Share This Article:

Evaluating Subdivisions for Identifying Extraneous Flow in Separate Sanitary Sewer Systems

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:1019KB) PP. 334-341
DOI: 10.4236/jwarp.2012.46037    6,366 Downloads   8,620 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Separate sanitary sewer systems are designed to convey sewage waste from municipal areas to a central treatment facility; they are not designed to handle water associated with precipitation events. However, intercept of groundwater (infiltration) and of flows through manholes or unauthorized connections (inflows) introduces rainwater into the sanitary sewer system. Infiltration/Inflow (I/I) increases the costs associated with treatment and can create additional environmental problems. Identifying and quantifying the volume I/I can be complicated and costly. A simple quantitative method was developed to quantify the extent of I/I occurring in sewer sheds. The method uses measured sewer flows, water usage, precipitation values, and land cover data to calculate the volume of extraneous flows. To assess its utility, the method was used to compare two urban sewer sheds, Holiday Knolls and Eagle View. Both sewer sheds showed evidence of I/I in excess of 200 gallons per day per inch-mile of sewer pipe (gpd/in-mile). Holiday Knolls, the older subdivision had an average I/I of 1912 gpd/in-mile, while Eagle View had an average of 1143 gpd/in-mile. The devel- oped method provided simple means to calculate I/I and to identify sewer sheds in need of repair.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

A. Lanning and E. W. Peterson, "Evaluating Subdivisions for Identifying Extraneous Flow in Separate Sanitary Sewer Systems," Journal of Water Resource and Protection, Vol. 4 No. 6, 2012, pp. 334-341. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2012.46037.

References

[1] F.-H. Lai, “Review of Sewer Design Criteria and RDII Prediction Methods,” United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, 2008, p. 30.
[2] National Small Flows Clearinghouse, “Infiltration and Inflow Can be Costly for Communities,” Pipeline, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1999, p. 1.
[3] J. B. Ellis, “Sewer Infiltration/Exfiltration and Interactions with Sewer Flows and Groundwater Quality,” Interurba II, Lisbon, 19-22 February 2001, pp. 311-319.
[4] Metcalf & Eddy Inc., “Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal and Re-Use,” 3rd Edition, McGraw Hill, London, 1991.
[5] G. Weiss, H. Brombach and B. Haller, “Infiltration and Inflow in Combined Sewer Systems: Long-Term Analysis,” Water Science and Technology, Vol. 45, No. 7, 2002, p. 11.
[6] C. Karpf and P. Krebs, “Sewers as Drainage Systems— Quantification of Groundwater Infiltration,” Novatech Conference, Lyon, 6-10 June 2004, pp. 969-975.
[7] United States Environmental Protection Agency, “Sewer System Infrastructure Analysis and Rehabilitation,” United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, 1991, p. 105.
[8] National Weather Service, “WFO Monthly/Daily Climate Data Bloomington IL Airport,” 2011. http://www.crh.noaa.gov/product.php?site=ILX&issuedby=BMI&product=CF6&format=CI&version=11&glossary=0
[9] H. B?ckman, “Infiltration/Inflow in Separate Sewer Systems,” Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden, 1985.
[10] H. Wittenberg and H. Brombach, “Hydrological Determination of Groundwater Drainage by Leaky Sewer Systems,” International Conference on Water Resources and Environment Research, Dresden, 22-26 July 2002, pp. 138-143.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.