Author(s)

Huan Huang, Hualin Liu, Hong Luo, Hao Du, Yi Xing, Yexu Li, Farid P. Dawalibi, Haijun Zhou, Longhai Fu

Guizhou Electric Power Test & Research Institute, Guiyang, China.
Safe Engineering Services & technologies ltd, Blvd. Des Oiseaux, Laval, Québec, Canada.

This paper examines various aspects of the design process and subsequent field test measurements of a large and complex substation grounding system. The study and measurements show that soil layering and lead interference can have a significant impact on the appropriate test location that yields the exact substation ground impedance. Applying a specific percentage rule such as the 61.8% rule for uniform soils to obtain the true ground impedance may lead to unacceptable errors for large grounding systems. This poses significant problems when attempting to validate a design based on raw test data that are interpreted using approximate methods to evaluate substation ground impedance, and determine ground potential rise (GPR), touch and step voltages. Advanced measurement methodologies and modern software packages were used to obtain and effectively analyze fall of potential test data, compute fault current distribution, and evaluate touch and step voltages for this large substation. Fault current distribution between the grounding system and other metallic paths were computed to determine the portion of fault current discharged in the grounding system. The performance of the grounding system, including its GPR and touch and step voltages, has been accurately computed and measured, taking into account the impedance of the steel material used of the ground conductors and circulating currents within the substation grounding system.

Ground Resistance; Fall-of-Potential; Ground Impedance Measurement; Ground Potential Rise; Ground Potential Difference; Touch Voltage; Step Voltage; Steel Conductors

H. Huang, H. Liu, H. Luo, H. Du, Y. Xing, Y. Li, F. P. Dawalibi, H. Zhou and L. Fu, "Analysis of a Large Grounding System and Subsequent Field Test Validation Using the Fall of Potential Method," Energy and Power Engineering, Vol. 5 No. 4B, 2013, pp. 1266-1272. doi: 10.4236/epe.2013.54B240.