Psychophysical Neuroeconomics of Decision Making: Nonlinear Time Perception Commonly Explains Anomalies in Temporal and Probability Discounting

Journals Menu

Follow SCIRP

ISSN Print: 2152-7385
ISSN Online: 2152-7393
www.scirp.org/journal/am
E-mail: am@scirp.org

"Psychophysical Neuroeconomics of Decision Making: Nonlinear Time Perception Commonly Explains Anomalies in Temporal and Probability Discounting"
written by Taiki Takahashi, Ruokang Han,
published by Applied Mathematics, Vol.4 No.11, 2013

has been cited by the following article(s):

[1]	Delay discounting and risky choice: Meta-analytic evidence regarding single-process theories
	2020

[2]	Individual differences in time estimation are associated with delay discounting and alcohol use
	2020

[3]	Delay discounting and risky choice: Meta-analytic evidence regarding single-process theories.
	2020

[4]	Essays in Experimental Economics
	2019

[5]	Decision making generalized by a cumulative probability weighting function
	Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2018

[6]	How Time Flies!
	2018

[7]	Can quantum approaches benefit biology of decision making?
	Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 2017

[8]	Loss of Self-Control in Intertemporal Choice May Be Attributable to Logarithmic Time-Perception
	Behavioral Economics of Preferences, Choices, and Happiness, 2016

[9]	Discounting Delayed and Probabilistic Monetary Gains and Losses by Smokers of Cigarettes
	Behavioral Economics of Preferences, Choices, and Happiness, 2016

[10]	Pharmacological and expectancy effects of a low amount of alcohol drinking on outcome valuation and risk perception in males and females
	PLOS ONE, 2016

[11]	New Developments in Neuroeconomics
	Organizational Science, 2014

[12]	ニューロエコノミックスの新展開
	組織科学, 2014

[13]	The Q-Exponential Decay of Subjective Probability for Future Reward: A Psychophysical Time Approach
	Entropy, 2014

[1]	Individual differences in time estimation are associated with delay discounting and alcohol use Current Psychology, 2022 DOI:10.1007/s12144-020-00899-7

[2]	Delay discounting and risky choice: Meta-analytic evidence regarding single-process theories Judgment and Decision Making, 2020 DOI:10.1017/S193029750000718X

[3]	Decision making generalized by a cumulative probability weighting function Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2018 DOI:10.1016/j.physa.2017.08.022

[4]	How Time Flies! SSRN Electronic Journal , 2018 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3285834

[5]	Can quantum approaches benefit biology of decision making? Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 2017 DOI:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.06.002

[6]	Pharmacological and Expectancy Effects of a Low Amount of Alcohol Drinking on Outcome Valuation and Risk Perception in Males and Females PLOS ONE, 2016 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0154083

[7]	Behavioral Economics of Preferences, Choices, and Happiness 2016 DOI:10.1007/978-4-431-55402-8_5

[8]	Behavioral Economics of Preferences, Choices, and Happiness 2016 DOI:10.1007/978-4-431-55402-8_8

[9]	Behavioral Economics of Preferences, Choices, and Happiness 2016 DOI:10.1007/978-4-431-55402-8_5

[10]	Behavioral Economics of Preferences, Choices, and Happiness 2016 DOI:10.1007/978-4-431-55402-8_8

[11]	The Q-Exponential Decay of Subjective Probability for Future Reward: A Psychophysical Time Approach Entropy, 2014 DOI:10.3390/e16105537

Follow SCIRP