M&A Due Diligence in China—Institutional Framework, Corporate Practice and Empirical Evidence

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 725KB)  PP. 998-1029  
DOI: 10.4236/ajibm.2017.78072    2,076 Downloads   4,698 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Western companies have established rigorous and robust processes to evaluate a target enterprise before its legal acquisition. This should allow the risks to be mitigated by adjusting purchase price or representations & warranties. In China, however, investors experience that conducting such M&A due diligence might be less effective. Based on neo-institutional economics, experience from corporate practice and empirical evidence, our paper explains the limitations of the approach. Our research concludes that following Western best-practice procedures does not necessarily reduce the uncertainty of an investor in China. Likewise, experts in China do not fully recognize typical M&A measures and indicators as informational substitutes (e.g. contractual terms like earn-out-agreements). Due to different cultural and institutional framework conditions, it takes further activities to overcome the asymmetric information between investor and seller.

Share and Cite:

Büttner, L. and Meckl, R. (2017) M&A Due Diligence in China—Institutional Framework, Corporate Practice and Empirical Evidence. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 7, 998-1029. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2017.78072.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.