Rare-Earth Doped GdVO4 by Sol-Gel Method: Structural and Luminescence Properties
D. Y. Medina-Velázquez1*, A. D. J. Morales-Ramírez2, A. A. Morales-Hernández1, B. Gonzalez1, L. Ramírez-García1, E. Garfías-García1, J. Oliva4, C. R. Garcia5, J. Reyes-Miranda1, M. A. Barron1, E. Osorio-de-la-Rosa6
1Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Azcapotzalco, Ciencias Básicas e Ingeniería, Reynosa, México.
2Instituto Politécnico Nacional, CIITEC IPN, Cerrada de CECATI S/N Col., México City, México.
3Instituto Politécnico Nacional, ESIQIE IPN, México City, México.
4CONACyT-División de Materiales Avanzados, Instituto Potosino de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica A. C., San Luis Potosí, México.
5Facultad de Ciencias Físico Matemáticas, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Edif. A Unidad Camporredondo, Saltillo, México.
6Comonfort Col. Del Bosque. C.P. 77019 Chetumal, Quintana Roo, México.6 CONACYT-Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Quintana Roo, Boulevard Bahía s/n esq. Ignacio, Chetumal, México.
DOI: 10.4236/wjet.2022.104058   PDF    HTML   XML   140 Downloads   608 Views  

Abstract

Rare earths have been extensively developed in recent years, however, new hosts allow high excitation and emission efficiency, in this sense, gadolinium vanadate has been extensively studied and in previous works it has been widely used in down conversion systems. Because of the strong absorption of the VO4 groups and efficient energy transfer from GdVO4 to lanthanide ions, in this work its up-conversion properties were studied when is co-doped with Yb3+, X3+ where X = Tm, Er and Ho. The powders synthesized presented a high crystallinity and a rounded morphology and exhibit a high luminescence when are excited with IR radiation.

Share and Cite:

Medina-Velázquez, D. , Morales-Ramírez, A. , Morales-Hernández, A. , Gonzalez, B. , Ramírez-García, L. , Garfías-García, E. , Oliva, J. , Garcia, C. , Reyes-Miranda, J. , Barron, M. and Osorio-de-la-Rosa, E. (2022) Rare-Earth Doped GdVO4 by Sol-Gel Method: Structural and Luminescence Properties. World Journal of Engineering and Technology, 10, 907-922. doi: 10.4236/wjet.2022.104058.

1. Introduction

Rare earths (RE) are widely studied due to their unique properties and applications in optoelectronic, antibacterial activity, and other fields [1].

LnVO4 orthovanates (Ln = Y, Gd, ..., Er) have been used for many years as optical materials: phosphors, luminescent probes, fiber laser hosts, etc. [2]. It has been observed that in orthovanadate crystal lattices, the excitation of rare earth ions takes place mainly due to the absorption of excitation light by VO 4 3 vanadate molecular groups [3].

Gadolinium vanadate (GdVO4) is a material with diverse applications as a nanoscopic material combining magnetic resonance contrast enhancement properties with luminescence properties and hydrogen peroxide sensing characteristics [4], donor in fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) in aqueous solution [5] and for multimodal imaging functionalities and its performance as a radionuclide carrier for targeted alpha therapy [6].

For the equal valence and similar ionic radii the Gd compounds can be doped with luminescent lanthanide ions. They can be efficiently excited with UV radiation because of the strong absorption of the VO4 groups and efficient energy transfer from GdVO4 to lanthanide ions. Therefore, GdVO4 is a used as a phosphor (doped with Eu3+, Dy3+, Sm3+), an upconverter (doped with Er3+/Yb3+, Ho3+/Yb3+, or Tm3+/Yb3+) and a laser (doped with Nd3+).

Several methods have been used to prepare undoped and RE-doped GdVO4. GdVO4:Eu3+ have been successfully synthesized via a facile solvothermal route, a urea hydrolysis method, a co-precipitation synthesis, as well as facile hydrothermal methods.

Ho3+/Yb3+ co-doped GdVO4 nanophosphors have been synthesized via a facile modified sol-gel Pechini method, theses samples were annealed at 900˚C for 4 h.

In the present work we show the results obtained to carry out the synthesis of luminescent powders of GdVO4:Yb3+ (Iterbium), X3+ [X = Tm (Thulium), Er (Erbium) and Ho (Holmium)].

