What’s Wrong with Requirements Specification? An Analysis of the Fundamental Failings of Conventional Thinking about Software Requirements, and Some Suggestions for Getting it Right

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 460KB)  PP. 827-838  
DOI: 10.4236/jsea.2010.39096    6,840 Downloads   13,271 Views  Citations
Author(s)

Affiliation(s)

.

ABSTRACT

We know many of our IT projects fail and disappoint. The poor state of requirements methods and practice is frequently stated as a factor for IT project failure. In this paper, I discuss what I believe is the fundamental cause: we think like programmers, not engineers and managers. We do not concentrate on value delivery, but instead on functions, on use-cases and on code delivery. Further, management is not taking its responsibility to make things better. In this paper, ten practical key principles are proposed, which aim to improve the quality of requirements specification.

Share and Cite:

T. Gilb, "What’s Wrong with Requirements Specification? An Analysis of the Fundamental Failings of Conventional Thinking about Software Requirements, and Some Suggestions for Getting it Right," Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, Vol. 3 No. 9, 2010, pp. 827-838. doi: 10.4236/jsea.2010.39096.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.