Effects of planting dates, densities, and varieties on ecophysiology of pigeonpea in the Southeastern United States

Abstract

Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] is an important legume crop widely cultivated in tropical and subtropical climates of the world. Interest in this crop is growing in many countries because of its multiple uses as a source of food, feed, fuel, and fertilizer. However, the performance of pigeonpea in Southeastern US has not been well investigated. We conducted an experiment in Nashville, Tennessee to test the effects of two planting dates, three densities, and four varieties on pigeonpea ecophysiology that included leaf photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, transpiration, water use efficiency (WUE), leaf area index (LAI) and soil respiration. Results indicated that the plants in the late planting plots had higher photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration. There were significant differences in the levels of leaf photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, transpiration, WUE and LAI among all four varieties. W3 and G1 showed higher photosynthetic rate and LAI than W1, and W3 had higher WUE than G2 and W1. Planting densities had no significant effect on all variables studied. This study indicated that late planting of variety G1 or W3 resulted in higher WUE and yield, but did no significant influence soil CO2 emission.

Share and Cite:

Wilson, C. , Hui, D. , Nwaneri, E. , Wang, J. , Deng, Q. , Duseja, D. and Tegegne, F. (2012) Effects of planting dates, densities, and varieties on ecophysiology of pigeonpea in the Southeastern United States. Agricultural Sciences, 3, 147-152. doi: 10.4236/as.2012.32017.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Ae, N., Arihara, J., Okada, K., Yoshihara, T. and Johansen, C. (1990) Phosphorus uptake by pigeon pea and its role in cropping systems of the Indian subcontinent. Science, 248, 477-480. doi:10.1126/science.248.4954.477
[2] Rao, S.C., Phillips, W.A., Mayeux, H.S. and Phatak, S.C. (2003) Potential grain and forage production of early maturing pigeonpea in the southern Great Plains. Crop Science, 43, 2212-2217. doi:10.2135/cropsci2003.2212
[3] Raju, N.L., Gnanesh, B.N., Lekha, P., et al. (2010) The first set of EST resource for gene discovery and marker development in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.). BMC Plant Biology, 10, 45. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-10-45
[4] Varshney, R.K., Chen, W., Li, Y., Bharti, A.K., Saxena, R.K., Schlueter, J.A., Donoghue, M.T.A., Azam, S., et al. (2011) Draft genome sequence of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan), an orphan legume crop of resource-poor farmers. Nature Biotechnology, 30, 83-89. doi:10.1038/nbt.2022
[5] Vanaja, M., Reddy, P.R., Lakshmi, N.J., Razak, S.K., Vagheera, P., Archana, G., Yadav, S.K., Maheswari, M. and Venkateswarlu, B. (2010) Response of seed yield and its components of red gram (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.) to elevated CO2. Plant, Soil and Environment, 56, 458-462.
[6] Nene, Y.L. and Sheila, V.K. (1990) Pigeonpea: Geography and importance. In: Nene, Y.L. et al. Eds., The Pigeonpea. CAB International, University Club, Cambridge, 1-14.
[7] Lopez, F.B., Chauhan, Y.S. and Johansen, C. (1997) Effects of timing of drought stress on leaf area development and canopy light interception on short-duration pigeonpea. Journal of Agronomic Crop Science, 178, 1-7. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037X.1997.tb00344.x
[8] Odeny, D.A. (2007) The potential of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) in Africa. Natural Resources Forum, 31, 297-305. doi:10.1111/j.1477-8947.2007.00157.x
[9] Salunkhe, D.K., Chavan, J.K. and Kadam, S.S. (1986) Pigeon pea as important food source. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 23, 103-141. doi:10.1080/10408398609527422
[10] Singh, U., Jambunathan, R., Saxena, K.B. and Subrahmanyam, N. (1990) Nutritional quality evaluation of newly developed high-protein genotypes of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 50, 201-209. doi:10.1002/jsfa.2740500208
[11] Rao, S.C., Coleman, S.W. and Mayeux, H.S. (2002) Forage production and nutritive value of selected pigeonpea ecotypes in southern Great Plains. Crop Science, 42, 1259-1263. doi:10.2135/cropsci2002.1259
[12] Egbe, O.M. and Kalu, B.A. (2009) Evaluation of pigeon-pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) genotypes for intercropping with tall sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) in southern Guinea Savanna of Nigeria. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 4.
[13] Lucier, G., Lin, B.-H., Allshouse, J. and Kantor, L.S. (2000) Factors affecting dry bean consumption in the United States. USDA Economic Research Service: Vegetables and Specialties, Washington DC, 26-34.