As previously mentioned, rare earths are a group of elements that constitute a set of substances of interest with optoelectronic applications, that is, applications in the field of telecommunications.

The need of human beings to keep in constant and fast communication has led to the creation of different means to perform this action with good efficiency, from the sending of pigeons with messages to the creation of optical fiber.

The main function of optical fiber is to transmit light signals at different frequencies at high speed, thanks to the fact that it has a much lower degree of attenuation and interference. However, there are studies that show that at a certain distance the frequency of the transmitted light suffers a decrease in the signal, causing the message to take much longer to reach its destination, so it is necessary to solve this problem, and glasses doped with rare earths have shown satisfactory results.

2. Methodology

2.1. Materials

Gd2O3 (Gadolinium oxide, Sigma Aldrich, 99.9%), Iterbium nitrate (Yb[NO3]3, Sigma-Aldrich, 99.999%) and thulium oxide (Tm2O3, Sigma-Aldrich, 99.9%) were used as precursors. While ammonium metavanadate (NH4VO3, Sigma Aldrich, 99.9%) as well as erbium oxide (Er2O3, Sigma Aldrich, 99.99%) and holmium chloride (HoCl3, Sigma Aldrich, 99.9%) were used as matrix for the doping agents.

2.2. Equipment

· FTIR (Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy) and XRD (X-ray diffraction).

Infrared spectroscopy analysis by FTIR was performed using a Shimadzu IRTracer-100 spectrophotometer. The FTIR spectra were recorded in the energy range 400 - 4000 cm−1 and the attenuated total reflection (ATR) accessory. Attenuated total reflection (ATR).

· Photoluminescence characterization.

Spectra were obtained using a Princeton Instruments Acton Spectra Pro modular fluorometer equipped with a 75 W xenon lamp (Newport Oriel). It also has excitation (SP2300i) and emission (SP-2500i with a Hamamatsu R955 photomultiplier attached) monochromators.

· Structural and morphological characterization.

The diffractograms were obtained using a Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffraction Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffraction (XRD) equipment emitting Cu-Kα radiation (wavelength 1.5418 Å). XRD patterns were recorded in the 2θ range of 20˚ - 70˚ at a scan rate of 0.1˚/s.

Scanning electron microscopy scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was obtained with the FEI-ESEM QUANTA 250 equipment to observe the morphology of the glasses.

Finally, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used with a FEI-Titan 80 - 300 microscope and a power of 12 KV.

2.3. Preparation

The first step to obtain the metal salts was to convert the oxides to nitrates using nitric acid (HNO3 Sigma Aldrich, 70%) with a 1:1 volume ratio according to Kolesnikov [7]. The dissolved oxides were subjected to stirring for a time of 1 h at a temperature of 80˚C. When the solutions were still transparent, the resulting solution was allowed to cool to room temperature and then subjected to a drying process at a temperature of 100˚C for 24 h. Finally, to obtain gadolinium and erbium powders, heat treatment at a temperature of 200˚C for 20 minutes was necessary. The X-ray diffraction technique was used to corroborate the structure of the nitrates.

After the oxide was converted to nitrates, gadolinium nitrate at 1M, ytterbium nitrate at 3 atomic percent and holmium chloride at X atomic percent (X = 1, 3, 5) were dissolved in ethanol-water solution at 113 M with a ratio of 1:1 by stirring at a temperature of 60˚C for a time of 30 minutes. After that time, citric acid at 2.6 M as a chelating agent, ammonium metavanadate at 1.3 M as a precursor and ethylene glycol at 0.37 M as a stabilizer was added with constant stirring at a temperature of 80˚C for 1 h and at 800 rpm.

The sol was kept under stirring until the solution turned dark blue in color. The resulting solution was dried at a temperature of 100˚C for 24 h to remove excess water and alcohol. To promote crystallization of the powders, a thermal treatment (T.T.) was necessary at temperatures of 600˚C, 700˚C, 800˚C, 900˚C and 1000˚C for a time of 1 h. Table 1 shows the stoichiometric quantities of the elements used in the matrix with Yb and Table 2 enlisted the amounts in percentage of each of rare earths used in the experiment.

3. Results and Discussion

Formation, morphology and structure analysis.

