Author(s)

Kosj Yamoah, Nicholas G. Zaorsky, Joshua Siglin, Wenyin Shi, Maria Werner-Wasik, David W. Andrews, Adam P. Dicker, Voichita Bar-Ad, Haisong Liu

Department of Neurological Surgery, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Jefferson Medical College and Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Jefferson Medical College and Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA.

Purpose: To determine the precision of our institution’s current immobilization devices for spine SBRT, ultimately leading to recommendations for appropriate planning margins. Methods: We identified 12 patients (25 treatments) with spinal metastasis treated with spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT). The Body-FIX system was used as immobilization device for thoracic (T) and lumbar (L) spine lesions. The head and shoulder mask system was used as immobilization device for cervical (C) spine lesions. Initial patient setup used the infrared positioning system with body markers. Stereotactic X-ray imaging was then performed and correction was made if the initial setup error exceeded predetermined institutional tolerances, 1.5 mm for translation and 2° for rotation. Three additional sets of verification X-rays were obtained pre-, mid-, and post-treatment for all treatments. Results: Intrafraction motion regardless of immobilization technique was found to be 1.28 ± 0.57 mm. The mean and standard deviation of the variances along each direction were as follows: Superior-inferior, 0.56 ± 0.39 mm and 0.77 ± 0.52 mm, (p = 0.25); Anterior-posterior, 0.57 ± 0.43 mm and 1.14 ± 0.61 mm, (p = 0.01); Left-right, 0.48 ± 0.34 mm and 0.74 ± 0.40 mm, (p = 0.09) respectively. There was a significantly greater difference in the average 3D variance of the BodyFIX as compared to the head and shoulder mask immobilization system, 1.04 ± 0.46 mm and 1.71 ± 0.52 mm; (p = 0.003) respectively. Conclusions: Overall, our institution’s image guidance system using stereotactic X-ray imaging verification provides acceptable localization accuracy as previously defined in the literature. We observed a greater intrafraction motion for the head and shoulder mask as compared with the BodyFIX immobilization system, which may be a result of greater C-spine mobility and/or the suboptimal mask immobilization. Thus, better immobilization techniques for C-spine SBRT are needed to reduce setup error and intrafraction motion. We are currently exploring alternative C-spine immobilization techniques to improve set up accuracy and decrease intrafraction motion during treatment.

Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy; Immobilization; Intrafraction Motion

K. Yamoah, N. Zaorsky, J. Siglin, W. Shi, M. Werner-Wasik, D. Andrews, A. Dicker, V. Bar-Ad and H. Liu, "Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Residual Setup Errors and Intra-Fraction Motion Using the Stereotactic X-Ray Image Guidance Verification System," International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology, Vol. 3 No. 1, 2014, pp. 1-8. doi: 10.4236/ijmpcero.2014.31001.