Theoretical Economics Letters

Theoretical Economics Letters

ISSN Print: 2162-2078
ISSN Online: 2162-2086
www.scirp.org/journal/tel
E-mail: tel@scirp.org
"Eliciting Probabilities, Means, Medians, Variances and Covariances without Assuming Risk Neutrality"
written by Karl H. Schlag, Joël J. van der Weele,
published by Theoretical Economics Letters, Vol.3 No.1, 2013
has been cited by the following article(s):
  • Google Scholar
  • CrossRef
[1] Self-persuasion: Evidence from field experiments at international debating competitions
American Economic …, 2022
[2] Second-order beliefs and gender
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2022
[3] Belief identification with state-dependent utilities
arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.10505, 2022
[4] Recovering Subjective Probability Distributions: A Bayesian Approach
2022
[5] Experimental methods: Eliciting beliefs
Journal of Economic Behavior & …, 2021
[6] Fishing for good news: Motivated information acquisition
2021
[7] Motivated Beliefs about Stock Returns
Ormaetxe - Available at SSRN 3905142, 2021
[8] Field and Lab Experiments in Beliefs
2021
[9] Motivated Information Acquisition
2021
[10] Belief elicitation with multiple point predictions
2021
[11] The Binary Lottery Procedure does not induce risk neutrality in the Holt & Laury and Eckel & Grossman tasks
2021
[12] Beliefs, learning, and personality in the indefinitely repeated prisoner's dilemma
2020
[13] Incentive-Compatible Surveys via Posterior Probabilities
2020
[14] Overconfidence in Labor Markets
2020
[15] Central tendency bias in belief elicitation
2020
[16] Replication: Belief Elicitation with Quadratic and Binarized Scoring Rules
2020
[17] К вопросу о стимульно-согласованных исследованиях с использованием апостериорных вероятностей
2020
[18] Belief Elicitation When More Than Money Matters: Controlling for" Control"
2020
[19] Belief Elicitation When More Than Money Matters: Controlling for “Control”.
2020
[20] Belief formation and prosocial behavior
2020
[21] 经济学实验中的信念诱导与测度: 理论, 方法与应用
2020
[22] The Binary Lottery Procedure does not induce risk neutrality in the Holt-Laury and Eckel-Grossman tasks
2019
[23] Belief elicitation when more than money matters
2019
[24] Looking at the bright side: The motivational value of confidence
2019
[25] Markets Assessing Decision Makers and Decision Makers Impressing Markets: a Lab Experiment
2019
[26] Self-Persuasion: Evidence from Field Experiments at Two International Debating Competitions
2019
[27] Experimental Study on Communication and the Opportunity Cost of Delegation
2019
[28] Belief-Formation in Games of Initial Play: an Experimental Investigation
2019
[29] Looking at the bright side: The motivation value of overconfidence
2018
[30] On proper scoring rules and cumulative prospect theory
EURO Journal on Decision Processes, 2018
[31] On the Road to Making Science of “Art”: Risk Bias in Market Scoring Rules
2018
[32] Robust scoring rules
2018
[33] Committees of Experts in the Lab
2018
[34] Judicial Effort and the Appeals System: Theory and Experiment
2018
[35] Eliciting prior beliefs
2018
[36] The impact of fine size and uncertainty on punishment and deterrence: Theory and evidence from the laboratory
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2018
[37] Intention-based reciprocity and signaling of intentions
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2017
[38] Essays in Corporate Prediction Markets
2017
[39] An Experimental Study on Sequential Auctions with Privately Known Capacities
University Ca' Foscari of Venice, Dept. of Economics Research Paper Series, 2017
[40] Watch your Words: an Experimental Study on Communication and the Opportunity Cost of Delegation
Working Paper, 2017
[41] Gender, performance estimation and self-selection to tasks: Evidence from the laboratory
Dissertation, 2017
[42] Gender, self-selection and moral hazard in teams
2017
[43] Gender, performance estimation and self-selection to tasks–Evidence from the laboratory
2017
[44] Information and the Quality of Decision Making
2016
[45] A Note on Sandroni-Shmaya Belief Elicitation Mechanism
2016
[46] Justice under uncertainty
2016
[47] Essays in information elicitation and market design
2016
[48] How is Information Valued? Evidence from Framed Field Experiments
The Economic Journal, 2016
[49] Belief Elicitation with a Synchronized Lottery Choice Menu That Is Invariant to Risk Attitudes
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2016
[50] Overcoming Coordination Failure in a Critical Mass Game: Strategic Motives and Action Disclosure
AMSE Working Papers, 2016
[51] Measuring Responsiveness to Feedback as a Personal Trait
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, 2016
[52] A DUAL CHARACTERIZATION OF OPTIMAL BEHAVIOR FOR SCORING RULES
2016
[53] Screening Agents in Belief Eliciting Mechanisms
2016
[54] An Overview of Applications of Proper Scoring Rules
2016
[55] A method to elicit beliefs as most likely intervals
Judgment and Decision Making, 2015
[56] Judicial effort and the appeal system: theory and experiment
2015
[57] Trust, values, and false consensus
International Economic Review, 2015
[58] A penny for your thoughts: A survey of methods for eliciting beliefs
Experimental Economics, 2015
[59] Essays on the Economics of Organizations, Productivity and Labor
2015
[60] Feedback manipulation and learning in games
2015
[61] The Demand for Information and Individual Consistency in Belief Updating
2015
[62] A method to elicit beliefs as most likely intervals.
2015
[63] Managing self-confidence
2014
[64] Belief updating and the demand for information
SSRN, 2014
[65] Eliciting subjective probabilities with binary lotteries
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.Elsevier, 2014
[66] Belief Elicitation in the Laboratory
Annual Review of Economics, 2014
[67] Preferences and beliefs in a sequential social dilemma: A within-subjects analysis
Games and Economic Behavior.Elsevier, 2014
[68] Minimum Truth Serums with Optional Predictions
2014
[69] Inequality and relative ability beliefs
The Economic Journal, 2014
[70] Belief Elicitation in the Lab
Annual Review of Economics, 2013
[71] Eliciting beliefs: Proper scoring rules, incentives, stakes and hedging
European Economic Review, 2013
[72] The binarized scoring rule
2013
[73] A mechanism for eliciting the mean and quantiles of a random variable
Economics Letters.Elsevier, 2013
[74] Incentives for eliciting confidence intervals
Available at SSRN 2271061, 2013
[75] How is information (under-) valued? evidence from framed field experiments
SSRN, 2013
[76] Eliciting beliefs by paying in chance
Economic Theory Bulletin, 2013
[77] We should totally open a restaurant: performance uncertainty and optimistic beliefs
2013
[78] IEF
2013
Free SCIRP Newsletters
Copyright © 2006-2024 Scientific Research Publishing Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Top