3.1. FTIR and XRD

Once the coincidence of the crystalline phase of GdVO4 with the 17-0260 card was corroborated, X-ray diffraction was performed to obtain the diffractograms of each of the resulting powders of GdVO4:Yb3+, X3+ (X = Tm, Ho, Er) with heat

Table 1. Stoichiometric quantities of the elements used in the matrix with Yb.

Table 2. Synthesized systems of the Tm, Er, and Ho ions at different TT.

Figure 1. Diffractogram of the GdVO4 system: Yb3+, Tm3+ (1%, 3%, and 5% at.) at (a) 600˚C, (b) 700˚C, (c) 800˚C, (d) 900˚C, and (e) 1000˚C.

treatment of 600˚C, 700˚C, 800˚C, 900˚C and 1000˚C.

Figure 1 shows diffractograms of the system GdVO4:Yb3+, Tm3+ (1%, 3%, and 5% at.) at (a) 600˚C, (b) 700˚C, (c) 800˚C, (d) 900˚C, and (e) 1000˚C. From the results obtained, it is evident that the crystallite size is larger at 1% atm of Tm3+ up to 800˚C, once this temperature is exceeded, the crystallite size is larger at 3% atm of Tm3+; while the smallest crystallite was found to be in most cases 5% at. of Tm3+.

Figure 2 shows diffractograms of the system GdVO4:Yb3+, Er3+ (1%, 3%, and 5% at.) at (a) 600˚C, (b) 700˚C, (c) 800˚C, (d) 900˚C, and (e) 1000˚C. From the results obtained, it is evident that the crystallite size is larger at 1% at. of Tm3+ up to 800˚C, once this temperature is exceeded, the crystallite size is larger at 3% at.

Figure 2. Diffractogram of the GdVO4 system: Yb3+, Er3+ (1, 3, and 5% at.) at (a) 600˚C, (b) 700˚C, (c) 800˚C, (d) 900˚C, and (e) 1000˚C.

of Tm3+; while the smallest crystallite was found to be in most cases 5% at. of Tm3+. According to the results obtained, it is noticeable that the largest crystallite size is with 1% at. of Er3+; while the smallest crystallite turned out to be in most cases 5% at. of Er3+.

Figure 3 shows diffractograms of the system GdVO4:Yb3+, Ho3+ (1%, 3%, and 5% at.) at (a) 600˚C, (b) 700˚C, (c) 800˚C, (d) 900˚C, and (e) 1000˚C. According to

Figure 3. Diffractogram of the GdVO4 system: Yb3+, Ho3+ (1%, 3%, and 5% at.) at (a) 600˚C, (b) 700˚C, (c) 800˚C, (d) 900˚C, and (e) 1000˚C.

the results obtained, it is evident that the largest crystallite size belongs mostly to 1% at. of Ho3+; while the smallest crystallite turned out to be mostly 5% at. of Ho3+.

Finally the Table 3 shown the Diffractogram of the GdVO4 system: Yb3+, Ho3+ (1%, 3%, and 5% at.) at (a) 600˚C, (b) 700˚C, (c) 800˚C, (d) 900˚C, and (e) 1000˚C.

In where is shown that when the temperature increase the crystalline size also increased, for all the system presented

3.2. Photoluminescence Study

3.2.1. GdVO4 Luminescence Spectrometry of Yb3+ and Tm3+ at Different Temperatures

Figure 4 shows GdVO4 luminescence spectrometry of Yb3+ and Tm3+ at 800˚C. It

Table 3. Diffractogram of the GdVO4 system: Yb3+, Ho3+ (1%, 3%, and 5% at.) at (a) 600˚C, (b) 700˚C, (c) 800˚C, (d) 900˚C, and (e) 1000˚C.

Figure 4. GdVO4 luminescence spectrometry of Yb3+ and Tm3+ at 800˚C.

observes that the wavelength (X-axis) for both 3% and 1% of the maximum and minimum points are exactly the same for these percentages. But its absorbance does show changes, for 3% it has a maximum point of 525 AU and a minimum of 490 AU; while for 1% it has a maximum of 1400 AU and a minimum of 125 AU.

As a result, the highest spectrometry point belongs to 1% with values of 810 nm and 1400 AU.

· GdVO4 luminescence spectrometry of Yb3+ and Tm3+ at 1000˚C.

Considering Figure 5 and the data in Table 4, it is evident that for the 5% crystal at T = 1000˚C its luminescence just begins, with values of 806 nm and 300 AU; on the other hand, the crystal with 3% has a slightly larger wavelength (0.25 nm) compared to the other 2 percentages.

