Direct Mechanisms, Menus and Latent Contracts

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 291KB)  PP. 51-58  
DOI: 10.4236/me.2010.11005    2,993 Downloads   6,082 Views  Citations
Author(s)

Affiliation(s)

.

ABSTRACT

In common agency games, one cannot characterize all equilibria by considering only direct mechanisms. In an attempt to overcome this difficulty, Peters [1] and Martimort and Stole [2] identi?ed a class of indirect mechanisms (namely, menus) which are able to characterize every equilibrium. Unfortunately, menus are difficult to handle, and several methodologies have been proposed in the literature. Here, it is shown that, even if authors consider menus rather than simpler mechanisms, many equilibria described in the literature could have been characterized by direct incentive compatible mechanisms. Use of more sophisticated mechanisms was not necessary in these cases.

Share and Cite:

G. Piaser, "Direct Mechanisms, Menus and Latent Contracts," Modern Economy, Vol. 1 No. 1, 2010, pp. 51-58. doi: 10.4236/me.2010.11005.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.