Identification of the child with influenza A (H1N1): Clinical criteria versus the rapid influenza A-B test

Jesus Reyna-Figueroa, Karla Maldonado-Silva, Ana Elena Limon-Rojas

Department of Pediatrics, High Specialty Central South Hospital, PEMEX, Mexico City, Mexico.

DOI: 10.4236/ojpm.2012.22032                

Abstract

Introduction: During the influenza A (H1N1) pandemic infection, the Ministry of Health in Mexico recommended that it be considered as a suggestive clinical picture in patients with fever, cough and headache. In some places where the resource was available, the rapid seasonal influenza (A-B) test was used as an alternative identification strategy. Methods: From April 2009 to May 2010, patients under 18 years of age with acute respiratory tract symptoms were included in a retrospective study. They underwent the following procedures: 1) application of the clinical criteria recommended by the federal Ministry of Health during the A (H1N1) pandemic; 2) rapid test for seasonal influenza (A-B), and 3) search for the influenza A (H1N1) virus by means of the real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The study was approved by the research and ethics committee at the Central South Hospital of the government-owned Mexican Petroleum Company (PEMEX). Results: One hundred and thirty pediatric patients with a median age of eight years and a range between one and 17 years were included. Taking into account the Ministry of Health’s criteria, we found the following: 50% sensitivity, 69% specificity, 80% positive predictive value and 27% negative predictive value versus the rapid test that displayed 82% sensitivity, 70% specificity, 80% positive predictive value and 27% negative predictive value. Conclusions: Clinical criteria display low sensitivity in the infected children studied, whereas the rapid influenza A-B test constitutes a better option to identify these patients.

Keywords

Diagnosis; Influenza H1N1; Efficacy; Criteria; Rapid Test

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	The Members of the Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Investigation. (2009) Emergence of a Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A (H1N1) Virus in Humans. The New England Journal of Medicine, 360, 2605-2615. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0903810
[2]	Vidal, P., Reyna, J. and Richardson, V. (2011) Events temporarily associated with anti-influenza A (H1N1) vaccination in Mexico. Archives of Medical Research, Available on line 27 October 2011. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0188440911002104
[3]	Hernández, M.A. (2009) Novel influenza [A (H1N1) 2009]; suspect case definition. Review of agreement on case definition criteria used in different Spanish regions. Revista Pediatría de Atención Primaria, 11, 383-98
[4]	González, C.J., Iglesias, C.J.M., Romero, A.Y., Chávez, C.C., Gay, M.J.G. and Rivas, R.R. (2011) Cost-effectiveness in the detection on influenza H1N1;clinical data versus rapid tests. The Pan American Journal of Public Health, 29, 1-8.
[5]	Figueroa, C., Nu?ez, L., Aranda, D., Gómez, S., Osorio, E. and Vargas, H. (2009) Consistent analysis of four test for the detection of Influenza A in Bogotá. University of Colombia i Bogota, 50, 444-451
[6]	Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010) Interin guidance on case definition to be used for investiga- tions of novel influenza A (H1N1) cases. http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/casedef.htm
[7]	Castro, C.L.A., Llaca, D.J., Pérez, C.F.E., Gómez, E.A. and Flóres, A.A. (2011) Comparative study of a rapid testing with real time RT-PCR for diagnosis of influenza AH1N1 2009. Salud Publica de México, 53, 329-333. doi:10.1590/S0036-36342011000400007
[8]	QuickVue Influenza A+B 25 Test Kit. Quidel Corporation, San Diego. Available in: http://www.quidel.com/libraries/pkginserts/RD/QVInfluenzaAB_ModComplex.pdf
[9]	Suess, T., Buchholz, U., Dupke, S., Grunow, R., an der Heiden, M., Heider, A., et al. (2010) Shedding and transmission of novel influenza virus A/H1N1 infection in households—Germany 2009. American Journal of Epidemiology, 171, 1157-1164. doi:10.1093/aje/kwq071
[10]	Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2006) Rapid diagnostic testing for influenza: Information for clinical laboratory directors. US Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta. http://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/diagnosis/rapidlab.htm
[11]	Kasper, M.R., Wierzba, F.T., Sovann, L., Blair, J.P. and Put-nam, D.S. (2010) Evaluation of an influenza-like illness case definition in the diagnosis of influenza among patients with acute febrile illness in Cambodia. BMC Infectious Diseases, 10, 320. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-10-320
[12]	Boivin, G., Hardy, I., Tellier, G. and Maziade, J. (2000) Predicting influenza infections during epidemics with use of a clinical case definition. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 31, 1166-1169. doi:10.1086/317425
[13]	Navarro, M.J.M., Pérez, R.M., Cantudo, M.P., Petit, G.C., Jiménez, V.M. and Rosa, F.M. (2005) Influenza-like illness criteria were poorly related to laboratory-confirmed influenza in a sentinel surveillance study. Journal of Clinical epidemiology, 58, 275-279. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.08.014
[14]	Friedman, M.J. and Attia, M.W. (2004) Clinical predictors of influenza in children. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 158, 391-394.
[15]	Ohmit, S.E. and Monto, A.S. (2006) Symptomatic predictors of influenza. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 43, 564-568. doi:10.1086/506352
[16]	Hawkes, M. (2010) Sensitivity of rapid influenza diagnostic testing for Swine-Origin 2009 A (H1N1) influenza virus in children. Pediatrics, 125, e639-e644. doi:10.1542/peds.2009-2669
[17]	Cruz, A. (2010) Performance of a rapid influenza test in children during the H1N1 2009. Pediatrics, 125, e645-e650. doi:10.1542/peds.2009-3060