The crystal with 1% presents the largest luminescence peak, with values of 806 nm - 900 AU, for wavelength and absorbance respectively.

Finally concluding that luminescence spectrometry of GdVO4 from ytterbium

Figure 5. GdVO4 luminescence spectrometry of Yb3+ and Tm3+ at 1000˚C.

Table 4. Wavelength and absorption of the highest GdVO4 spots of Yb3+ and Tm3+ at 1000˚C.

(Yb3+) and thulium (Tm3+) has better results when the temperature is elevated, and the 1% crystal has the best luminescence peaks in both cases (T = 800˚C and T = 1000˚C).

3.2.2. GdVO4 Luminescence Spectrometry of Yb3+ and Ho3+ at Different Temperatures.

· GdVO4 luminescence spectrometry of Yb3+ and Ho3+ at 800˚C. According to Figure6 and Table 5, it was obtained:

*For the 5% crystal, its highest values were 803 nm and 510 AU.

*For the 3% crystal, its highest values were 807 nm and 760 AU.

*For the 1% crystal, its highest value for wavelength was 665 nm (corresponding to an absorbance of 1950); while its highest absorbance value was 2200 (corresponding to a wavelength of 665 nm).

Therefore, it is determined that the 1% crystal has better results in both wavelength and absorbance.

· GdVO4 luminescence spectrometry of Yb3+ and Ho3+ at 1000˚C.

Figure 6. GdVO4 luminescence spectrometry of Yb3+ and Ho3+ at 800˚C.

Table 5. Wavelength and absorption of the highest GdVO4 spots of Yb3+ and Ho3+ at 800˚C.

Figure 7 and Table 6 show that the lowest luminescence was presented by the 3% crystal, with an absorbance of 490 AU; while the 1% crystal has the highest absorbance with 3150 AU. As for the wavelength values for the 1%, 3% and 5% crystals, they all present their peaks at the same values, 665 nm for the highest peak and 652 nm for the second highest peak. The 1% crystal presents the largest luminescence peak, with values of 665 nm - 3150 AU, for wavelength and absorbance respectively.

It is concluded that GdVO4 luminescence spectrometry of Ytterbium (Yb3+) and Holmium (Ho3+) has better results when the temperature is elevated, and the 1% crystal has the best luminescence peaks in both cases (T = 800˚C and T = 1000˚C).

Figure 7. GdVO4 luminescence spectrometry of Yb3+ and Ho3+ at 1000˚C.

Table 6. Wavelength and absorption of the highest GdVO4 spots of Yb3+ and Ho3+ at 1000˚C.

3.2.3. GdVO4 Luminescence Spectrometry of Yb3+ and Er3+ at Different Temperatures

· GdVO4 luminescence spectrometry of Yb3+ and Er3+ at 800˚C.

With respect to Figure 8 and Table 7, the highest luminescence peak belongs to the 1% crystal, having a wavelength of 523 nm and an absorbance of 2800 AU, followed by the 3% crystal with the second highest luminescence peak with a wavelength of 523 nm and an absorbance of 2600 AU. It is evident that the luminescence results for the 5% crystal turned out to be minimal compared to the 3% and 5% crystals.

· GdVO4 luminescence spectrometry of Yb3+ and Er3+ at 1000˚C.

Looking at Figure 9 and Table 8, we notice that the two highest peaks in erbium luminescence at 1000˚C are for the 3% crystal, as it obtained absorbance results of 3050 AU with a wavelength of 523 nm, and the second one with an

Figure 8. GdVO4 luminescence spectrometry of Yb3+ and Er3+ at 800˚C.

Table 7. Wavelength and absorption of the highest GdVO4 spots of Yb3+ and Er3+ at 800˚C.

Figure 9. GdVO4 luminescence spectrometry of Yb3+ and Er3+ at 1000˚C.

Table 8. Wavelength and absorption of the highest GdVO4 spots of Yb3+ and Er3+ at 1000˚C.

absorbance of 2300 AU and a wavelength of 556 nm.

Undoubtedly, the 5% crystal continues to present the smallest peaks compared to the 1% and 5% crystals.

