Falling Weight Impact and Indentation Damage Characterisation of Sandwich Panels for Marine Applications

Daniele Ghelli, Oris D’Ubaldo, Carlo Santulli, Eugenio Nisini, Giangiacomo Minak

.

DOI: 10.4236/ojcm.2012.21002                

Abstract

On three configurations of laminates for nautical use, impact and indentation properties have been compared, in the understanding that these represent two different and significant cases in the laminate service, namely contact with fal- ling body and ramming. All the laminate configurations were fabricated using the same stacking sequence of E-glass mats (of weight 225 and 600 g/m²) as skins, while the core was obtained with different types of rigid PVC foams in the case of A laminate (HEREX C-75) and in that of B and C laminates (COLTH C-55). The latter laminates are also protected with Gelcoat on the outer side. The resin used for A and B laminates was a conventional vynilester (DISTITRON VE 100 SC), while for C laminate a polyester-based including some non-oil derived components was used (ENVIREZ 1807). Laminates of each of the three configurations have been impacted from 1, 1.5 and 2 meters with a 1.25 kg mass using a 12.7 mm hemispherical nose, therefore yielding impact energies of 12.25, 18.37 and 24.5 Joules respectively. Subsequently, other laminates have been quasi-statically indented at with 0.05 mm/s cross-head speed, using the same indentor, until the maximum average displacement obtained during low velocity impact for each configuration and each energy was obtained. The results obtained show that strain rate has an effect on the performance of these laminates. In particular, the improved resistance to penetration appears to occur at the expense of damage dissipation due to vibrations. Quasi-static indentation does not appear to fully reproduce the effect of low velocity impact loading for these sandwich structures, showing significant differences in the hysteresis cycles, both during loading and during the damping phase, which need to be combined with the variable effect of damage on the laminates.

Keywords

Sandwich Laminates; Impact; Indentation; Hysteresis Cycles

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	L. S. Sutherland and C. Guedes Soares, “Contact Indenta- tion of Marine Composites,” Composite Structures, Vol. 70, No. 3, 2005, pp. 287-294. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.08.035
[2]	O. I. Benevolenski, J. Karger-Kocsis, K. P. Mieck and T. Reubmann, “Instrumented Perforation Impact Response of Polypropylene Composites with Hybrid Reinforcement Flax/Glass and Flax/Cellulose Fibers,” Journal of Ther- moplastic Composite Materials, Vol. 13, No. 6, 2000, pp. 481-496. doi:10.1106/2F7PQW-D06A-MYU6-8692
[3]	C. Santulli, “Study of Impact Hysteresis Curves on E- Glass Reinforced Polypropylene Laminates,” Journal of Materials Letters, Vol. 22 No. 22, 2003, pp. 1557-1562. doi:10.1023/A:1026315920448
[4]	C. Santulli and A. P. Caruso, “Effect of Fibre Architec- ture on the Falling Weight Impact Properties of Hemp/ Epoxy Composites,” Journal of Biobased Materials and Bioenergy, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2009, pp. 291-297. doi:10.1166/jbmb.2009.1037
[5]	S. H. Yang and C. T. Sun, “Indentation Law For Composite Laminates,” ASTM Standard and Engineering Di- gital Library 787, West Conshohocken, 1982, pp. 425- 449.
[6]	I. H. Choi and C. H. Lim, “Low-Velocity Impact Analysis of Composite Laminates Using Linearized Contact Law,” Composite Structures, Vol. 66, No. 1-4, 2004, pp. 125-132. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.030
[7]	G. Caprino and V. Lopresto, “The Significance of Indentation in the Inspection of Carbon Fibre-Reinforced Plastic Panels Damaged by Low-Velocity Impact,” Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 60, No. 7, 2000, pp. 1003-1012. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00196-7
[8]	S. H. Lee, Y. Aono, H. Noguchi and S. K. Cheong, “Damage Mechanism of Hybrid Composites with Nonwoven Carbon Tissue Subjected to Quasi-Static Indentation Loads,” Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 37, No. 4, 2003, pp. 333-349. doi:10.1177/0021998303037004334
[9]	G. Caprino and V. Lopresto, “On the Penetration Energy for Fibre-Reinforced Plastics under Low-Velocity Impact Conditions,” Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 61, No. 1, 2001, pp. 65-73. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00152-4
[10]	D. K. Rao, “Frequency and Loss Factors of Sandwich Beams under Various Boundary Conditions,” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, Vol. 20, No. 20, 1978, pp. 271-278.
[11]	J. P. Dear and S. A. Brown, “Impact Damage Processes in Reinforced Polymeric Materials,” Composites Part A, Vol. 34, No. 5, 2003, pp. 411-420. doi: 10.1016/S1359-835X(03)00082-4
[12]	H. N. Dhakal, Z. Y. Zhang, M. O. W. Richardson and O. A. Z. Errajhi, “The Low Velocity Impact Response of Non-Woven Hemp Fibre Reinforced Unsaturated Polyes- ter Composites,” Composite Structures, Vol. 81, No. 4, 2007, pp. 559-567. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.10.003
[13]	F. Xia and X. Q. Wu, “Work on Low-Velocity Impact Properties of Foam Sandwich Composites with Various Face Sheets,” Journal of Sandwich Structures and Mate- rials, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2010, pp. 47-62.
[14]	I. M. De Rosa, C. Santulli and F. Sarasini, “Characteriza- tion of Indentation Damage on Carbon/Epoxy Laminates by Means of Acoustic Emission and IR Thermography,” E-Journal of Non-Destructive Testing, Vol. 14, No. 5, 2009.
[15]	C. Santulli, R. Brooks, A. C. Long, N. A. Warrior and C. D. Rudd, “Influence of Materials Processing on Impact Properties of Compression-Moulded Commingled Ther- moplastic Composites,” Plastics, Rubber and Composites, Vol. 31, No. 6, 2002, pp. 270-277. doi:10.1179/146580102225004983
[16]	M. Biron, “Thermosets and Composites,” Technology & Engineering, Elsevier, New York, 2004, p. 410.
[17]	E. A. Flores-Johnson and Q. M. Li, “Experimental Study of the Indentation of Sandwich Panels with Carbon Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Face Sheets and Polymeric Foam Core,” Composites Part B, Vol. 42 No. 5, 2011, pp. 1212- 1219. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.02.013