 14-15.
[14]	United Nations, “Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development,” World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg, 26 August-4 September 2002. http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/aconf199d20&cl_en.pdf
[15]	A. M. Halvorssen, “Global Response to Climate Change— From Stockholm to Copenhagen,” Denver University Law Review, Vol. 85, No. 4, 2007-2008, p. 846.
[16]	G. Y. Zhuang and Y. Chen, “International Climate Regime and China,” World Affairs Press, Beijing, 2005, p. 251.
[17]	X. Yang, “On the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change—International Law and Comparative Law Perspective,” China Legal Publishing House, Beijing, 2007, p. 133.
[18]	C. D. Stone, “Common but Differentiated Responsibilities in International Law,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 98, No. 2, 2004, pp. 276-301. doi:10.2307/3176729
[19]	The United Nations Climate Change Conference, “Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao Speaks at the Leaders’ Meeting of the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen,” Copenhagen, 18 December 2009. http://www.gov.cn/ldhd/2009-12/19/content_1491149.htm
[20]	E. Vermeersch, “Reading the Kyoto Protocol: Ethical Aspects of the Convention on Climate Change,” Eburon Uitgeverij B.V., Delft, 2005, p. 84.
[21]	S. Johnson, “Climate Change and Global Justice: Crafting Fair Solutions for Nations and Peoples,” Harvard Environmental Law Review, Vol. 33, No. 2, 2009, pp. 297-301.
[22]	J. Rawls, “A Theory of Justice,” Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1971, p. 55.
[23]	A. Torvanger, et al., “A Survey of Differentiation Methods for National Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets, Centre for International Climate and Environmental Research—Oslo Report,” 1999, p. 5;
[24]	D. Bodansky, “International Climate Efforts Beyond 2012: A Survey of Approaches,” The Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Washington DC, 2004, pp. 1-35.
[25]	http://www.globalcommons.org
[26]	W. Y. Chen, et al., “The Distributing Method of ‘the Two Convergences’ of Global Carbon Emission Rights,” Tsinghua University Journal, No. 6, 2005, pp. 850-853.
[27]	The Energy Institute of the National Development and Reform Commission, “Collected Works on Energy Issues,” China Environment Science Press, Beijing, 2009, p. 296.
[28]	M. den Elzen, et al., “FAIR 2.0: A Decision—Support Tool to Assess the Environmental and Economic Consequences of Future Climate Regimes,” RIVM Report 2003, Netherland, 2003.
[29]	J. H. Pan, “Fulfilling Basic Development Needs with Low Emissions—China’s Challenges and Opportunities for Building a Post—2012 Climate Regime,” In: T. Sugiyama, Ed., Governing Climate: The Struggle for a Global Framework beyond Kyoto, International Institute for Sustainable Development, Tokyo, 2005, pp. 87-208.
[30]	W. X. Wu, “On Environment Right—Public Law Perspective,” Law Press, Beijing, 2007, p. 127.
[31]	The Project Group of International Human Rights Law Textbook, “International Human Rights Law Textbook,” China Political and Law Press, Beijing, 2002, p. 464.
[32]	R. Tol, “Estimates of the Damage Costs of Climate Change,” Environmental & Resource Economics, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2002, pp. 135-160. doi:10.1023/A:1014539414591
[33]	International Energy Agency, “CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 1971-2004,” Organization for Economic, Paris, 2006.
[34]	The United Nations Development Program, “Human Development Report 2007/2008,” The United Nations, 2007/ 2008, pp. 40-41.
[35]	World Resources Institute’s Climate Analysis Indicators Tool. http://cait.wri.org
[36]	D. A. Farber, “Basic Compensation for Victims of Climate Change,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 155, No. 4, 2007, p. 1605.
[37]	B. A. Green, “Lessons from the Montreal Protocol: Guidance for the Next International Climate Change Agreement,” Environmental Law, Vol. 39, 2009, p. 279.
[38]	The United States, “Expressing the Senses of the Senate Regarding the Conditions for the United States Becoming a Signatory to Any International Agreement on Greenhouse Gas Emissions Under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change,” The 105th Congress, Washington DC, 1997.
[39]	M. Weisslitz, “Rethinking the Equitable Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibility: Differential versus Absolute Norms of Compliance and Contribution in the Global Climate Change Context,” Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law & Policy, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2002, p. 477.