The Freedom of Navigation in the South China Sea: An Ideal or a Reality?
Zewei Yang
Law School, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China..
DOI: 10.4236/blr.2012.33019   PDF    HTML     6,000 Downloads   11,314 Views   Citations

Abstract

The freedom of navigation in the South China Sea has drawn an extensive international concern in recent years. The main reasons leading to skepticism are the disputes in the South China Sea over islands sovereignty and maritime delimitation, extra-regional state’s intervention, and some ASEAN member states’ wish to countervail China with the help of extra-regional states. In fact there is no problem at all with the freedom of navigation in the South China Sea: on one hand, there are legal regimes to ensure all states’ freedom of navigation in different seas according to United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; on the other hand, no state impedes the freedom of navigation in the South China Sea. Currently, factors actually affecting the safety of navigation in the South China Sea include piracy, maritime ter- rorism and so on. Relevant states must take confidence-building measures as well as regional and bilateral cooperation so as to promote the safety of navigation in the region

Share and Cite:

Z. Yang, "The Freedom of Navigation in the South China Sea: An Ideal or a Reality?," Beijing Law Review, Vol. 3 No. 3, 2012, pp. 137-144. doi: 10.4236/blr.2012.33019.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] D. Rosenberg, Ed., “South China Sea WWW Virtual Library,” 2012. http://www.southchinasea.org/index.html
[2] R. W. Smith, “Maritime Delimitation in the South China Sea: Potentiality and Challenges,” Ocean Development & International Law, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2010, pp. 214-236. doi:10.1080/00908320.2010.499315
[3] C. Schofield and I. Storey, “The South China Sea Dispute Increasing Stakes and Rising Tensions,” The Jamestown Foundation, Washington DC, 2009.
[4] K. Y. Zou, “The Chinese Traditional Maritime Boundary Line in the South China Sea and Its Legal Consequences for the Resolution of the Dispute over the Spratly Islands,” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1999, pp. 27-55.
[5] J. M. Shen, “International Law Rules and Historical Evidences Supporting China’s Title to the South China Sea Islands,” Hastings International & Comparative Law Review, Vol. 21, 1997-1998, pp. 1-75.
[6] J. M. Shen, “China’s Sovereignty over the South China Sea Islands: A Historical Perspective,” Chinese Journal of International Law, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2002, pp. 94-157. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cjilaw.a000432
[7] C. Schofield, “Dangerous Ground,” In: S. Bateman and R. Emmers, Eds., Security and Politics in the South China Sea, Routledge, London, 2009, pp. 7-25.
[8] R. Beckman, “China, UNCLOS and the South China Sea”, Asian Society of International Law Third Biennial Conference, Beijing, 27-28 August 2011, 32 pp.
[9] Y.-H. Song, “The Overall Situation in the South China Sea in the New Millennium: Before and After the September 11 Terrorist Attacks,” Ocean Development & International Law, Vol. 34, No. 3-4, pp. 229-277.
[10] “Maritime Issues and Sovereignty Disputes in East Asia,” Testimony of Deputy Assistant Secretary Scot Marciel Bureau of East Asian & Pacific Affairs U. S. Department of State before the Subcommittee on East Asian and Pacific Affairs Committee on Foreign Relations United States Senate, 2009. http://vietnam.usembassy.gov/uploads/images/3VC0_Hwh5_paP5TLrjbLNg/MarcielTestimony090715p.pdf
[11] I. Storey, “Shangri-La Dialogue Highlights Tensions in Sino-U.S. Relations,” China Brief, Vol. 10, No. 13, 24 June 2010. http://www.jamestown.org/programs/chinabrief/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=36532&cHash=cbac584235
[12] R. Sutter, “United States and China: Will Positive Relations Endure?” East Asia Forum, 13 September 2010. http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2010/09/13/united-states-and-china-will-positive-relations-endure/
[13] R. A. Cossa, “A Pacific Forum CSIC Special Report: Security Implications of Conflict in the South China Sea: Exploring Potential Triggers of Conflict,” 2012. http://www.csic.org/pacfor/opSChinasea.pdf
[14] Financial Times, 30 October 2011. http://www.ft.com/intl/world/asiapacific/china
[15] Z. M. Zheng, “The Influence of Great States in the South China Sea Issue—U. S., Japan, India, Russia and the South China Sea Issue,” World Affairs Press, Beijing, 2010, p. 153.
[16] F. G. Liu and S. C. Wu, Eds., “Report on Situation of the South China Sea Region in 2010,” The Centre of International Relations of Taiwan National Politics University, Taipei, 2011, p. 45.
[17] Z. M. Liu, “The Basic Position of China on the Settlement of Maritime Disputes through Negotiations,” China Oceans Law Review, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2005, p. 21.
[18] Statement of the Spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China Chen Jian, “News Briefing by Chinese Foreign Ministry,” Beijing Review, 8-14 May 1995, p. 22.
[19] China News, 2011. http://www.chinanews.com.cn/gi/2010/07-26/2423966.shtml
[20] “China’s Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Hong Lei’s Regular Press Conference on September 29, 2011,” 2011. http://www.mfa.gov.cn/chn/gxh/tyb/fyrbt/jzhsl/t863756.htm
[21] D. H. Paal, “Beware the South China Sea,” The Diplomat, 15 July 2011. http://the-diplomat.com/2011/07/15/beware-the-south-china-sea/2/
[22] EEZ Group 21, “Guidelines for Navigation and Overflight in the Exclusive Economic Zone,” Ocean Policy Research Foundation, Tokyo, 2005, pp. 7-9. http://www.sof.or.jp/en/report/index.php#0509
[23] R. C. Beckman, “Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Southeast Asia: The Way Forward,” Ocean Development & International Law, Vol. 33, No. 3-4, 2002, pp. 317-341. doi:10.1080/00908320290054800
[24] C. Liss, “Maritime Piracy in Southeast Asia,” Southeast Asia Affairs 2003, Vol. 2003, 2003, pp. 52-68.
[25] J. M. Li, “The Safety in the South China Sea: Combating against Piracy and Anti-terror Cooperation,” Southeast Asian Affairs, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2008, p. 11.
[26] International Maritime Bureau, “Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships Report—Annual Report 2008,” 2008, pp. 5-12.
[27] B. Bingley, “Security Interests of the Influencing States: The Complexity of Malacca Straits,” The Indonesian Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2004, pp. 353-383.
[28] A. Tan, “The Persistence of Armed Muslim Rebellion in Southeast Asia: Implications after September 11,” In: D. M. Jones, Ed., Globalization and the New Terror: The Asia Pacific Dimension, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, Northampton, 2004, p. 213.
[29] P. H. Cai, “On the Cooperation Mechanism of the Sea Safety in the South China Sea,” Contemporary International Relations, Vol. 26, No. 6, 2006, p. 7.
[30] R. C. Beckman, “Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Southeast Asia: The Way Forward,” Ocean Development & International Law, Vol. 33, No. 3-4, 2002, pp. 317-341. doi:10.1080/00908320290054800
[31] J. H. Ho, “The Security of Sea Lanes in Southeast Asia,” Asian Survey, Vol. 46, No. 4, 2006, pp. 558-574. doi:10.1525/as.2006.46.4.558
[32] J. Zhang, “The Situation of the Safety of Navigation in the South China Sea and China’s Response,” Journal of the Yinchuan Municipal Party College of C. P. C., Vol. 10, No. 3, 2010, p. 42.
[33] The Washington Times, 5 January 1999.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.