It can be concluded that a GdVO4 luminescence spectrometry of ytterbium (Yb3+) and Erbium (Er3+) has better results when the temperature is elevated, being the best option the 1% crystal at a temperature of 800˚C, and for a temperature of 1000˚C, the best option turned out to be the 3% crystal. While, in both cases, the 5% crystal presents the lowest luminescence.

3.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy

With the help of the JEOL microscope, scanning electron microscopy images were obtained to analyze the morphological evolution of the doped and undoped GdVO4 powders that were heat treated at 900˚C.

Figure 10 shows that the morphology of the GdVO4 particles corresponds to

Figure 10. Morphology of GdVO4 powders without rare earth, and with single and codoped rare earh at 900˚C heat treatment.

quasi-spherical particles, well densified and without any trace of porosity. In addition, it is shown that the particle size distribution is around 3 μm, although it is to be noted also, the presence of fibers of approximately 12 μm in length. Due to the heat treatment conditions (900˚C) of the particles begin to agglomerate and join together, causing a growth in particle size. Therefore, it is appreciated that there is not a closed distribution in the particle size, but rather, some of them are smaller than 3 μm in size.

Similarly, single-doped Scanning Electron Microscopy images were obtained with Erbium, Tullium and Iterbium and at 1% at., also presented in Figure 10. The images show a particle size distribution between 2 and 3 μm. From the above, it can be concluded that the concentration of dopant ions does not abruptly modify their morphology.

However, the presence of two dopants in the crystal structure of the GdVO4 matrix causes the particle size to decrease drastically but not abruptly to values of about 1 μm. Therefore, the dopants are believed to retard grain growth.

4. Conclusions

The obtaining of luminescent results with doping of Yb3+ represents an advance in the research developed of this rare earth since in other studies the percentage of dopant is around 30% at, if it is possible to reduce the percentage of doping and to raise the energy efficiency in the up-conversion systems it would represent an advance in the way of the optimization of rare earths.

The images obtained by SEM show that the GdVO4:Yb3+, X3+ (X = Tm, Er, Ho) systems are spherical and semi-spherical, this is mainly due to the sol-gel process and the thermal treatment used, the spheres in the powders are spherical and semi-spherical. XRD and Spectroscopy results guarantee the formation of the proposed system, the synthesis method produced gadolinium vanadate, the FTIR showed the vibrations of the molecules and the spectroscopy result points out the influence of dopants on the system.

The results obtained confirmed a highly luminescent efficiency in up conversion, for the ions studied in this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Ayachi, F., Saidi, K., Chaabani, W. and Dammak, M. (2021) Synthesis and Lumi-nescence Properties of Er3+ Doped and Er3+ – Yb3+ Codoped Phosphovanadate YP0.5V0.5O4 Phosphors. Journal of Luminescence, 240, 118451.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2021.118451
[2] Bharat, L.K., Nagaraju, G., Hussain, S.K. and Yu, J.S. (2018) Sol-Gel Derived Barium Orthovanadate Phosphors for White Light-Emitting Diodes. Dyes and Pigments, 150, 44-48.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2017.11.006
[3] Chukova, O., Nedilko, S.A., et al. (2022) Strong Europium Luminescence in Lanthan-Euripium-Erbium-Calcium-Vanadate Nanocrystals, the Result of Codoping Optimization. arXiv: 2202.02376.
[4] Abdesselem, M., Schoeffel, M., et al. (2014) Multifunctional Rare-Earth Vanadate Nanoparticles: Luminescent Labels, Oxidant Sensors, and MRI Contrast Agents. ACS Nano, 8, 11126-11137.
https://doi.org/10.1021/nn504170x
[5] Yefimova, S.L., Tkacheva, T.N., et al. (2017) GdVO4:Eu3+ Nanoparticles-Methylene Blue Complexes for PDT: Electronic Excitation Energy Transfer Study. Journal of Luminescence, 192, 975-981.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2017.08.044
[6] Toro-González, M., Copping, R., Mirzadeh, S. and Rojas, J.V. (2018) Multifunctional GdVO4:Eu Core-Shell Nanoparticles Containing 225Ac for Targeted Alpha Therapy and Molecular Imaging. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 6, 7985-7997.
https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TB02173B
[7] Kolesnikov, I.E., Tolstikova, D.V., et al. (2015) Concentration Effect on Structural and Luminescent Properties of YVO4:Nd3+ Nanophosphors. Materials Research Bulletin, 70, 799-803.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2015.06.023

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.