Soil Informatics for Evaluating and Mapping SoilProductivity Index in an Intensively CultivatedArea of Punjab, India

Raj Setia, Vipan Verma, Pawan Sharma

.

DOI: 10.4236/jgis.2012.41010                

Abstract

Soil Informatics, the GIS-based decision-support system, helps to establish the potentials and limitations of different soils for crop production. A new methodology combining soil survey indices with available nutrients (P and K) was developed to evaluate soil productivity. Physiographic-soil map was generated by interpretation of IRS 1C/1D LISS III satellite data and soil survey in an agricultural region of Punjab, India. Georeferenced surface (0 m - 0.15 m) soil samples were collected from 267 sites using Global Positioning System (GPS). Available P (Olsen P) content varied from 5.49 kg?ha–1 to 67.0 kg?ha–1 and available K (1N NH4OAc extractable K) from 44.8 kg?ha–1 to 784 kg?ha–1. The nutrient maps (P and K) generated using ArcGIS clearly point out the specific locales where deficiency of nutrients constrained crop production. Multi nutrient (PK) map indicated that the combined P and K deficiency at a single place was negligible. The productivity index was computed by taking into account soil texture and available nutrients to evaluate the productivity of soils in each mapping unit. This approach is proposed as a method for the evaluation of sustainable soil management.

Keywords

Macro Nutrient; Soil; GIS; Remote Sensing; Soil Productivity

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	M. R. Cater, E. G. Greogirch, D. W. Anderson, H. H. Janzen and F. J. Pierce, “Concepts of Soil Quality and Their Significance,” Developments in Soil Science, Vol. 25, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1997, pp. 1-19.
[2]	J. H. Huddleston, “Development and Use of Soil Productivity Ratings in the United States,” Geoderma, Vol. 32, No. 4, 1984, pp. 297-317. doi:10.1016/0016-7061(84)90009-0
[3]	D. L. Karlen and D. E. Stott, “A Framework for Enhancing Physical and Chemical Indicators of Soil Quality,” Soil Science Society of America, Vol. 35, 1994, pp. 53-72.
[4]	G. W. Petersen, G. C. Bell, K. McSweeney, G. A. Nielsen and P. C. Robert, “Geographical Information System in Agronomy,” Advances in Agronomy, Vol. 55, 1995, pp. 67-111. doi:10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60538-6
[5]	Soil Survey Staff, “Soil Ratings for Plant Growth, A System for Arraying Soils According to Their Inherent Productivity and Suitability for Crops,” USDA, Natural Resource Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Centre, Lincoln, 2000.
[6]	J. M. Duxbury, I. P. Abrol, R. K. Gupta and K. F. Bronson, “Analysis of Long-Term Soil Fertility Experiments with Rice-Wheat Rotations in South Asia,” In: I. P. Abrol et al., Eds., Long-Term Soil Fertility Experiments with Rice-Wheat Rotations in South Asia, Rice Wheat Consortium for the Indo-Gangetic Plains, New Delhi, 2000, pp. 7-22.
[7]	P. K. Sharma, “Emerging Technologies of Remote Sensing & GIS for the Develop. Of Spatial Data Infrastructure,” Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, Vol. 52, No. 4, 2004, pp. 384-406.
[8]	A. Huete, “Remote Sensing of Soils and Soil Processes,” In: S. Ustin, Ed., Remote Sensing for Natural Resources Management and Environmental Monitoring: Manual of Remote Sensing, 3rd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 2004.
[9]	S. R. Olsen, C. V. Cole, F. S. Watanabe and L. A. Dean, “Estimation of Available P in Soils by Extraction with NaHCO3,” USDA Circulation, Washington DC, 1954.
[10]	P. F. Pratt, “Potassium,” In: A. L. Page, R. H. Miller and D. R. Keeney, Eds., Methods of Soil Analysis. Part II. Chemical and Microbiological Properties, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, 1982, pp. 225-246.
[11]	J. D. Riquier, B. Luis and J. P. Cornet, “A System for Soil Appraisal in Terms of Actual and Potential Productivity,” Soil Resource Development and Conservation Service, Land and Water Development Division, 1970, pp. 1-35.
[12]	V. K. Verma, R. K. Setia, P. K. Sharma, C. Singh and A. Kumar, “Pedospheric Variations in Distribution of DTPA— Extractable Micronutrients in Soils Developed on Different Physiographic Units in Central Parts of Punjab, India,” International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2005, pp. 243-246.