[14] Rao, A.S., Luthra, Y.P., Sheoran, I.S. and Singh, R. (1984) Partitioning of carbon and nitrogen during growth and development of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.). Journal of Experimental Botany, 35, 774-784. doi:10.1093/jxb/35.6.774
[15] Fujita, K., Kai, Y., Takayanagi, M., El-Shemy, H., Adu-Gyamfi, J.J. and Mohapatra, P.K. (2004) Genotypic variability of pigeonpea in distribution of photosynthetic carbon at low phosphorus level. Plant Science, 166, 641-649. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.10.032
[16] Faroda, A.S. and Johri, J.N. (1981) Extending pigeonpea cultivation to nontraditional areas in India. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Pigeonpeas, Vol. 1, 15-19 December 1980, Patancheru, 45-50.
[17] Phatak, S.C., Nadimpalli, R.G., Tiwari, S.C. and Bhardwaj, H.L. (1993) Pigeonpeas: Potential new crop for the southeastern United States. In: Janick J. and Simon, J.E. Eds., New crops. Wiley, New York, 597-599.
[18] Scokstad, E. (2007) The plant breeder and the pea. Science, 316, 196-197. doi:10.1126/science.316.5822.196
[19] Rao, S.C. and Northup, B.K. (2009) Capabilities of four novel warm-season legumes in the Southern Great Plains: Biomass and forage quality. Crop Science, 49, 1096-1102. doi:10.2135/cropsci2008.08.0499
[20] Foster, J.L., Adesogan, A.T., Carter, J.N., Sollenberger, L.E., Blount, A.R., Myer, R.O., Phatak, S.C. and Maddox, M.K. (2009) Annual legumes for forage systems in the United States Gulf Coast Regioin. Agronomy Journal, 101, 415-421. doi:10.2134/agronj2008.0083x
[21] Bhardwaj, H.L., Rangappa, M. and Hamama, A.A. (1999) Chickpea, faba bean, lupin, mungbean, and pigeonpea: potential new crops for the Mid-Atlantic Region of the United States. In: Janick, J. Ed., Perspectives on New Crops and New Uses. ASHS Press, Alexandria, 202-205.
[22] NOAA National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office (2011). http://www.srh.noaa.gov
[23] Hui, D. and Jiang, C. (1996) Practical SAS Usage. Beijing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics Press, Beijing, China.
[24] SAS Institute Inc. (2005) SAS OnlineDoc 9.1.3, SAS Institute Inc., Cary.
[25] Hamidou, F., Zombre, G., Diouf, O., Diop, N.N., Guiko, S. and Braconnier, S. (2007) Physiological, biochemical and agromorphological responses of five cowpea genotypes (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) to water deficit under glasshouse conditions. Biotechnology, Agronomy, Society and Environment, 11, 225-234.
[26] Khudsar, T., Mahmooduzzafar, and Iqbal, M. (2001) Cadmium-induced changes in leaf epidermis, photosynthetic rate and pigment concentrations in Cajanus cajan. Biologia Plantarum, 44, 59-64. doi:10.1023/A:1017918320697
[27] Takele, A. and McDavid, C. (1995) The response of pigeonpea cultivars to short durations of waterlogging. African Crop Science Journal, 3, 51-58.
[28] Lopez, F.B., Setter, T.L. and McDavid, C.R. (1988) Photosynthesis and water vapor exchange of pigeonpea leaves in response to water deficit and recovery. Crop Science, 28, 141-145. doi:10.2135/cropsci1988.0011183X002800010030x
[29] Tayo, T.O. (1982) Growth development and yield of pigeon-pea (Cajanus cajan) cultivar Cita-1 in lowland tropics. 1. Effect of plant population density. Journal of Agricultural Science, 98, 65-70. doi:10.1017/S0021859600041101
[30] Farquhar, G.D. and Richards, R.A. (1984) Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water-use efficiency of wheat genotypes. Functional Plant Biology, 11, 539-552.
[31] Allen, L.H. Jr., Pan, D., Boote, K.J., Pickering, N.B. and Jones, J.W. (1995) Carbon dioxide and temperature effects on evapotranspiration and water use efficiency of soybean. Agronomy Journal, 95, 1071-1081. doi:10.2134/agronj2003.1071
[32] Xin, Z., Aiken, R. and Burke, J. (2009) Genetic diversity of transpiration efficiency in sorghum. Field Crops Research, 111, 74-80. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2008.10.010
[33] Reddy, V.R., Reddy, K.R. and Hodges, H.F. (1995) Carbon dioxide enrichment and temperature effects on cotton canopy photosynthesis, transpiration, and water-use efficiency. Field Crops Research, 41, 13-23. doi:10.1016/0378-4290(94)00104-K
[34] Balakrishnan, K., Natarajaratnam, N. and Rajendran, C. (1987) Influence of sowing date on photosynthesis and production of Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. Photosynthetica, 21, 308-313.
[35] Rochette, P., Desjardins, R. L. and Pattey, E. (1991) Spatial and temporal variability of soil respiration in agricultural fields. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 71, 189-196. doi:10.4141/cjss91-018
[36] Lohila, A., Aurela, M., Regina, K. and Laurila, T. (2003) Soil and total ecosystem respiration in agricultural fields: effect of soil and crop type. Plant and Soil, 251, 303-317. doi:10.1023/A:1023004205844

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.